A. Al-Amin, D. Rolnik, C. Black, A. White, C. Stolarek, S. Brennecke, F. da Silva Costa
{"title":"三种不同筛选算法对早产子痫前期妊娠中期预测的准确性","authors":"A. Al-Amin, D. Rolnik, C. Black, A. White, C. Stolarek, S. Brennecke, F. da Silva Costa","doi":"10.1097/01.aoa.0000552910.82459.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare the performance of three different screening methods (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations and Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm) for second trimester prediction of preeclampsia.","PeriodicalId":8599,"journal":{"name":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Accuracy of second trimester prediction of preterm preeclampsia by three different screening algorithms\",\"authors\":\"A. Al-Amin, D. Rolnik, C. Black, A. White, C. Stolarek, S. Brennecke, F. da Silva Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/01.aoa.0000552910.82459.67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To compare the performance of three different screening methods (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations and Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm) for second trimester prediction of preeclampsia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8599,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"19\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000552910.82459.67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.aoa.0000552910.82459.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Accuracy of second trimester prediction of preterm preeclampsia by three different screening algorithms
To compare the performance of three different screening methods (National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) recommendations and Fetal Medicine Foundation (FMF) algorithm) for second trimester prediction of preeclampsia.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
