就业创造法实施后的积极虚构原则:一种预言性的法律范式

Jurnal IUS Pub Date : 2023-04-12 DOI:10.29303/ius.v11i1.1168
Edi Pranoto, Kukuh Sudarmanto
{"title":"就业创造法实施后的积极虚构原则:一种预言性的法律范式","authors":"Edi Pranoto, Kukuh Sudarmanto","doi":"10.29303/ius.v11i1.1168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The positive fictitious principle in the Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (CK Law) exists to facilitate investment and simplify licensing. However, the provisions in the CK Law, which exclude the role of the Administrative Court in fictitious applications have the potential to cause injustice and legal uncertainty in society. That research focuses on examining the positive fictitious principle's existence after the CK Law's enactment in the paradigm of prophetic law. The paradigm of prophetic regulation was chosen in this study as an effort to explore the theological (divine) and human dimensions in positive fictitious formulations as in CK Law. This research is a normative legal type of research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that in terms of the three aspects of prophetic law, namely transcendence, liberation, and humanization, the provisions of the CK Law, which no longer involve the role of the Administrative Court and have not issued Presidential Regulations regarding positive fiction can cause uncertainty and injustice in society. That makes the substance of the prophetic law in the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law not be realized optimally. Orientation based on the prophetic legal paradigm in regulating the positive fictitious principle after regulation in the CK Law, according to the author, can be done by revising the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law by returning the competence of the State Administrative Court.","PeriodicalId":34628,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal IUS","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Positive Fictional Principle After the Implementation of The Job Creation Law: A Prophetic Legal Paradigm\",\"authors\":\"Edi Pranoto, Kukuh Sudarmanto\",\"doi\":\"10.29303/ius.v11i1.1168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The positive fictitious principle in the Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (CK Law) exists to facilitate investment and simplify licensing. However, the provisions in the CK Law, which exclude the role of the Administrative Court in fictitious applications have the potential to cause injustice and legal uncertainty in society. That research focuses on examining the positive fictitious principle's existence after the CK Law's enactment in the paradigm of prophetic law. The paradigm of prophetic regulation was chosen in this study as an effort to explore the theological (divine) and human dimensions in positive fictitious formulations as in CK Law. This research is a normative legal type of research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that in terms of the three aspects of prophetic law, namely transcendence, liberation, and humanization, the provisions of the CK Law, which no longer involve the role of the Administrative Court and have not issued Presidential Regulations regarding positive fiction can cause uncertainty and injustice in society. That makes the substance of the prophetic law in the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law not be realized optimally. Orientation based on the prophetic legal paradigm in regulating the positive fictitious principle after regulation in the CK Law, according to the author, can be done by revising the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law by returning the competence of the State Administrative Court.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal IUS\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal IUS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1168\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal IUS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i1.1168","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于创造就业的2020年第11号法(CK法)中的积极虚拟原则是为了促进投资和简化许可。然而,《中华人民共和国法律》的规定排除了行政法院在虚构申请中的作用,这有可能在社会上造成不公正和法律不确定性。这一研究的重点是在预言法的范式中考察《CK法》制定后积极虚拟原则的存在。在这项研究中,我们选择了预言规则的范例,作为在CK法中积极的虚构表述中探索神学(神性)和人类维度的努力。本研究是一种具有概念和成文法方法的规范性法学研究。研究结果证实,在预言性法律的三个方面,即超越性、解放性和人性化方面,CK法的规定不再涉及行政法院的作用,也没有发布关于正面小说的总统条例,可能会造成社会的不确定性和不公正。这使得《CK法》正面虚构条款中预言性法律的实质没有得到最优实现。笔者认为,在《长江法》规制后对积极虚拟原则进行规制时,基于预言性法律范式的定位可以通过修正《长江法》中的积极虚拟条款,回归国家行政法院的权限来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Positive Fictional Principle After the Implementation of The Job Creation Law: A Prophetic Legal Paradigm
The positive fictitious principle in the Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (CK Law) exists to facilitate investment and simplify licensing. However, the provisions in the CK Law, which exclude the role of the Administrative Court in fictitious applications have the potential to cause injustice and legal uncertainty in society. That research focuses on examining the positive fictitious principle's existence after the CK Law's enactment in the paradigm of prophetic law. The paradigm of prophetic regulation was chosen in this study as an effort to explore the theological (divine) and human dimensions in positive fictitious formulations as in CK Law. This research is a normative legal type of research with a concept and statutory approach. The results of the study confirm that in terms of the three aspects of prophetic law, namely transcendence, liberation, and humanization, the provisions of the CK Law, which no longer involve the role of the Administrative Court and have not issued Presidential Regulations regarding positive fiction can cause uncertainty and injustice in society. That makes the substance of the prophetic law in the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law not be realized optimally. Orientation based on the prophetic legal paradigm in regulating the positive fictitious principle after regulation in the CK Law, according to the author, can be done by revising the positive fictitious provisions in the CK Law by returning the competence of the State Administrative Court.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信