H. Nath, K. Barua, K. H. Uddin, Monirul Islam, O. Faruque, Atiqur Rahman, S. Bari, Rahul Quddus
{"title":"垂体腺瘤手术的研究:经蝶窦显微与鼻内内镜入路","authors":"H. Nath, K. Barua, K. H. Uddin, Monirul Islam, O. Faruque, Atiqur Rahman, S. Bari, Rahul Quddus","doi":"10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Transphenoidal endoscopic approach is minimal invasive surgery in case of pituitary adenoma. \nObjective : To see the outcome of transphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic approach in case of pituitary tumor. \nResults : This study showed among the 37 patients, 25 (67.6%) were done by transphenoidal microscopic approach and 12 (32.4%) patients were done by endonasal endoscopic approach. Among the 12 patients 8(66.7%) were male and 4(33.3%) were female. Among the 25, patients 15(60%) were male and 10(40%) were female. It was documented that in 12 patients, 10(83.3%) were macroadenoma and 2(16.7%) were microadenoma. It was evident that among the 25 patient 18(72%) were macroadenoma and 7(28%) were microadenoma. Among 12 patients, 11 (91.7%) had preoperative visual disturbance and 1(8.3%) had normal vision. It was observed that among 25 patients, 23(92%) patients had preoperative visual disturbance and 2 (8%) patients had normal vision. Tumor was totally removed in 9(75%) patients in endoscopic approach and 14(56%) in microscopic approach. Clinically 10(83.3%) patients were improved in endoscopically and 16(64%) patients were improved in microscopic group. \nConclusion: It was concluded that endoscopic endonasal approach is better than transphenoidal microscopic approach. \nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (1): 21-29","PeriodicalId":8727,"journal":{"name":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Study of Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: Transphenoidal Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach\",\"authors\":\"H. Nath, K. Barua, K. H. Uddin, Monirul Islam, O. Faruque, Atiqur Rahman, S. Bari, Rahul Quddus\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Transphenoidal endoscopic approach is minimal invasive surgery in case of pituitary adenoma. \\nObjective : To see the outcome of transphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic approach in case of pituitary tumor. \\nResults : This study showed among the 37 patients, 25 (67.6%) were done by transphenoidal microscopic approach and 12 (32.4%) patients were done by endonasal endoscopic approach. Among the 12 patients 8(66.7%) were male and 4(33.3%) were female. Among the 25, patients 15(60%) were male and 10(40%) were female. It was documented that in 12 patients, 10(83.3%) were macroadenoma and 2(16.7%) were microadenoma. It was evident that among the 25 patient 18(72%) were macroadenoma and 7(28%) were microadenoma. Among 12 patients, 11 (91.7%) had preoperative visual disturbance and 1(8.3%) had normal vision. It was observed that among 25 patients, 23(92%) patients had preoperative visual disturbance and 2 (8%) patients had normal vision. Tumor was totally removed in 9(75%) patients in endoscopic approach and 14(56%) in microscopic approach. Clinically 10(83.3%) patients were improved in endoscopically and 16(64%) patients were improved in microscopic group. \\nConclusion: It was concluded that endoscopic endonasal approach is better than transphenoidal microscopic approach. \\nBangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (1): 21-29\",\"PeriodicalId\":8727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-01-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/bjn.v31i1.57372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A Study of Pituitary Adenoma Surgery: Transphenoidal Microscopic Versus Endoscopic Endonasal Approach
Background: Transphenoidal endoscopic approach is minimal invasive surgery in case of pituitary adenoma.
Objective : To see the outcome of transphenoidal endoscopic and microscopic approach in case of pituitary tumor.
Results : This study showed among the 37 patients, 25 (67.6%) were done by transphenoidal microscopic approach and 12 (32.4%) patients were done by endonasal endoscopic approach. Among the 12 patients 8(66.7%) were male and 4(33.3%) were female. Among the 25, patients 15(60%) were male and 10(40%) were female. It was documented that in 12 patients, 10(83.3%) were macroadenoma and 2(16.7%) were microadenoma. It was evident that among the 25 patient 18(72%) were macroadenoma and 7(28%) were microadenoma. Among 12 patients, 11 (91.7%) had preoperative visual disturbance and 1(8.3%) had normal vision. It was observed that among 25 patients, 23(92%) patients had preoperative visual disturbance and 2 (8%) patients had normal vision. Tumor was totally removed in 9(75%) patients in endoscopic approach and 14(56%) in microscopic approach. Clinically 10(83.3%) patients were improved in endoscopically and 16(64%) patients were improved in microscopic group.
Conclusion: It was concluded that endoscopic endonasal approach is better than transphenoidal microscopic approach.
Bangladesh Journal of Neuroscience 2015; Vol. 31 (1): 21-29