{"title":"基于道德风险和需求审查的需求预测管理","authors":"Zhaolin Li","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2450652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Demand forecasting has recently become a prime candidate for outsourcing. This research investigates how to design an information quality incentive (IQI) mechanism to manage the quality of demand forecasting in a multi-stage model where the company uses a forecaster's demand forecast to manage the production activity. The posterior demand follows a normal distribution with a precision determined by the forecaster's effort. At the end of the planning horizon, the company conducts a review with the forecaster to determine the amount of a transfer payment. If the forecaster's ability is known and the company is allowed to charge a small penalty for any forecast that is out of an acceptable range, we propose an IQI contract that enables the company to achieve the first-best outcome by overcoming moral hazard and demand censoring. In a more difficult case where any negative transfer payment is banned, the company cannot avoid paying an information rent to the forecaster. We show that in terms of reducing information rents, a transfer payment function based on absolute forecast errors is more efficient than a counter part that is based on squared forecast errors. We also extend the analysis to the case where the forecaster's ability is private.","PeriodicalId":82888,"journal":{"name":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Managing Demand Forecasting with Moral Hazard and Demand Censoring\",\"authors\":\"Zhaolin Li\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2450652\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Demand forecasting has recently become a prime candidate for outsourcing. This research investigates how to design an information quality incentive (IQI) mechanism to manage the quality of demand forecasting in a multi-stage model where the company uses a forecaster's demand forecast to manage the production activity. The posterior demand follows a normal distribution with a precision determined by the forecaster's effort. At the end of the planning horizon, the company conducts a review with the forecaster to determine the amount of a transfer payment. If the forecaster's ability is known and the company is allowed to charge a small penalty for any forecast that is out of an acceptable range, we propose an IQI contract that enables the company to achieve the first-best outcome by overcoming moral hazard and demand censoring. In a more difficult case where any negative transfer payment is banned, the company cannot avoid paying an information rent to the forecaster. We show that in terms of reducing information rents, a transfer payment function based on absolute forecast errors is more efficient than a counter part that is based on squared forecast errors. We also extend the analysis to the case where the forecaster's ability is private.\",\"PeriodicalId\":82888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2450652\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology (Elmsford, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2450652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Managing Demand Forecasting with Moral Hazard and Demand Censoring
Demand forecasting has recently become a prime candidate for outsourcing. This research investigates how to design an information quality incentive (IQI) mechanism to manage the quality of demand forecasting in a multi-stage model where the company uses a forecaster's demand forecast to manage the production activity. The posterior demand follows a normal distribution with a precision determined by the forecaster's effort. At the end of the planning horizon, the company conducts a review with the forecaster to determine the amount of a transfer payment. If the forecaster's ability is known and the company is allowed to charge a small penalty for any forecast that is out of an acceptable range, we propose an IQI contract that enables the company to achieve the first-best outcome by overcoming moral hazard and demand censoring. In a more difficult case where any negative transfer payment is banned, the company cannot avoid paying an information rent to the forecaster. We show that in terms of reducing information rents, a transfer payment function based on absolute forecast errors is more efficient than a counter part that is based on squared forecast errors. We also extend the analysis to the case where the forecaster's ability is private.