进化中的认知不公正概念。

IF 0.4 0 PHILOSOPHY

Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica Pub Date : 2021-06-07 DOI:10.5209/ltdl.76466

Miranda Fricker

{"title":"进化中的认知不公正概念。","authors":"Miranda Fricker","doi":"10.5209/ltdl.76466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Este texto es la traducción del capítulo cuarto de The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (2017), editado por Ian James Kidd, José Medina y Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. En él, Miranda Fricker aclara y delimita los conceptos de injusticia hermenéutica y testimonial, proporcionando ejemplos, narrando su genealogía, respondiendo a algunas de las críticas que recibieron estos conceptos, así como estableciendo relaciones de semejanza y contraste con otras concepciones de la justicia y otras ramas de la filosofía","PeriodicalId":40567,"journal":{"name":"Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptos de injusticia epistémica en evolución.\",\"authors\":\"Miranda Fricker\",\"doi\":\"10.5209/ltdl.76466\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Este texto es la traducción del capítulo cuarto de The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (2017), editado por Ian James Kidd, José Medina y Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. En él, Miranda Fricker aclara y delimita los conceptos de injusticia hermenéutica y testimonial, proporcionando ejemplos, narrando su genealogía, respondiendo a algunas de las críticas que recibieron estos conceptos, así como estableciendo relaciones de semejanza y contraste con otras concepciones de la justicia y otras ramas de la filosofía\",\"PeriodicalId\":40567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.76466\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5209/ltdl.76466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

这个文本的翻译是Routledge手册》第四章的Epistemic Injustice(2017年)、编辑伊恩·詹姆斯·基德、jose Medina和Gaile Pohlhaus Jr .,米兰达·弗里克澄清和证人的非正义解释学和概念,需提供,narrando家谱,回答一些批评了这些概念,并建立与其他正义概念和其他哲学分支的相似和对比关系

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Conceptos de injusticia epistémica en evolución.

Este texto es la traducción del capítulo cuarto de The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice (2017), editado por Ian James Kidd, José Medina y Gaile Pohlhaus Jr. En él, Miranda Fricker aclara y delimita los conceptos de injusticia hermenéutica y testimonial, proporcionando ejemplos, narrando su genealogía, respondiendo a algunas de las críticas que recibieron estos conceptos, así como estableciendo relaciones de semejanza y contraste con otras concepciones de la justicia y otras ramas de la filosofía

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Torres de Lucca-Revista Internacional de Filosofia Politica PHILOSOPHY-

CiteScore

0.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

22 weeks

期刊介绍： The scientific scope of Las Torres de Lucca (International Journal of Political Philosophy) will be to comprehend the characteristics of political philosophy, in line with the interdisciplinary character that has operated in this field during the last several years. We welcome contributions from the areas traditionally linked directly to political philosophy (moral philosophy, philosophy of law, political theory), as well as from those that have been incorporated up to the present day (political economy, philosophy of history, psychology, neurophysiology and, to a lesser extent, other sciences) as long as their scope is focused on the treatment of public affairs and sheds light on contemporary political reflections. In the same way, the reference to classic problems should be brought to bear on contemporary questions. The journal does not commit itself to any school of thought, style or ideology. However, we do commit ourselves to argumentative rigor and expositive clarity. Thus, the new publication is directed towards the academic environment and designed for the specialized reader; but the publication also aspires to awake interest in the reader who is not technically formed in these disciplines, but is interested by the public questions that inevitably affect him or her. We expect that the scope of the journal will be international. Thus, articles will be published in Spanish and English, and original articles in French, Portuguese, Italian, or German will be accepted as exceptions (depending on their quality and relevance), translated into Spanish and published in a bilingual format. We are particularly interested in covering the Spanish/Latin American realm, particularly lacking in specialized publications of this type. With this in mind, we count on experts from the distinct countries included in this geographic area.