选择逻辑及其计算性质

M. Bernreiter, Jan Maly, S. Woltran
{"title":"选择逻辑及其计算性质","authors":"M. Bernreiter, Jan Maly, S. Woltran","doi":"10.24963/ijcai.2021/247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Qualitative Choice Logic (QCL) and Conjunctive Choice Logic (CCL) are formalisms for preference handling, with especially QCL being well established in the field of AI. So far, analyses of these logics need to be done on a case-by-case basis, albeit they share several common features. This calls for a more general choice logic framework, with QCL and CCL as well as some of their derivatives being particular instantiations. We provide such a framework, which allows us, on the one hand, to easily define new choice logics and, on the other hand, to examine properties of different choice logics in a uniform setting. In particular, we investigate strong equivalence, a core concept in non-classical logics for understanding formula simplification, and computational complexity. Our analysis also yields new results for QCL and CCL. For example, we show that the main reasoning task regarding preferred models is ϴ₂P-complete for QCL and CCL, while being Δ₂P-complete for a newly introduced choice logic.","PeriodicalId":8496,"journal":{"name":"Artif. Intell.","volume":"1 1","pages":"103755"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Choice Logics and Their Computational Properties\",\"authors\":\"M. Bernreiter, Jan Maly, S. Woltran\",\"doi\":\"10.24963/ijcai.2021/247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Qualitative Choice Logic (QCL) and Conjunctive Choice Logic (CCL) are formalisms for preference handling, with especially QCL being well established in the field of AI. So far, analyses of these logics need to be done on a case-by-case basis, albeit they share several common features. This calls for a more general choice logic framework, with QCL and CCL as well as some of their derivatives being particular instantiations. We provide such a framework, which allows us, on the one hand, to easily define new choice logics and, on the other hand, to examine properties of different choice logics in a uniform setting. In particular, we investigate strong equivalence, a core concept in non-classical logics for understanding formula simplification, and computational complexity. Our analysis also yields new results for QCL and CCL. For example, we show that the main reasoning task regarding preferred models is ϴ₂P-complete for QCL and CCL, while being Δ₂P-complete for a newly introduced choice logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Artif. Intell.\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"103755\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Artif. Intell.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/247\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Artif. Intell.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24963/ijcai.2021/247","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

定性选择逻辑(QCL)和连接选择逻辑(CCL)是处理偏好的形式化方法,特别是QCL在人工智能领域得到了很好的应用。到目前为止,对这些逻辑的分析需要逐个进行,尽管它们有几个共同的特性。这需要一个更通用的选择逻辑框架,使用QCL和CCL以及它们的一些衍生产品作为特定的实例。我们提供了这样一个框架,一方面,它允许我们轻松地定义新的选择逻辑,另一方面,在统一的设置中检查不同选择逻辑的属性。特别地,我们研究了强等价,这是非经典逻辑中理解公式简化和计算复杂性的核心概念。我们的分析也对QCL和CCL产生了新的结果。例如,我们证明了关于首选模型的主要推理任务对于QCL和CCL是ϴ₂P-complete,而对于新引入的选择逻辑是Δ₂P-complete。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Choice Logics and Their Computational Properties
Qualitative Choice Logic (QCL) and Conjunctive Choice Logic (CCL) are formalisms for preference handling, with especially QCL being well established in the field of AI. So far, analyses of these logics need to be done on a case-by-case basis, albeit they share several common features. This calls for a more general choice logic framework, with QCL and CCL as well as some of their derivatives being particular instantiations. We provide such a framework, which allows us, on the one hand, to easily define new choice logics and, on the other hand, to examine properties of different choice logics in a uniform setting. In particular, we investigate strong equivalence, a core concept in non-classical logics for understanding formula simplification, and computational complexity. Our analysis also yields new results for QCL and CCL. For example, we show that the main reasoning task regarding preferred models is ϴ₂P-complete for QCL and CCL, while being Δ₂P-complete for a newly introduced choice logic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信