离散事件模拟:对用户实践的探究

Brian W Hollocks
{"title":"离散事件模拟:对用户实践的探究","authors":"Brian W Hollocks","doi":"10.1016/S0928-4869(01)00028-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Noting the increasing use of discrete-event simulation directly by non-specialists, this paper considers the significance of methodology and reports results from a survey of user practice in experimentation. The inquiry addressed practitioners engaged in “steady-state” type problems and the outcomes reveal that simulation practice is more strongly influenced by user judgement than formal disciplines. This may, with experienced simulation specialists, lead to correct run control and results interpretation but, with non-specialists, there is higher risk. Particular areas of concern are identified and the study also considers further support that simulation software might bring to the experimentation process.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101162,"journal":{"name":"Simulation Practice and Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-4869(01)00028-3","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discrete-event simulation: an inquiry into user practice\",\"authors\":\"Brian W Hollocks\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0928-4869(01)00028-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Noting the increasing use of discrete-event simulation directly by non-specialists, this paper considers the significance of methodology and reports results from a survey of user practice in experimentation. The inquiry addressed practitioners engaged in “steady-state” type problems and the outcomes reveal that simulation practice is more strongly influenced by user judgement than formal disciplines. This may, with experienced simulation specialists, lead to correct run control and results interpretation but, with non-specialists, there is higher risk. Particular areas of concern are identified and the study also considers further support that simulation software might bring to the experimentation process.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101162,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Simulation Practice and Theory\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0928-4869(01)00028-3\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Simulation Practice and Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928486901000283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Simulation Practice and Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0928486901000283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

注意到非专业人员越来越多地直接使用离散事件模拟,本文考虑了方法的重要性,并报告了实验中用户实践调查的结果。调查涉及从事“稳态”类型问题的从业者,结果显示,模拟实践比正式学科更受用户判断的影响。对于经验丰富的模拟专家来说,这可能会导致正确的运行控制和结果解释,但对于非专业人员来说,风险更高。确定了特别关注的领域,研究还考虑了模拟软件可能为实验过程带来的进一步支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discrete-event simulation: an inquiry into user practice

Noting the increasing use of discrete-event simulation directly by non-specialists, this paper considers the significance of methodology and reports results from a survey of user practice in experimentation. The inquiry addressed practitioners engaged in “steady-state” type problems and the outcomes reveal that simulation practice is more strongly influenced by user judgement than formal disciplines. This may, with experienced simulation specialists, lead to correct run control and results interpretation but, with non-specialists, there is higher risk. Particular areas of concern are identified and the study also considers further support that simulation software might bring to the experimentation process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信