哪些人使用药物检查服务?评估2018年英语节的吸收和结果

IF 1.3 Q4 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
F. Measham, H. Simmons
{"title":"哪些人使用药物检查服务?评估2018年英语节的吸收和结果","authors":"F. Measham, H. Simmons","doi":"10.1108/dhs-02-2022-0008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to assess service user characteristics, uptake and outcomes for drug checking services offered to over 250,000 English festival-goers in summer 2018 and to compare findings with earlier years, wider festival-goers and the general population.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nA total of 2,672 substances of concern were submitted by the public and tested by chemists in mobile laboratories on 24 show days at seven festivals. Results were embedded in 2,043 individually tailored brief interventions (BI) delivered by health professionals to 4,240 service users. Comparative data were collected through anonymous self-report surveys with 1,291 respondents at five of the same festivals.\n\n\nFindings\nThree percent of drug-using festival-goers received BI, 95% of whom had not previously accessed health services regarding their alcohol or other drug use. Drug checking service users were significantly more likely to be younger, male and past month polydrug users with a wider range of drugs consumed in the last month compared with the general festival population. For samples matching purchase intent, nearly half intended to reduce dosage, with younger and female service users significantly more likely to reduce dosage. For substances identified as other than expected, nearly two thirds disposed of them.\n\n\nSocial implications\nFestivals are potential sites to deliver innovative health interventions and to monitor their outcomes, reduce the risk of poisoning and overdose, and facilitate access to follow-up support services.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study suggests that there is value in event-based services that provide risk reduction communications directly to young adults engaged in higher risk drug use compared with wider event and general populations.\n","PeriodicalId":72849,"journal":{"name":"Drugs, habits and social policy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Who uses drug checking services? Assessing uptake and outcomes at English festivals in 2018\",\"authors\":\"F. Measham, H. Simmons\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/dhs-02-2022-0008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to assess service user characteristics, uptake and outcomes for drug checking services offered to over 250,000 English festival-goers in summer 2018 and to compare findings with earlier years, wider festival-goers and the general population.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nA total of 2,672 substances of concern were submitted by the public and tested by chemists in mobile laboratories on 24 show days at seven festivals. Results were embedded in 2,043 individually tailored brief interventions (BI) delivered by health professionals to 4,240 service users. Comparative data were collected through anonymous self-report surveys with 1,291 respondents at five of the same festivals.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThree percent of drug-using festival-goers received BI, 95% of whom had not previously accessed health services regarding their alcohol or other drug use. Drug checking service users were significantly more likely to be younger, male and past month polydrug users with a wider range of drugs consumed in the last month compared with the general festival population. For samples matching purchase intent, nearly half intended to reduce dosage, with younger and female service users significantly more likely to reduce dosage. For substances identified as other than expected, nearly two thirds disposed of them.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nFestivals are potential sites to deliver innovative health interventions and to monitor their outcomes, reduce the risk of poisoning and overdose, and facilitate access to follow-up support services.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study suggests that there is value in event-based services that provide risk reduction communications directly to young adults engaged in higher risk drug use compared with wider event and general populations.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":72849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs, habits and social policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-02-2022-0008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs, habits and social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dhs-02-2022-0008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在评估2018年夏季向25万多名英国节日观众提供的药物检查服务的服务用户特征、吸收情况和结果,并将研究结果与前几年、更广泛的节日观众和普通人群进行比较。设计/方法/方法共有2,672种值得关注的物质由公众提交,化学家在7个节日的24个展期在流动实验室进行了测试。结果被纳入由卫生专业人员向4,240名服务使用者提供的2,043项量身定制的简短干预措施(BI)。通过匿名自我报告调查,在五个相同的节日中收集了1291名受访者的比较数据。研究结果:3%的吸毒节日参与者接受了BI,其中95%的人以前没有因酒精或其他药物使用而接受过卫生服务。药物检查服务的使用者更可能是年轻人、男性和过去一个月服用多种药物的人,与一般节日人口相比,他们在过去一个月服用的药物范围更广。对于符合购买意图的样品,近一半的人打算减少剂量,年轻和女性服务用户明显更有可能减少剂量。对于被确定为与预期不同的物质,近三分之二的物质被处置。社会影响节日是提供创新卫生干预措施和监测其结果、减少中毒和过量用药风险以及促进获得后续支助服务的潜在场所。独创性/价值本研究表明,与更广泛的事件和一般人群相比,基于事件的服务可以直接向从事高风险药物使用的年轻人提供降低风险的沟通,这是有价值的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Who uses drug checking services? Assessing uptake and outcomes at English festivals in 2018
Purpose This study aims to assess service user characteristics, uptake and outcomes for drug checking services offered to over 250,000 English festival-goers in summer 2018 and to compare findings with earlier years, wider festival-goers and the general population. Design/methodology/approach A total of 2,672 substances of concern were submitted by the public and tested by chemists in mobile laboratories on 24 show days at seven festivals. Results were embedded in 2,043 individually tailored brief interventions (BI) delivered by health professionals to 4,240 service users. Comparative data were collected through anonymous self-report surveys with 1,291 respondents at five of the same festivals. Findings Three percent of drug-using festival-goers received BI, 95% of whom had not previously accessed health services regarding their alcohol or other drug use. Drug checking service users were significantly more likely to be younger, male and past month polydrug users with a wider range of drugs consumed in the last month compared with the general festival population. For samples matching purchase intent, nearly half intended to reduce dosage, with younger and female service users significantly more likely to reduce dosage. For substances identified as other than expected, nearly two thirds disposed of them. Social implications Festivals are potential sites to deliver innovative health interventions and to monitor their outcomes, reduce the risk of poisoning and overdose, and facilitate access to follow-up support services. Originality/value This study suggests that there is value in event-based services that provide risk reduction communications directly to young adults engaged in higher risk drug use compared with wider event and general populations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信