儿童家庭保健的可及性和质量:一项系统综述

IF 0.8 Q4 NURSING
C. Foster, L. Morales, Andrea J. Fawcett, Cara Coleman
{"title":"儿童家庭保健的可及性和质量:一项系统综述","authors":"C. Foster, L. Morales, Andrea J. Fawcett, Cara Coleman","doi":"10.1177/10848223231167878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the rising prevalence of children with medical complexity who need extensive medical care at home, the literature evaluating pediatric home healthcare has not been well summarized. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence-base of pediatric home healthcare to understand what is currently know about access and quality of home healthcare for children. Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched for studies in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia English publications (1980-2020) regarding children (≤18 years) using shift-based home healthcare services. Blinded independent review was conducted followed by extraction of study characteristics including how each study examined access and/or quality, which was categorized using the National Academy of Medicine quality dimensions. Of 9533 abstracts, 101 were included. Most were US (82%) and regional (72%) studies. Half (54%) focused on home nursing followed by home services generally (43%). The majority (77%) evaluated access and patient-family centeredness (62%); their results identified consistent limitations in access and quality resulting in negative impacts on patients and families. Less than 20% of publications addressed safety, effectiveness or equity. Bias scoring found that quantitative studies were universally weak, but qualitative studies were mostly moderate or strong. Results are limited by design heterogeneity and exclusion of training research. While research in pediatric home healthcare has increased, studies remain observational and rarely evaluate quality in reproducible ways. More rigorous measures and interventional research are needed to improve this healthcare sector for children.","PeriodicalId":45762,"journal":{"name":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Access and Quality of Pediatric Home Healthcare: A Systematic Review\",\"authors\":\"C. Foster, L. Morales, Andrea J. Fawcett, Cara Coleman\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10848223231167878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite the rising prevalence of children with medical complexity who need extensive medical care at home, the literature evaluating pediatric home healthcare has not been well summarized. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence-base of pediatric home healthcare to understand what is currently know about access and quality of home healthcare for children. Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched for studies in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia English publications (1980-2020) regarding children (≤18 years) using shift-based home healthcare services. Blinded independent review was conducted followed by extraction of study characteristics including how each study examined access and/or quality, which was categorized using the National Academy of Medicine quality dimensions. Of 9533 abstracts, 101 were included. Most were US (82%) and regional (72%) studies. Half (54%) focused on home nursing followed by home services generally (43%). The majority (77%) evaluated access and patient-family centeredness (62%); their results identified consistent limitations in access and quality resulting in negative impacts on patients and families. Less than 20% of publications addressed safety, effectiveness or equity. Bias scoring found that quantitative studies were universally weak, but qualitative studies were mostly moderate or strong. Results are limited by design heterogeneity and exclusion of training research. While research in pediatric home healthcare has increased, studies remain observational and rarely evaluate quality in reproducible ways. More rigorous measures and interventional research are needed to improve this healthcare sector for children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45762,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Home Health Care Management and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223231167878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Home Health Care Management and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223231167878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管越来越多的儿童需要在家中进行广泛的医疗护理,但评估儿童家庭医疗保健的文献尚未得到很好的总结。我们的目标是系统地回顾儿科家庭保健的证据基础,以了解目前对儿童家庭保健的可及性和质量的了解。我们检索了Pubmed、Ovid Medline、Embase、CINAHL、Cochrane Library、Proquest Dissertations和Theses Global在美国、英国、加拿大和澳大利亚发表的关于儿童(≤18岁)使用轮班制家庭医疗服务的研究(1980-2020)。进行盲法独立审查,然后提取研究特征,包括每个研究如何检查获取和/或质量,并使用美国国家医学科学院质量维度进行分类。9533篇摘要中,101篇被纳入。大多数是美国(82%)和地区(72%)的研究。一半(54%)关注家庭护理,其次是一般的家庭服务(43%)。大多数(77%)评估了可及性和以患者家庭为中心(62%);他们的结果确定了在获取和质量方面的持续限制,从而对患者和家庭产生负面影响。不到20%的出版物涉及安全性、有效性或公平性。偏倚评分发现定量研究普遍较弱,而定性研究大多是中等或较强。结果受到设计异质性和排除训练研究的限制。虽然对儿科家庭保健的研究有所增加,但研究仍然是观察性的,很少以可重复的方式评估质量。需要更严格的措施和干预性研究来改善这一儿童保健部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Access and Quality of Pediatric Home Healthcare: A Systematic Review
Despite the rising prevalence of children with medical complexity who need extensive medical care at home, the literature evaluating pediatric home healthcare has not been well summarized. Our objective was to systematically review the evidence-base of pediatric home healthcare to understand what is currently know about access and quality of home healthcare for children. Pubmed, Ovid Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations and Theses Global were searched for studies in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, and Australia English publications (1980-2020) regarding children (≤18 years) using shift-based home healthcare services. Blinded independent review was conducted followed by extraction of study characteristics including how each study examined access and/or quality, which was categorized using the National Academy of Medicine quality dimensions. Of 9533 abstracts, 101 were included. Most were US (82%) and regional (72%) studies. Half (54%) focused on home nursing followed by home services generally (43%). The majority (77%) evaluated access and patient-family centeredness (62%); their results identified consistent limitations in access and quality resulting in negative impacts on patients and families. Less than 20% of publications addressed safety, effectiveness or equity. Bias scoring found that quantitative studies were universally weak, but qualitative studies were mostly moderate or strong. Results are limited by design heterogeneity and exclusion of training research. While research in pediatric home healthcare has increased, studies remain observational and rarely evaluate quality in reproducible ways. More rigorous measures and interventional research are needed to improve this healthcare sector for children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Home Health Care Management & Practice is a comprehensive resource for clinicians, case managers, and administrators providing home and community based health care. Articles address diverse issues, ranging from individual patient care and case management to the human resource management and organizational operations management and administration of organizations and agencies. Regular columns focus on research, legal issues, psychosocial perspectives, accreditation and licensing, compliance, management, and cultural diversity. Specific topics include treatment, care and therapeutic techniques, cultural competence, family caregivers, equipment management, human resources, home health center.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信