一个新的(?)框架(?)论欧洲的数字化(?)公司(?)法律?

Q3 Social Sciences
Alessio Bartolacelli
{"title":"一个新的(?)框架(?)论欧洲的数字化(?)公司(?)法律?","authors":"Alessio Bartolacelli","doi":"10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I consider the digital tools present in the European Company law currently in force, and those that have been proposed in several occasions and by different bodies during the last fifteen years. I will focus in particular on the European Commission’s Proposal issued on April 25th, 2018, showing that it does not provide a comprehensive and innovative framework on digitalization in Company Law. On the contrary, its main purpose is to suggest the introduction of a harmonized system of online registration for companies throughout Europe, directly descending from the last available version of the repealed Proposal for the amendment of Single-Member companies directive. Such a procedure, nonetheless, is dealing just partially with Company Law, as it involves a public procedure, usually part of administrative law, and, even more meaningfully, it needs to develop a role for notaries where the intervention of such subjects is required by domestic law. Furthermore, besides highlighting the momentous role the domestic registers and the business registers’ interconnection system have achieved in the European Company Law, I will discuss some points in the latest Proposal and its Annex that seem to need a reconsideration.","PeriodicalId":52280,"journal":{"name":"InterEULawEast","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A NEW (?) FRAMEWORK (?) ON DIGITALIZATION IN EUROPEAN (?) COMPANY (?) LAW?\",\"authors\":\"Alessio Bartolacelli\",\"doi\":\"10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper, I consider the digital tools present in the European Company law currently in force, and those that have been proposed in several occasions and by different bodies during the last fifteen years. I will focus in particular on the European Commission’s Proposal issued on April 25th, 2018, showing that it does not provide a comprehensive and innovative framework on digitalization in Company Law. On the contrary, its main purpose is to suggest the introduction of a harmonized system of online registration for companies throughout Europe, directly descending from the last available version of the repealed Proposal for the amendment of Single-Member companies directive. Such a procedure, nonetheless, is dealing just partially with Company Law, as it involves a public procedure, usually part of administrative law, and, even more meaningfully, it needs to develop a role for notaries where the intervention of such subjects is required by domestic law. Furthermore, besides highlighting the momentous role the domestic registers and the business registers’ interconnection system have achieved in the European Company Law, I will discuss some points in the latest Proposal and its Annex that seem to need a reconsideration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"InterEULawEast\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"InterEULawEast","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22598/iele.2018.5.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

在本文中,我考虑了目前有效的欧洲公司法中存在的数字工具,以及在过去十五年中由不同机构在几个场合提出的数字工具。我将特别关注欧盟委员会于2018年4月25日发布的提案,表明它没有为公司法中的数字化提供全面和创新的框架。相反,它的主要目的是建议为整个欧洲的公司引入一个统一的在线注册系统,直接从被废除的单一成员公司指令修正案的最后可用版本下降。然而,这种程序只是部分地涉及公司法,因为它涉及公共程序,通常是行政法的一部分,而且,更有意义的是,它需要在国内法要求公证人干预的情况下,为公证人发挥作用。此外,除了强调国内登记册和商业登记册互联系统在欧洲公司法中所发挥的重要作用外,我还将讨论最新提案及其附件中似乎需要重新考虑的一些要点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A NEW (?) FRAMEWORK (?) ON DIGITALIZATION IN EUROPEAN (?) COMPANY (?) LAW?
In this paper, I consider the digital tools present in the European Company law currently in force, and those that have been proposed in several occasions and by different bodies during the last fifteen years. I will focus in particular on the European Commission’s Proposal issued on April 25th, 2018, showing that it does not provide a comprehensive and innovative framework on digitalization in Company Law. On the contrary, its main purpose is to suggest the introduction of a harmonized system of online registration for companies throughout Europe, directly descending from the last available version of the repealed Proposal for the amendment of Single-Member companies directive. Such a procedure, nonetheless, is dealing just partially with Company Law, as it involves a public procedure, usually part of administrative law, and, even more meaningfully, it needs to develop a role for notaries where the intervention of such subjects is required by domestic law. Furthermore, besides highlighting the momentous role the domestic registers and the business registers’ interconnection system have achieved in the European Company Law, I will discuss some points in the latest Proposal and its Annex that seem to need a reconsideration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
InterEULawEast
InterEULawEast Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信