晶状体触觉平面(LHP)是人工晶状体植入式屈光度计算的固定参考

N.E. Sverker Norrby
{"title":"晶状体触觉平面(LHP)是人工晶状体植入式屈光度计算的固定参考","authors":"N.E. Sverker Norrby","doi":"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80035-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> To establish an unambiguous method to assign A-constants and similar constants required by the various formulas in use for the calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) implant power, without recourse to clinical investigations. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of clinical data involving widely different IOL designs and several surgeons was performed to find the position of the lens haptic plane (LHP). The clinical data had been generated previously for entirely different purposes. Inclusion criteria were visual acuity of 0.5 (20/40) or better and availability of a postoperatively (3-12 months) measured ACD (distance from anterior cornea to anterior IOL). Ray-tracing calculations were performed to find the ACD compatible with the optical data (preoperative L and K, and IOL power). The exact design (front and back radii, and central thickness) of the IOL was used in these calculations. The calculated ACD was verified against the postoperatively measured ACD. Lens haptic plane was calculated from ACD using the geometry of each particular design. <strong>RESULTS:</strong> Data from 688 cases, 8 different clinics and 4 IOL models were analysed. On average the calculated ACD coincided with the postoperatively measured ACD when applying paraxial ray-tracing and thick lens theory (Gaussian optics). An average eye with K = 43.63 D, L = 23.24 mm and LHP = 4.02 mm was established. For any new IOL design, the power to make this average eye emmetropic can be determined by applying paraxial ray-tracing. Subsequently the A-constant or any other formula constant can be determined. <strong>LEMMA:</strong> There is no need to utilize constants inherent to various formulas. The calculation model used to find the constants could just as well be used directly to find the exact implant power, provided that the position of the LHP is known and that the manufacturer supplies the necessary design information. Because the LHP concept is independent of IOL model, the advantage would be that the surgeon could concentrate on refining his technique to estimate LHP preoperatively, rather than personalizing constants for every new IOL model.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100500,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","volume":"7 4","pages":"Pages 202-209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80035-4","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lens Haptic Plane (LHP) a Fixed Reference for IOL Implant Power Calculation\",\"authors\":\"N.E. Sverker Norrby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80035-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><strong>OBJECTIVE:</strong> To establish an unambiguous method to assign A-constants and similar constants required by the various formulas in use for the calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) implant power, without recourse to clinical investigations. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of clinical data involving widely different IOL designs and several surgeons was performed to find the position of the lens haptic plane (LHP). The clinical data had been generated previously for entirely different purposes. Inclusion criteria were visual acuity of 0.5 (20/40) or better and availability of a postoperatively (3-12 months) measured ACD (distance from anterior cornea to anterior IOL). Ray-tracing calculations were performed to find the ACD compatible with the optical data (preoperative L and K, and IOL power). The exact design (front and back radii, and central thickness) of the IOL was used in these calculations. The calculated ACD was verified against the postoperatively measured ACD. Lens haptic plane was calculated from ACD using the geometry of each particular design. <strong>RESULTS:</strong> Data from 688 cases, 8 different clinics and 4 IOL models were analysed. On average the calculated ACD coincided with the postoperatively measured ACD when applying paraxial ray-tracing and thick lens theory (Gaussian optics). An average eye with K = 43.63 D, L = 23.24 mm and LHP = 4.02 mm was established. For any new IOL design, the power to make this average eye emmetropic can be determined by applying paraxial ray-tracing. Subsequently the A-constant or any other formula constant can be determined. <strong>LEMMA:</strong> There is no need to utilize constants inherent to various formulas. The calculation model used to find the constants could just as well be used directly to find the exact implant power, provided that the position of the LHP is known and that the manufacturer supplies the necessary design information. Because the LHP concept is independent of IOL model, the advantage would be that the surgeon could concentrate on refining his technique to estimate LHP preoperatively, rather than personalizing constants for every new IOL model.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"volume\":\"7 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 202-209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0955-3681(13)80035-4\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800354\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Implant and Refractive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955368113800354","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

目的:在不依赖临床调查的情况下,建立一种明确的方法来确定人工晶状体(IOL)人工晶状体度数计算公式中所需的a常数及类似常数。方法:回顾性分析不同人工晶状体设计和不同术者的临床资料,确定晶状体触觉平面(LHP)的位置。这些临床数据之前是为了完全不同的目的而生成的。纳入标准为视力0.5(20/40)或更高,术后(3-12个月)测量ACD(前角膜到前人工晶状体的距离)的可用性。进行光线追踪计算,找出ACD与光学数据(术前L和K,以及IOL度数)相匹配。在这些计算中使用了IOL的精确设计(前后半径和中心厚度)。计算的ACD与术后测量的ACD进行验证。镜头的触觉平面由ACD计算,利用每个特定设计的几何形状。结果:分析了688例患者、8个不同临床、4种人工晶状体模型的数据。应用近轴射线追踪和厚透镜理论(高斯光学)计算的平均ACD与术后测量的ACD一致。平均眼K = 43.63 D, L = 23.24 mm, LHP = 4.02 mm。对于任何新的人工晶状体设计,可以通过应用近轴光线追踪来确定平均眼睛的反射能力。随后,a常数或其他公式常数就可以确定了。引理:没有必要利用各种公式的固有常数。如果LHP的位置已知,并且制造商提供了必要的设计信息,那么用于确定常数的计算模型也可以直接用于确定确切的植入功率。由于LHP的概念是独立于IOL模型的,其优点是外科医生可以集中精力改进术前估计LHP的技术,而不是为每个新的IOL模型个性化常数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Lens Haptic Plane (LHP) a Fixed Reference for IOL Implant Power Calculation

OBJECTIVE: To establish an unambiguous method to assign A-constants and similar constants required by the various formulas in use for the calculation of intraocular lens (IOL) implant power, without recourse to clinical investigations. METHOD: Retrospective analysis of clinical data involving widely different IOL designs and several surgeons was performed to find the position of the lens haptic plane (LHP). The clinical data had been generated previously for entirely different purposes. Inclusion criteria were visual acuity of 0.5 (20/40) or better and availability of a postoperatively (3-12 months) measured ACD (distance from anterior cornea to anterior IOL). Ray-tracing calculations were performed to find the ACD compatible with the optical data (preoperative L and K, and IOL power). The exact design (front and back radii, and central thickness) of the IOL was used in these calculations. The calculated ACD was verified against the postoperatively measured ACD. Lens haptic plane was calculated from ACD using the geometry of each particular design. RESULTS: Data from 688 cases, 8 different clinics and 4 IOL models were analysed. On average the calculated ACD coincided with the postoperatively measured ACD when applying paraxial ray-tracing and thick lens theory (Gaussian optics). An average eye with K = 43.63 D, L = 23.24 mm and LHP = 4.02 mm was established. For any new IOL design, the power to make this average eye emmetropic can be determined by applying paraxial ray-tracing. Subsequently the A-constant or any other formula constant can be determined. LEMMA: There is no need to utilize constants inherent to various formulas. The calculation model used to find the constants could just as well be used directly to find the exact implant power, provided that the position of the LHP is known and that the manufacturer supplies the necessary design information. Because the LHP concept is independent of IOL model, the advantage would be that the surgeon could concentrate on refining his technique to estimate LHP preoperatively, rather than personalizing constants for every new IOL model.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信