碳酸盐岩酸化用乳酸设计的实验结果

Luai Alhamad, Basil M. Alfakher, Abdulla A. Alrustum, Sajjad Aldarweesh
{"title":"碳酸盐岩酸化用乳酸设计的实验结果","authors":"Luai Alhamad, Basil M. Alfakher, Abdulla A. Alrustum, Sajjad Aldarweesh","doi":"10.2118/207273-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Acidizing deep carbonate formations by Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is a complex task due to high reaction and corrosion rates. Mixing organic acids with HCl is a typical method to reduce the acid's reactivity and corrosivity. Lactic acid has not been investigated completely in the area of carbonate acidizing. Lactic acid has a dissociation constant similar to formic acid, which is approximately 10 times larger than acetic acid. Therefore, the objective of this work is to compare lactic/HCl blends with plain HCl and formic/HCl blends.\n Corrosion tests were conducted at high temperature on C-95 steel coupons to investigate associated corrosion damage. Coreflood tests were performed on Indiana limestone cores to mimic matrix acidizing treatment and to investigate amount of pore volumes required to breakthrough. All blends were prepared to be equivalent to 15 wt% (4.4 M) HCl for comparison. Lactic and formic acid concentrations were set to be (0.5 or 1 M), and HCl concentration was calculated as appropriate to reach a blend with strength of 4.4 M.\n In terms of corrosivity evaluation, blends of lactic and HCl acids showed a corrosion rate of up to 1.97 lb/ft2 at 300°F. The formic and HCl blend showed a corrosion rate of 1.68 lb/ft2 at the same temperature. The difference in corrosion rates between the two mixtures is due to molecular weight difference between lactic and formic acids. When both acids were prepared at 1 M, lactic acid blend required more HCl to be equivalent to 15 wt% HCl acid which was associated with an increase in corrosion rate. Coreflood results established acid efficiency curves for lactic/HCl acid blends. The curves highlighted the correlation between acid-core reactivity, injection rate, and dissolution pattern. Lactic/HCl blend was less reactive than formic/HCl mixture as the last required lower injection rate to obtain optimum pore volume to breakthrough at 300°F. Lactic/HCl blend was able to generate an optimum dissolution pattern as a dominant wormhole was shown on tested core plugs inlet face.\n This study expands the investigation of lactic acid utilization in carbonate acidizing. Major advantages rendered by using lactic acid with HCl include: (1) favorable dissolution pattern due to lactic acid being less reactive than HCl or formic acids, and (2) less corrosion rates comparing to HCl, that can reduce allocated costs for maintenance and replacements.","PeriodicalId":10981,"journal":{"name":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Results to Design Lactic Acid for Carbonate Acidizing\",\"authors\":\"Luai Alhamad, Basil M. Alfakher, Abdulla A. Alrustum, Sajjad Aldarweesh\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/207273-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Acidizing deep carbonate formations by Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is a complex task due to high reaction and corrosion rates. Mixing organic acids with HCl is a typical method to reduce the acid's reactivity and corrosivity. Lactic acid has not been investigated completely in the area of carbonate acidizing. Lactic acid has a dissociation constant similar to formic acid, which is approximately 10 times larger than acetic acid. Therefore, the objective of this work is to compare lactic/HCl blends with plain HCl and formic/HCl blends.\\n Corrosion tests were conducted at high temperature on C-95 steel coupons to investigate associated corrosion damage. Coreflood tests were performed on Indiana limestone cores to mimic matrix acidizing treatment and to investigate amount of pore volumes required to breakthrough. All blends were prepared to be equivalent to 15 wt% (4.4 M) HCl for comparison. Lactic and formic acid concentrations were set to be (0.5 or 1 M), and HCl concentration was calculated as appropriate to reach a blend with strength of 4.4 M.\\n In terms of corrosivity evaluation, blends of lactic and HCl acids showed a corrosion rate of up to 1.97 lb/ft2 at 300°F. The formic and HCl blend showed a corrosion rate of 1.68 lb/ft2 at the same temperature. The difference in corrosion rates between the two mixtures is due to molecular weight difference between lactic and formic acids. When both acids were prepared at 1 M, lactic acid blend required more HCl to be equivalent to 15 wt% HCl acid which was associated with an increase in corrosion rate. Coreflood results established acid efficiency curves for lactic/HCl acid blends. The curves highlighted the correlation between acid-core reactivity, injection rate, and dissolution pattern. Lactic/HCl blend was less reactive than formic/HCl mixture as the last required lower injection rate to obtain optimum pore volume to breakthrough at 300°F. Lactic/HCl blend was able to generate an optimum dissolution pattern as a dominant wormhole was shown on tested core plugs inlet face.\\n This study expands the investigation of lactic acid utilization in carbonate acidizing. Major advantages rendered by using lactic acid with HCl include: (1) favorable dissolution pattern due to lactic acid being less reactive than HCl or formic acids, and (2) less corrosion rates comparing to HCl, that can reduce allocated costs for maintenance and replacements.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/207273-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 4 Thu, November 18, 2021","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/207273-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由于反应速率和腐蚀速率高,用盐酸(HCl)酸化深层碳酸盐地层是一项复杂的任务。有机酸与盐酸混合是降低酸的反应性和腐蚀性的一种典型方法。乳酸在碳酸盐岩酸化领域的研究还不完全。乳酸的解离常数与甲酸相似,约为醋酸的10倍。因此,这项工作的目的是比较乳酸/HCl共混物与普通HCl和甲酸/HCl共混物。对C-95钢板进行了高温腐蚀试验,研究了相应的腐蚀损伤。在印第安纳石灰石岩心上进行了驱心测试,以模拟基质酸化处理,并研究突破所需的孔隙体积。所有共混物均配制成相当于15 wt% (4.4 M) HCl的混合物以供比较。乳酸和甲酸的浓度设置为(0.5或1 M), HCl的浓度计算适当,以达到强度为4.4 M的混合物。在腐蚀性评估方面,乳酸和HCl的混合物在300°F时的腐蚀速率高达1.97 lb/ft2。在相同温度下,甲酸和盐酸共混物的腐蚀速率为1.68 lb/ft2。两种混合物的腐蚀速率不同是由于乳酸和甲酸的分子量不同。当两种酸在1m的浓度下制备时,乳酸混合物需要更多的HCl才能与15wt %的HCl酸相对应,这与腐蚀速率的增加有关。岩心驱替结果建立了乳酸/盐酸共混物的酸效曲线。曲线突出了酸岩心反应性、注入速度和溶解模式之间的相关性。乳酸/HCl混合物的反应性低于甲酸/HCl混合物,因为前者需要较低的注入速率才能获得最佳孔隙体积,从而在300°F下突破。乳酸/HCl混合物能够产生最佳的溶解模式,因为在测试的岩心塞入口面上显示了一个主要的虫孔。本研究拓展了乳酸在碳酸盐岩酸化中的利用研究。乳酸与HCl混合使用的主要优点包括:(1)由于乳酸比HCl或甲酸反应性更低,因此具有良好的溶解模式;(2)与HCl相比,乳酸的腐蚀速率更低,可以减少维护和更换的分配成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Results to Design Lactic Acid for Carbonate Acidizing
Acidizing deep carbonate formations by Hydrochloric acid (HCl) is a complex task due to high reaction and corrosion rates. Mixing organic acids with HCl is a typical method to reduce the acid's reactivity and corrosivity. Lactic acid has not been investigated completely in the area of carbonate acidizing. Lactic acid has a dissociation constant similar to formic acid, which is approximately 10 times larger than acetic acid. Therefore, the objective of this work is to compare lactic/HCl blends with plain HCl and formic/HCl blends. Corrosion tests were conducted at high temperature on C-95 steel coupons to investigate associated corrosion damage. Coreflood tests were performed on Indiana limestone cores to mimic matrix acidizing treatment and to investigate amount of pore volumes required to breakthrough. All blends were prepared to be equivalent to 15 wt% (4.4 M) HCl for comparison. Lactic and formic acid concentrations were set to be (0.5 or 1 M), and HCl concentration was calculated as appropriate to reach a blend with strength of 4.4 M. In terms of corrosivity evaluation, blends of lactic and HCl acids showed a corrosion rate of up to 1.97 lb/ft2 at 300°F. The formic and HCl blend showed a corrosion rate of 1.68 lb/ft2 at the same temperature. The difference in corrosion rates between the two mixtures is due to molecular weight difference between lactic and formic acids. When both acids were prepared at 1 M, lactic acid blend required more HCl to be equivalent to 15 wt% HCl acid which was associated with an increase in corrosion rate. Coreflood results established acid efficiency curves for lactic/HCl acid blends. The curves highlighted the correlation between acid-core reactivity, injection rate, and dissolution pattern. Lactic/HCl blend was less reactive than formic/HCl mixture as the last required lower injection rate to obtain optimum pore volume to breakthrough at 300°F. Lactic/HCl blend was able to generate an optimum dissolution pattern as a dominant wormhole was shown on tested core plugs inlet face. This study expands the investigation of lactic acid utilization in carbonate acidizing. Major advantages rendered by using lactic acid with HCl include: (1) favorable dissolution pattern due to lactic acid being less reactive than HCl or formic acids, and (2) less corrosion rates comparing to HCl, that can reduce allocated costs for maintenance and replacements.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信