{"title":"对新型纤维素醋酸酯膜‘celeka -VSP’的血清蛋白分块检查的评价:多设施合作研究,用于批件间差异和设施间差异","authors":"弘子 渡邊, 綾 杉浦, 和子 大竹, 皓子 大竹, 深田 比呂子, 康司 堀井, 満 村田, 和代 中村, 秋恵 須郷, 栄治 宮島, 京子 宮﨑, 正芳 米山, 照夫 江上, 卓 渡邊, 芝 紀代子, 真人 前川","doi":"10.2198/SBK.51.135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to substitute SELECA-VSP for SEPARAX-SP, we investigated membrane performance difference among SELECA-VSP lots and among laboratories. We examined three lots of SELECA-VSP, namely T10, T12 and T14. Automated electrophoresis system for protein fraction test used are Olympus AES series in two laboratories and JOKOH CTE series in other two laboratories. The 4 laboratories assayed common serum samples as usual procedure of each laboratory.Among different membrane lots, good correlation between each two lot was observed in the five serum protein fractions. There was statistically significant difference among the membrane lots, however, it might be only due to good reproducibility and statistics. The bias was below clinical permission limit.Among laboratories, good correlation between each two laboratory was observed in the five serum protein fractions. The bias between laboratories is below permission limit, compared with bias detected from external quality assessment program for SEPARAX-SP.In conclusion, because the bias in membrane lots and laboratories can be ignored for laboratory diagnosis of serum protein fraction test, SELECA-VSP will come onto the market to make up for SEPARAX-SP.","PeriodicalId":15059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of capillary electrophoresis","volume":"28 1","pages":"135-145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"新規セルロースアセテート膜'セレカ-VSP'の血清タンパク分画検査への評価 : ロット間差および施設間差の多施設共同研究\",\"authors\":\"弘子 渡邊, 綾 杉浦, 和子 大竹, 皓子 大竹, 深田 比呂子, 康司 堀井, 満 村田, 和代 中村, 秋恵 須郷, 栄治 宮島, 京子 宮﨑, 正芳 米山, 照夫 江上, 卓 渡邊, 芝 紀代子, 真人 前川\",\"doi\":\"10.2198/SBK.51.135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to substitute SELECA-VSP for SEPARAX-SP, we investigated membrane performance difference among SELECA-VSP lots and among laboratories. We examined three lots of SELECA-VSP, namely T10, T12 and T14. Automated electrophoresis system for protein fraction test used are Olympus AES series in two laboratories and JOKOH CTE series in other two laboratories. The 4 laboratories assayed common serum samples as usual procedure of each laboratory.Among different membrane lots, good correlation between each two lot was observed in the five serum protein fractions. There was statistically significant difference among the membrane lots, however, it might be only due to good reproducibility and statistics. The bias was below clinical permission limit.Among laboratories, good correlation between each two laboratory was observed in the five serum protein fractions. The bias between laboratories is below permission limit, compared with bias detected from external quality assessment program for SEPARAX-SP.In conclusion, because the bias in membrane lots and laboratories can be ignored for laboratory diagnosis of serum protein fraction test, SELECA-VSP will come onto the market to make up for SEPARAX-SP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15059,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of capillary electrophoresis\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"135-145\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of capillary electrophoresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2198/SBK.51.135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of capillary electrophoresis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2198/SBK.51.135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
In order to substitute SELECA-VSP for SEPARAX-SP, we investigated membrane performance difference among SELECA-VSP lots and among laboratories. We examined three lots of SELECA-VSP, namely T10, T12 and T14. Automated electrophoresis system for protein fraction test used are Olympus AES series in two laboratories and JOKOH CTE series in other two laboratories. The 4 laboratories assayed common serum samples as usual procedure of each laboratory.Among different membrane lots, good correlation between each two lot was observed in the five serum protein fractions. There was statistically significant difference among the membrane lots, however, it might be only due to good reproducibility and statistics. The bias was below clinical permission limit.Among laboratories, good correlation between each two laboratory was observed in the five serum protein fractions. The bias between laboratories is below permission limit, compared with bias detected from external quality assessment program for SEPARAX-SP.In conclusion, because the bias in membrane lots and laboratories can be ignored for laboratory diagnosis of serum protein fraction test, SELECA-VSP will come onto the market to make up for SEPARAX-SP.