基于谱图和尺度图的低截获概率跳频信号特性比较

Daniel L. Stevens, S. Schuckers
{"title":"基于谱图和尺度图的低截获概率跳频信号特性比较","authors":"Daniel L. Stevens, S. Schuckers","doi":"10.34257/GJREJVOL16IS2PG13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Low probability of intercept radar signals, which are often problematic to detect and characterize, have as their goal ‘to see and not be seen’. Digital intercept receivers are currently moving away from Fourier-based analysis and towards classical time-frequency analysis techniques for the purpose of analyzing these low probability of intercept radar signals. This paper presents the novel approach of characterizing low probability of intercept frequency hopping radar signals through utilization and direct comparison of the Spectrogram versus the Scalogram. Two different frequency hopping low probability of intercept radar signals were analyzed(4-component and 8-component). The following metrics were used for evaluation: percent error of: carrier frequency, modulation bandwidth, modulation period, and timefrequency localization. Also used were: percent detection, lowest signal-to-noise ratio for signal detection, and plot (processing) time. Experimental results demonstrate that overall, the Scalogram produced more accurate characterization metrics than the Spectrogram. An improvement in performance may well translate into saved equipment and lives.","PeriodicalId":12520,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Research In Engineering","volume":"10 1","pages":"13-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Probability of Intercept Frequency Hopping Signal Characterization Comparison using the Spectrogram and the Scalogram\",\"authors\":\"Daniel L. Stevens, S. Schuckers\",\"doi\":\"10.34257/GJREJVOL16IS2PG13\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Low probability of intercept radar signals, which are often problematic to detect and characterize, have as their goal ‘to see and not be seen’. Digital intercept receivers are currently moving away from Fourier-based analysis and towards classical time-frequency analysis techniques for the purpose of analyzing these low probability of intercept radar signals. This paper presents the novel approach of characterizing low probability of intercept frequency hopping radar signals through utilization and direct comparison of the Spectrogram versus the Scalogram. Two different frequency hopping low probability of intercept radar signals were analyzed(4-component and 8-component). The following metrics were used for evaluation: percent error of: carrier frequency, modulation bandwidth, modulation period, and timefrequency localization. Also used were: percent detection, lowest signal-to-noise ratio for signal detection, and plot (processing) time. Experimental results demonstrate that overall, the Scalogram produced more accurate characterization metrics than the Spectrogram. An improvement in performance may well translate into saved equipment and lives.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12520,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Journal of Research In Engineering\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"13-23\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Journal of Research In Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.34257/GJREJVOL16IS2PG13\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Research In Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34257/GJREJVOL16IS2PG13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

拦截雷达信号的概率低,探测和表征往往有问题,它们的目标是“看见而不被看见”。数字拦截接收机目前正在从基于傅里叶的分析转向经典的时频分析技术,目的是分析这些低概率拦截雷达信号。本文提出了一种利用谱图和尺度图的直接比较来表征低截获概率跳频雷达信号的新方法。分析了两种不同跳频低概率截获雷达信号(4分量和8分量)。以下指标用于评估:载波频率、调制带宽、调制周期和时频定位的误差百分比。还使用了:百分比检测,信号检测的最低信噪比和绘图(处理)时间。实验结果表明,总体而言,尺度图比谱图产生更准确的表征指标。性能的提高很可能转化为节省设备和生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low Probability of Intercept Frequency Hopping Signal Characterization Comparison using the Spectrogram and the Scalogram
Low probability of intercept radar signals, which are often problematic to detect and characterize, have as their goal ‘to see and not be seen’. Digital intercept receivers are currently moving away from Fourier-based analysis and towards classical time-frequency analysis techniques for the purpose of analyzing these low probability of intercept radar signals. This paper presents the novel approach of characterizing low probability of intercept frequency hopping radar signals through utilization and direct comparison of the Spectrogram versus the Scalogram. Two different frequency hopping low probability of intercept radar signals were analyzed(4-component and 8-component). The following metrics were used for evaluation: percent error of: carrier frequency, modulation bandwidth, modulation period, and timefrequency localization. Also used were: percent detection, lowest signal-to-noise ratio for signal detection, and plot (processing) time. Experimental results demonstrate that overall, the Scalogram produced more accurate characterization metrics than the Spectrogram. An improvement in performance may well translate into saved equipment and lives.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信