胃食管反流中预测蠕动异常的因素

Piyush Bawane, Mayank Jain, M. Srinivas, T. Michael, J. Venkataraman
{"title":"胃食管反流中预测蠕动异常的因素","authors":"Piyush Bawane, Mayank Jain, M. Srinivas, T. Michael, J. Venkataraman","doi":"10.7869/TG.556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Data regarding the type of breaks and its impact on peristalsis in gastro esophageal reflux disease(GERD) is scanty. Aim : To study the prevalence and significance of segmental breaks in symptomatic GERD cases. To identify the endoscopy grading and dietary factors that are likely to affect esophageal motility. Materials and Methods : 106 patients with GERD were included. Baseline patient information included age, gender, BMI, diet recall and upper endoscopy report.Normal (Group I) and ineffective swallows (Group II, minor peristaltic defects) were compared for proximal and distal segment breaks . Impact of multiple rapid swallows was assessed in a subset of cases.Appropriate statistical tests were used. p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : 72 patients had normal esophageal motility (Group I) and 30 had minor peristalitc abnormality (Group II). BMI was significantly higher in Group II. Mean basal LES pressure, IRP and DCI in Group II was significantly low and a significant proportion of swallows in patients in Group II had breaks greater than 5 cm in S1 and more than 2 cm in S2 and S3. The basal LES pressure and BMI cut off was 12.1 mm Hg and 26.1 kg per m2respectively. The odds ratio of having a minor peristaltic disorder was 3.2 times(1.4-4.1, p 0.001) with the combination of these two factors. Conclusion : Majority of GERD patients had normal motility. Even in those with minor peristaltic abnormality, the peristaltic reserve was good.Patients in group II had significantly lower basal LES pressures and higher BMI.","PeriodicalId":23281,"journal":{"name":"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors Predicting Peristaltic Abnormalities in Gastroesophageal Reflux\",\"authors\":\"Piyush Bawane, Mayank Jain, M. Srinivas, T. Michael, J. Venkataraman\",\"doi\":\"10.7869/TG.556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background : Data regarding the type of breaks and its impact on peristalsis in gastro esophageal reflux disease(GERD) is scanty. Aim : To study the prevalence and significance of segmental breaks in symptomatic GERD cases. To identify the endoscopy grading and dietary factors that are likely to affect esophageal motility. Materials and Methods : 106 patients with GERD were included. Baseline patient information included age, gender, BMI, diet recall and upper endoscopy report.Normal (Group I) and ineffective swallows (Group II, minor peristaltic defects) were compared for proximal and distal segment breaks . Impact of multiple rapid swallows was assessed in a subset of cases.Appropriate statistical tests were used. p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : 72 patients had normal esophageal motility (Group I) and 30 had minor peristalitc abnormality (Group II). BMI was significantly higher in Group II. Mean basal LES pressure, IRP and DCI in Group II was significantly low and a significant proportion of swallows in patients in Group II had breaks greater than 5 cm in S1 and more than 2 cm in S2 and S3. The basal LES pressure and BMI cut off was 12.1 mm Hg and 26.1 kg per m2respectively. The odds ratio of having a minor peristaltic disorder was 3.2 times(1.4-4.1, p 0.001) with the combination of these two factors. Conclusion : Majority of GERD patients had normal motility. Even in those with minor peristaltic abnormality, the peristaltic reserve was good.Patients in group II had significantly lower basal LES pressures and higher BMI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7869/TG.556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tropical gastroenterology : official journal of the Digestive Diseases Foundation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7869/TG.556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关于胃食管反流病(GERD)的断裂类型及其对蠕动的影响的资料很少。目的:探讨有症状的反流胃食管反流中节段断裂的发生率及意义。确定可能影响食管运动的内镜分级和饮食因素。材料与方法:纳入106例胃食管反流患者。基线患者信息包括年龄、性别、BMI、饮食回忆和上颌内窥镜检查报告。比较正常燕子(组I)和无效燕子(组II,轻微蠕动缺陷)近端和远端节段断裂情况。在部分病例中评估了多次快速吞咽的影响。采用了适当的统计检验。P值<0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:食管运动正常72例(I组),轻度蠕动异常30例(II组),II组BMI明显增高。II组患者的平均基础LES压、IRP和DCI均明显较低,且II组患者中有显著比例的吞口S1大于5cm, S2和S3大于2cm。基础LES压和BMI分别为12.1 mm Hg和26.1 kg / m2。合并这两个因素时,患有轻微蠕动障碍的比值比为3.2倍(1.4-4.1,p 0.001)。结论:大多数胃食管反流患者运动功能正常。即使有轻微的蠕动异常,蠕动储备也很好。II组患者基底LES压明显降低,BMI明显升高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors Predicting Peristaltic Abnormalities in Gastroesophageal Reflux
Background : Data regarding the type of breaks and its impact on peristalsis in gastro esophageal reflux disease(GERD) is scanty. Aim : To study the prevalence and significance of segmental breaks in symptomatic GERD cases. To identify the endoscopy grading and dietary factors that are likely to affect esophageal motility. Materials and Methods : 106 patients with GERD were included. Baseline patient information included age, gender, BMI, diet recall and upper endoscopy report.Normal (Group I) and ineffective swallows (Group II, minor peristaltic defects) were compared for proximal and distal segment breaks . Impact of multiple rapid swallows was assessed in a subset of cases.Appropriate statistical tests were used. p value <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results : 72 patients had normal esophageal motility (Group I) and 30 had minor peristalitc abnormality (Group II). BMI was significantly higher in Group II. Mean basal LES pressure, IRP and DCI in Group II was significantly low and a significant proportion of swallows in patients in Group II had breaks greater than 5 cm in S1 and more than 2 cm in S2 and S3. The basal LES pressure and BMI cut off was 12.1 mm Hg and 26.1 kg per m2respectively. The odds ratio of having a minor peristaltic disorder was 3.2 times(1.4-4.1, p 0.001) with the combination of these two factors. Conclusion : Majority of GERD patients had normal motility. Even in those with minor peristaltic abnormality, the peristaltic reserve was good.Patients in group II had significantly lower basal LES pressures and higher BMI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信