作为呼吸健康专业人员的新兴角色的姑息治疗:来自横断面,探索性加拿大调查的结果

D. Goodridge, Jaimie Peters
{"title":"作为呼吸健康专业人员的新兴角色的姑息治疗:来自横断面,探索性加拿大调查的结果","authors":"D. Goodridge, Jaimie Peters","doi":"10.29390/cjrt-2019-010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Respiratory Health Professionals (RHPs) with specialty training in the management of asthma and COPD, often care for patients with advanced respiratory disease, who have less access to palliative care than patients with similar disease burden. The aims of this study were to: (i) explore the current and desired roles of RHPs in terms of palliative care and (ii) examine barriers to discussions with patients about palliative care. Methods An online survey addressing the aims of this study was developed and pilot tested. The survey was distributed nationally using the database of the Lung Association’s RESPTREC respiratory educator training program. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results A total of 123 completed surveys were returned, with respiratory therapists comprising the largest group of respondents. The majority indicated that end-of-life care was less than optimal for patients with advanced respiratory illnesses and agreed that palliative care should be a role of RHPs. Patient- and family-related barriers to having end-of-life discussions included: difficulty accepting prognosis, limitations and complications, and lack of capacity. For providers, the most important barriers were: lack of training, uncertainty about prognosis, and lack of time. The health care system barriers of concern were increasing demand for palliative care services and limited accessibility of palliative care for those with advanced respiratory diseases and difficulties in accurate prognostication for these conditions. Discussion Incorporating a more defined role in palliative care was generally seen as a desirable evolution of the RHP role. A number of strategies to mitigate identified barriers to discussions with the patient are described. Better alignment of the services required with the needs of patients with advanced respiratory disease can be addressed in a number of ways. Conclusions As RHP roles continue to evolve, consideration should be given to the ways in which RHPs can contribute to improving the quality of care for patients with advanced respiratory disease. Building collaborations with RHPs, palliative care, and other existing health programs can ensure high quality of care. Creating and taking advantage of learning opportunities to build skills and comfort in using a palliative approach will benefit respiratory patients.","PeriodicalId":9533,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Palliative care as an emerging role for respiratory health professionals: Findings from a cross-sectional, exploratory Canadian survey\",\"authors\":\"D. Goodridge, Jaimie Peters\",\"doi\":\"10.29390/cjrt-2019-010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction Respiratory Health Professionals (RHPs) with specialty training in the management of asthma and COPD, often care for patients with advanced respiratory disease, who have less access to palliative care than patients with similar disease burden. The aims of this study were to: (i) explore the current and desired roles of RHPs in terms of palliative care and (ii) examine barriers to discussions with patients about palliative care. Methods An online survey addressing the aims of this study was developed and pilot tested. The survey was distributed nationally using the database of the Lung Association’s RESPTREC respiratory educator training program. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results A total of 123 completed surveys were returned, with respiratory therapists comprising the largest group of respondents. The majority indicated that end-of-life care was less than optimal for patients with advanced respiratory illnesses and agreed that palliative care should be a role of RHPs. Patient- and family-related barriers to having end-of-life discussions included: difficulty accepting prognosis, limitations and complications, and lack of capacity. For providers, the most important barriers were: lack of training, uncertainty about prognosis, and lack of time. The health care system barriers of concern were increasing demand for palliative care services and limited accessibility of palliative care for those with advanced respiratory diseases and difficulties in accurate prognostication for these conditions. Discussion Incorporating a more defined role in palliative care was generally seen as a desirable evolution of the RHP role. A number of strategies to mitigate identified barriers to discussions with the patient are described. Better alignment of the services required with the needs of patients with advanced respiratory disease can be addressed in a number of ways. Conclusions As RHP roles continue to evolve, consideration should be given to the ways in which RHPs can contribute to improving the quality of care for patients with advanced respiratory disease. Building collaborations with RHPs, palliative care, and other existing health programs can ensure high quality of care. Creating and taking advantage of learning opportunities to build skills and comfort in using a palliative approach will benefit respiratory patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2019-010\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Respiratory Therapy: CJRT = Revue Canadienne de la Thérapie Respiratoire : RCTR","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29390/cjrt-2019-010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在哮喘和慢性阻塞性肺病管理方面受过专业培训的呼吸健康专业人员(RHPs),通常护理晚期呼吸系统疾病患者,这些患者获得姑息治疗的机会少于具有类似疾病负担的患者。本研究的目的是:(i)探索当前和期望的角色,在姑息治疗方面的rhp和(ii)检查障碍与患者讨论姑息治疗。方法针对本研究的目的进行在线调查,并进行试点测试。该调查使用美国肺脏协会RESPTREC呼吸教育培训项目的数据库在全国范围内进行分发。进行描述性统计。结果共收到123份完整的调查问卷,其中呼吸治疗师是最大的调查对象群体。大多数人表示,临终关怀对晚期呼吸系统疾病患者来说不是最佳选择,并同意姑息治疗应该是rhp的一个角色。与患者和家属进行临终讨论的障碍包括:难以接受预后、限制和并发症,以及缺乏能力。对于提供者来说,最重要的障碍是:缺乏培训、预后不确定和缺乏时间。令人关注的卫生保健系统障碍是对姑息治疗服务的需求不断增加,晚期呼吸系统疾病患者获得姑息治疗的机会有限,这些疾病难以准确预测。在姑息治疗中纳入更明确的角色通常被视为RHP角色的理想演变。一些策略,以减轻确定的障碍,与患者讨论描述。可以通过多种方式更好地将所需服务与晚期呼吸系统疾病患者的需求结合起来。结论:随着RHP的作用不断发展,应考虑RHP如何有助于提高晚期呼吸系统疾病患者的护理质量。与区域主治医师、姑息治疗和其他现有健康项目建立合作关系可以确保高质量的护理。创造和利用学习机会,以建立技能和舒适的使用姑息治疗方法将有利于呼吸系统患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Palliative care as an emerging role for respiratory health professionals: Findings from a cross-sectional, exploratory Canadian survey
Introduction Respiratory Health Professionals (RHPs) with specialty training in the management of asthma and COPD, often care for patients with advanced respiratory disease, who have less access to palliative care than patients with similar disease burden. The aims of this study were to: (i) explore the current and desired roles of RHPs in terms of palliative care and (ii) examine barriers to discussions with patients about palliative care. Methods An online survey addressing the aims of this study was developed and pilot tested. The survey was distributed nationally using the database of the Lung Association’s RESPTREC respiratory educator training program. Descriptive statistics were performed. Results A total of 123 completed surveys were returned, with respiratory therapists comprising the largest group of respondents. The majority indicated that end-of-life care was less than optimal for patients with advanced respiratory illnesses and agreed that palliative care should be a role of RHPs. Patient- and family-related barriers to having end-of-life discussions included: difficulty accepting prognosis, limitations and complications, and lack of capacity. For providers, the most important barriers were: lack of training, uncertainty about prognosis, and lack of time. The health care system barriers of concern were increasing demand for palliative care services and limited accessibility of palliative care for those with advanced respiratory diseases and difficulties in accurate prognostication for these conditions. Discussion Incorporating a more defined role in palliative care was generally seen as a desirable evolution of the RHP role. A number of strategies to mitigate identified barriers to discussions with the patient are described. Better alignment of the services required with the needs of patients with advanced respiratory disease can be addressed in a number of ways. Conclusions As RHP roles continue to evolve, consideration should be given to the ways in which RHPs can contribute to improving the quality of care for patients with advanced respiratory disease. Building collaborations with RHPs, palliative care, and other existing health programs can ensure high quality of care. Creating and taking advantage of learning opportunities to build skills and comfort in using a palliative approach will benefit respiratory patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信