4B-4三维合成孔径聚焦的精确飞行时间计算

H. Andresen, S. Nikolov, J. A. Jensen
{"title":"4B-4三维合成孔径聚焦的精确飞行时间计算","authors":"H. Andresen, S. Nikolov, J. A. Jensen","doi":"10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional linear arrays can be used for 3D ultrasound imaging, by moving the array in the elevation direction and stacking the planes in a volume. The point spread function (PSF) is larger in the elevation plane, as the aperture is smaller and has a fixed elevation focus. Resolution improvements in elevation can be achieved by applying synthetic aperture (SA) focusing to the beamformed in-plane RF-data. The method uses a virtual source (VS) placed at the elevation focus for post-beamforming. This has previously been done in two steps, in plane focusing followed by SA post-focusing in elevation, because of a lack of a simple expression for the exact time of flight (ToF). This paper presents a new method for calculating the ToF for a 3D case in a single step using a spherical defocused emission from a linear array. The method is evaluated using both simulated data obtained by Field II and phantom measurements using the RASMUS experimental scanner. For the simulation, scatterers were placed from 20 to 120 mm of depth. A point and a cyst phantom were scanned by translating a 7 MHz linear array in the elevation direction. For a point placed at (25,8, 75) mm relative to the transducer, the mean error between the calculated and estimated ToF is 0.0129 mus (0.09A), and the standard deviation of the ToF error is 0.0049A. SA focusing improves both contrast and resolution. For simulated scatterers at depths of 40 and 70 mm the FWHM is 83.6% and 46.8% of the FWHM without elevation SA focusing. The main-lobe to side-lobe energy ratio (MLSLR) for the scatterers is 32.3 dB and 29.1 dB. The measurement of a PSF phantom at a depth of 65 mm shows a relative FWHM of 27.8%. For an elevation sampling distance of 0.63 mm, the MLSLR for the two simulated scatterers is 26.4 dB and 27.9 dB. For the point phantom the MLSLR is 16.3 dB. If the elevation sampling distance is increased to 0.99 mm, the two simulated scatterers have a MLSLR of 21.1 dB and 15.8 dB respectively, and the point phantom has an MLSLR of 5.2 dB. The cyst phantom shows an improvement of 5.8 dB in contrast to noise ratio, for a 4 mm cyst, when elevation focusing is applied.","PeriodicalId":6355,"journal":{"name":"2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings","volume":"57 1","pages":"224-227"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"4B-4 Precise Time-of-Flight Calculation For 3D Synthetic Aperture Focusing\",\"authors\":\"H. Andresen, S. Nikolov, J. A. Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Conventional linear arrays can be used for 3D ultrasound imaging, by moving the array in the elevation direction and stacking the planes in a volume. The point spread function (PSF) is larger in the elevation plane, as the aperture is smaller and has a fixed elevation focus. Resolution improvements in elevation can be achieved by applying synthetic aperture (SA) focusing to the beamformed in-plane RF-data. The method uses a virtual source (VS) placed at the elevation focus for post-beamforming. This has previously been done in two steps, in plane focusing followed by SA post-focusing in elevation, because of a lack of a simple expression for the exact time of flight (ToF). This paper presents a new method for calculating the ToF for a 3D case in a single step using a spherical defocused emission from a linear array. The method is evaluated using both simulated data obtained by Field II and phantom measurements using the RASMUS experimental scanner. For the simulation, scatterers were placed from 20 to 120 mm of depth. A point and a cyst phantom were scanned by translating a 7 MHz linear array in the elevation direction. For a point placed at (25,8, 75) mm relative to the transducer, the mean error between the calculated and estimated ToF is 0.0129 mus (0.09A), and the standard deviation of the ToF error is 0.0049A. SA focusing improves both contrast and resolution. For simulated scatterers at depths of 40 and 70 mm the FWHM is 83.6% and 46.8% of the FWHM without elevation SA focusing. The main-lobe to side-lobe energy ratio (MLSLR) for the scatterers is 32.3 dB and 29.1 dB. The measurement of a PSF phantom at a depth of 65 mm shows a relative FWHM of 27.8%. For an elevation sampling distance of 0.63 mm, the MLSLR for the two simulated scatterers is 26.4 dB and 27.9 dB. For the point phantom the MLSLR is 16.3 dB. If the elevation sampling distance is increased to 0.99 mm, the two simulated scatterers have a MLSLR of 21.1 dB and 15.8 dB respectively, and the point phantom has an MLSLR of 5.2 dB. The cyst phantom shows an improvement of 5.8 dB in contrast to noise ratio, for a 4 mm cyst, when elevation focusing is applied.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"224-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2007 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ULTSYM.2007.67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

传统的线性阵列可以用于三维超声成像,通过在仰角方向移动阵列并将平面堆叠在一个体积中。由于光圈较小且具有固定的仰角焦点,因此在仰角平面上点扩展函数(PSF)较大。通过对波束形成的面内射频数据进行合成孔径(SA)聚焦,可以实现高程分辨率的提高。该方法使用一个虚拟源(VS)放置在仰角焦点后波束形成。由于缺乏精确的飞行时间(ToF)的简单表达式,这在之前的两个步骤中完成,在平面聚焦中,然后在仰角上进行SA后聚焦。本文提出了一种利用线性阵列球面离焦发射单步计算三维情况下ToF的新方法。该方法是通过实地II获得的模拟数据和使用RASMUS实验扫描仪的幻影测量来评估的。在模拟中,散射体被放置在20到120毫米的深度。通过在仰角方向平移7mhz线性阵列扫描点和囊肿幻象。对于相对于传感器放置在(25,8,75)mm处的点,计算和估计的ToF之间的平均误差为0.0129 mus (0.09A), ToF误差的标准偏差为0.0049A。SA聚焦提高了对比度和分辨率。对于深度为40 mm和70 mm的散射体,无仰角SA聚焦时的FWHM分别为83.6%和46.8%。散射体的主副瓣能量比分别为32.3 dB和29.1 dB。在65mm深度处的PSF模体测量显示相对FWHM为27.8%。当仰角采样距离为0.63 mm时,两种散射体的最大单波比分别为26.4 dB和27.9 dB。对于点模体,最大单反比为16.3 dB。当高程采样距离增加到0.99 mm时,两个仿真散射体的最大单波比分别为21.1 dB和15.8 dB,点模体的最大单波比为5.2 dB。对于一个4mm的囊肿,当应用仰角聚焦时,囊肿幻象的噪声比提高了5.8 dB。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
4B-4 Precise Time-of-Flight Calculation For 3D Synthetic Aperture Focusing
Conventional linear arrays can be used for 3D ultrasound imaging, by moving the array in the elevation direction and stacking the planes in a volume. The point spread function (PSF) is larger in the elevation plane, as the aperture is smaller and has a fixed elevation focus. Resolution improvements in elevation can be achieved by applying synthetic aperture (SA) focusing to the beamformed in-plane RF-data. The method uses a virtual source (VS) placed at the elevation focus for post-beamforming. This has previously been done in two steps, in plane focusing followed by SA post-focusing in elevation, because of a lack of a simple expression for the exact time of flight (ToF). This paper presents a new method for calculating the ToF for a 3D case in a single step using a spherical defocused emission from a linear array. The method is evaluated using both simulated data obtained by Field II and phantom measurements using the RASMUS experimental scanner. For the simulation, scatterers were placed from 20 to 120 mm of depth. A point and a cyst phantom were scanned by translating a 7 MHz linear array in the elevation direction. For a point placed at (25,8, 75) mm relative to the transducer, the mean error between the calculated and estimated ToF is 0.0129 mus (0.09A), and the standard deviation of the ToF error is 0.0049A. SA focusing improves both contrast and resolution. For simulated scatterers at depths of 40 and 70 mm the FWHM is 83.6% and 46.8% of the FWHM without elevation SA focusing. The main-lobe to side-lobe energy ratio (MLSLR) for the scatterers is 32.3 dB and 29.1 dB. The measurement of a PSF phantom at a depth of 65 mm shows a relative FWHM of 27.8%. For an elevation sampling distance of 0.63 mm, the MLSLR for the two simulated scatterers is 26.4 dB and 27.9 dB. For the point phantom the MLSLR is 16.3 dB. If the elevation sampling distance is increased to 0.99 mm, the two simulated scatterers have a MLSLR of 21.1 dB and 15.8 dB respectively, and the point phantom has an MLSLR of 5.2 dB. The cyst phantom shows an improvement of 5.8 dB in contrast to noise ratio, for a 4 mm cyst, when elevation focusing is applied.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信