把愿景放在他们的位置:能源系统脱碳的负责任的研究和创新

IF 3.9 1区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Christopher Groves, K. Henwood, N. Pidgeon, C. Cherry, E. Roberts, F. Shirani, G. Thomas
{"title":"把愿景放在他们的位置:能源系统脱碳的负责任的研究和创新","authors":"Christopher Groves, K. Henwood, N. Pidgeon, C. Cherry, E. Roberts, F. Shirani, G. Thomas","doi":"10.1080/23299460.2022.2149954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Decarbonizing energy systems is an ambitious sociotechnical project, and will have signi fi cant implications for social justice, given the increasing dependence of societies globally on energy services. Eliciting non-expert values and perspectives to help re fl ect on the desirability of visions of socio-technical change has long been promoted within RRI. However, RRI has focused on speci fi c technological proposals and visions, and not encompassed socio-technical systems. Decarbonizing energy requires systemic change involving socio-technical con fi gurations that will vary depending upon geographical constraints and community needs in their host locations. Our case study from Wales, UK shows how fi ndings from interpretative risk research and scholarship on energy and everyday life can help design upstream participatory processes that address simultaneously systems, e ff ects on place, and everyday life. Engaging community residents through community mapping explores these dimensions of energy transition, enriching and enlarging understandings of both local and systemic aspects of the energy transition.","PeriodicalId":46727,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Putting visions in their place: responsible research and innovation for energy system decarbonization\",\"authors\":\"Christopher Groves, K. Henwood, N. Pidgeon, C. Cherry, E. Roberts, F. Shirani, G. Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23299460.2022.2149954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Decarbonizing energy systems is an ambitious sociotechnical project, and will have signi fi cant implications for social justice, given the increasing dependence of societies globally on energy services. Eliciting non-expert values and perspectives to help re fl ect on the desirability of visions of socio-technical change has long been promoted within RRI. However, RRI has focused on speci fi c technological proposals and visions, and not encompassed socio-technical systems. Decarbonizing energy requires systemic change involving socio-technical con fi gurations that will vary depending upon geographical constraints and community needs in their host locations. Our case study from Wales, UK shows how fi ndings from interpretative risk research and scholarship on energy and everyday life can help design upstream participatory processes that address simultaneously systems, e ff ects on place, and everyday life. Engaging community residents through community mapping explores these dimensions of energy transition, enriching and enlarging understandings of both local and systemic aspects of the energy transition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Responsible Innovation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Responsible Innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2149954\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Responsible Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2022.2149954","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

能源系统脱碳是一项雄心勃勃的社会技术项目,鉴于全球社会对能源服务的依赖日益增加,它将对社会正义产生重大影响。激发非专家的价值观和观点,以帮助反思社会技术变革愿景的可取性,长期以来一直在RRI内部得到促进。然而,RRI侧重于具体的技术建议和愿景,而不包括社会技术系统。使能源脱碳需要涉及社会技术结构的系统性变革,而社会技术结构将因其所在地区的地理限制和社区需求而异。我们在英国威尔士的案例研究表明,解释性风险研究以及能源和日常生活方面的学术研究成果可以帮助设计上游参与式流程,同时解决系统、对地方和日常生活的影响。通过社区测绘吸引社区居民探索能源转型的这些维度,丰富和扩大对能源转型的地方和系统方面的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Putting visions in their place: responsible research and innovation for energy system decarbonization
Decarbonizing energy systems is an ambitious sociotechnical project, and will have signi fi cant implications for social justice, given the increasing dependence of societies globally on energy services. Eliciting non-expert values and perspectives to help re fl ect on the desirability of visions of socio-technical change has long been promoted within RRI. However, RRI has focused on speci fi c technological proposals and visions, and not encompassed socio-technical systems. Decarbonizing energy requires systemic change involving socio-technical con fi gurations that will vary depending upon geographical constraints and community needs in their host locations. Our case study from Wales, UK shows how fi ndings from interpretative risk research and scholarship on energy and everyday life can help design upstream participatory processes that address simultaneously systems, e ff ects on place, and everyday life. Engaging community residents through community mapping explores these dimensions of energy transition, enriching and enlarging understandings of both local and systemic aspects of the energy transition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
20.50%
发文量
26
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Responsible Innovation (JRI) provides a forum for discussions of the normative assessment and governance of knowledge-based innovation. JRI offers humanists, social scientists, policy analysts and legal scholars, and natural scientists and engineers an opportunity to articulate, strengthen, and critique the relations among approaches to responsible innovation, thus giving further shape to a newly emerging community of research and practice. These approaches include ethics, technology assessment, governance, sustainability, socio-technical integration, and others. JRI intends responsible innovation to be inclusive of such terms as responsible development and sustainable development, and the journal invites comparisons and contrasts among such concepts. While issues of risk and environmental health and safety are relevant, JRI especially encourages attention to the assessment of the broader and more subtle human and social dimensions of innovation—including moral, cultural, political, and religious dimensions, social risk, and sustainability addressed in a systemic fashion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信