{"title":"中国热液矿床硼同位素地球化学初步研究","authors":"S.-Y. Jiang","doi":"10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00132-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A preliminary boron isotope study of tourmaline was carried out for a number of sediment-hosted massive sulfide deposits and granite-related hydrothermal Sn deposits in China. Tourmalines from the Yindongzi-Tongmugou (Devonian) and the Qingchengzi (Proterozoic) Pb-Zn deposits show δ<sup>11</sup>B values of −7.6 to −13.7‰, which are within the typical δ<sup>11</sup>B ranges of massive sulfide deposits worldwide. At Dachang Sn-polymetallic deposit, the hydrothermal fluids responsible for the formation of banded tourmalinites have remarkable different δ<sup>11</sup>B values (−1 to −5‰) from those of quartz-tourmaline veins near the granite contacts (∼ −10‰), which indicate their different origins. Together with other geological and geochemical evidence, the banded tourmalinites at Dachang are of submarine hydrothermal exhalative origin. Overall, the boron isotopic compositions of tourmaline from massive sulfide deposits are mainly controlled by source rock compositions, and non-marine evaporites may have played an important role in the massive sulfide ore formation in same cases. Other controlling factors include temperatures, water/rock ratios, and seawater entrainments.</p><p>Tourmalines from the granite-related Yidong Sn deposit display a gradual increase in δ<sup>11</sup>B value from within the granite (−13.9‰), to the contact (−12.7 to −11.9‰) and the country rocks (−11.4 to −11.3‰). It is suggested that these variations reflect the boron isotope fractionation during magmatic degassing and magmatic-hydrothermal ore-forming processes with <sup>11</sup>B preferentially partitioned into hydrothermal solutions. The similar and limited δ<sup>11</sup>B variations (−19.5 to −13.9‰) in granitic tourmalines from the granite-related Sn deposits in South China suggest that these Sn-rich granites may have similar source rocks from the basement of metasedimentary rocks and volcanic rocks in this region.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101024,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy","volume":"26 9","pages":"Pages 851-858"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00132-6","citationCount":"54","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Boron isotope geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits in China: a preliminary study\",\"authors\":\"S.-Y. Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00132-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A preliminary boron isotope study of tourmaline was carried out for a number of sediment-hosted massive sulfide deposits and granite-related hydrothermal Sn deposits in China. Tourmalines from the Yindongzi-Tongmugou (Devonian) and the Qingchengzi (Proterozoic) Pb-Zn deposits show δ<sup>11</sup>B values of −7.6 to −13.7‰, which are within the typical δ<sup>11</sup>B ranges of massive sulfide deposits worldwide. At Dachang Sn-polymetallic deposit, the hydrothermal fluids responsible for the formation of banded tourmalinites have remarkable different δ<sup>11</sup>B values (−1 to −5‰) from those of quartz-tourmaline veins near the granite contacts (∼ −10‰), which indicate their different origins. Together with other geological and geochemical evidence, the banded tourmalinites at Dachang are of submarine hydrothermal exhalative origin. Overall, the boron isotopic compositions of tourmaline from massive sulfide deposits are mainly controlled by source rock compositions, and non-marine evaporites may have played an important role in the massive sulfide ore formation in same cases. Other controlling factors include temperatures, water/rock ratios, and seawater entrainments.</p><p>Tourmalines from the granite-related Yidong Sn deposit display a gradual increase in δ<sup>11</sup>B value from within the granite (−13.9‰), to the contact (−12.7 to −11.9‰) and the country rocks (−11.4 to −11.3‰). It is suggested that these variations reflect the boron isotope fractionation during magmatic degassing and magmatic-hydrothermal ore-forming processes with <sup>11</sup>B preferentially partitioned into hydrothermal solutions. The similar and limited δ<sup>11</sup>B variations (−19.5 to −13.9‰) in granitic tourmalines from the granite-related Sn deposits in South China suggest that these Sn-rich granites may have similar source rocks from the basement of metasedimentary rocks and volcanic rocks in this region.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy\",\"volume\":\"26 9\",\"pages\":\"Pages 851-858\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1464-1895(01)00132-6\",\"citationCount\":\"54\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464189501001326\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Part A: Solid Earth and Geodesy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1464189501001326","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Boron isotope geochemistry of hydrothermal ore deposits in China: a preliminary study
A preliminary boron isotope study of tourmaline was carried out for a number of sediment-hosted massive sulfide deposits and granite-related hydrothermal Sn deposits in China. Tourmalines from the Yindongzi-Tongmugou (Devonian) and the Qingchengzi (Proterozoic) Pb-Zn deposits show δ11B values of −7.6 to −13.7‰, which are within the typical δ11B ranges of massive sulfide deposits worldwide. At Dachang Sn-polymetallic deposit, the hydrothermal fluids responsible for the formation of banded tourmalinites have remarkable different δ11B values (−1 to −5‰) from those of quartz-tourmaline veins near the granite contacts (∼ −10‰), which indicate their different origins. Together with other geological and geochemical evidence, the banded tourmalinites at Dachang are of submarine hydrothermal exhalative origin. Overall, the boron isotopic compositions of tourmaline from massive sulfide deposits are mainly controlled by source rock compositions, and non-marine evaporites may have played an important role in the massive sulfide ore formation in same cases. Other controlling factors include temperatures, water/rock ratios, and seawater entrainments.
Tourmalines from the granite-related Yidong Sn deposit display a gradual increase in δ11B value from within the granite (−13.9‰), to the contact (−12.7 to −11.9‰) and the country rocks (−11.4 to −11.3‰). It is suggested that these variations reflect the boron isotope fractionation during magmatic degassing and magmatic-hydrothermal ore-forming processes with 11B preferentially partitioned into hydrothermal solutions. The similar and limited δ11B variations (−19.5 to −13.9‰) in granitic tourmalines from the granite-related Sn deposits in South China suggest that these Sn-rich granites may have similar source rocks from the basement of metasedimentary rocks and volcanic rocks in this region.