{"title":"五旬节派还是重生派?划界实践对尼日利亚基督教研究的意义","authors":"Judith C. Bachmann","doi":"10.1558/PENT.37224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In recent years, the label \"Pentecostal\" has been applied widely and rather unquestioned to churches in Nigeria. Yet, in the 1990s and 2000s, a proposal was issued to study Nigerian Pentecostals in terms of their most common designation on the ground as the \"born again\" movement. Building on this approach based on observations from fieldwork in southwestern Nigeria, the article argues that the identification as \"born again\" was much more common than \"Pentecostal\", which held almost no significance on its own and did thus not really distinguish groups from each other. The emphasis on the \"born again\" experience, however, was widespread but also served to demarcate \"real\" or \"committed\" Christians from \"corrupted\" ones. This demarcation was upheld against mission churches, white garment churches and especially traditional healing practices as the source of the supposed \"corruption\". The article thus contends that even the study of \"born again\" Christianity, though based on field observations more compelling than that of \"Pentecostalism\", needs to consider the concrete and contextual boundaries drawn to establish identities such as \"born again\" and/or \"Pentecostal\".","PeriodicalId":41497,"journal":{"name":"PentecoStudies-An Interdisciplinary Journal for Research on the Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pentecostal or Born Again? The Relevance of Demarcation Practices for the Study of Nigerian Christianity\",\"authors\":\"Judith C. Bachmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/PENT.37224\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In recent years, the label \\\"Pentecostal\\\" has been applied widely and rather unquestioned to churches in Nigeria. Yet, in the 1990s and 2000s, a proposal was issued to study Nigerian Pentecostals in terms of their most common designation on the ground as the \\\"born again\\\" movement. Building on this approach based on observations from fieldwork in southwestern Nigeria, the article argues that the identification as \\\"born again\\\" was much more common than \\\"Pentecostal\\\", which held almost no significance on its own and did thus not really distinguish groups from each other. The emphasis on the \\\"born again\\\" experience, however, was widespread but also served to demarcate \\\"real\\\" or \\\"committed\\\" Christians from \\\"corrupted\\\" ones. This demarcation was upheld against mission churches, white garment churches and especially traditional healing practices as the source of the supposed \\\"corruption\\\". The article thus contends that even the study of \\\"born again\\\" Christianity, though based on field observations more compelling than that of \\\"Pentecostalism\\\", needs to consider the concrete and contextual boundaries drawn to establish identities such as \\\"born again\\\" and/or \\\"Pentecostal\\\".\",\"PeriodicalId\":41497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PentecoStudies-An Interdisciplinary Journal for Research on the Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PentecoStudies-An Interdisciplinary Journal for Research on the Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/PENT.37224\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PentecoStudies-An Interdisciplinary Journal for Research on the Pentecostal and Charismatic Movements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/PENT.37224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pentecostal or Born Again? The Relevance of Demarcation Practices for the Study of Nigerian Christianity
In recent years, the label "Pentecostal" has been applied widely and rather unquestioned to churches in Nigeria. Yet, in the 1990s and 2000s, a proposal was issued to study Nigerian Pentecostals in terms of their most common designation on the ground as the "born again" movement. Building on this approach based on observations from fieldwork in southwestern Nigeria, the article argues that the identification as "born again" was much more common than "Pentecostal", which held almost no significance on its own and did thus not really distinguish groups from each other. The emphasis on the "born again" experience, however, was widespread but also served to demarcate "real" or "committed" Christians from "corrupted" ones. This demarcation was upheld against mission churches, white garment churches and especially traditional healing practices as the source of the supposed "corruption". The article thus contends that even the study of "born again" Christianity, though based on field observations more compelling than that of "Pentecostalism", needs to consider the concrete and contextual boundaries drawn to establish identities such as "born again" and/or "Pentecostal".
期刊介绍:
PentecoStudies offers a distinctly interdisciplinary forum for the study of Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity. Authors from the social sciences, the humanities, cultural studies, religious studies and theology are all welcome to submit research on global expressions of Pentecostalism defined in its broadest sense. The journal invites work that attends to historical, contemporary and regional studies. In particular, it is interested in the global expansion of Pentecostalism, its mutations and impact on society, culture and the media, including its influence on traditional non-Pentecostal churches. Comparative research is encouraged, especially if it is based on different regional studies and contributes to our understanding of globalization and the role of Pentecostalism in post-colonial contexts. Attention to the lived experience of religion is important and studies that include empirical research are welcome, as well as theoretical studies. Theological contributions that assist our understanding of the beliefs and practices of Pentecostal Christians are essential and these are best placed if they engage in a dialogue with the broader traditions of philiosophy and theology, especially ecumenical dialogue. Finally, in this age of many faiths, it is important that the impact of Pentecostalism on other religious traditions is researched and vice versa. Pentecostal and Charismatic Christianity ("Pentecostalisms") cannot be fully appreciated in isolation but must be understood in all its complexity when it is placed in multiple contexts and viewed through multiple lenses. The journal aims to fulfil this important research need.