J. Jansen, James M. Thompson, M. Dugan, P. Nolan, Michael Wiemann, R. Birhiray, P. Jean Henslee‐Downey, Luke P. Akard
{"title":"外周血祖细胞移植。","authors":"J. Jansen, James M. Thompson, M. Dugan, P. Nolan, Michael Wiemann, R. Birhiray, P. Jean Henslee‐Downey, Luke P. Akard","doi":"10.1046/J.1526-0968.2002.00392.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become increasingly popular over the last 15 years as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. In the early 1990s, PBPCs replaced bone marrow (BM) as the preferred source of autologous stem cells, and recently the same phenomenon is seen in the allogeneic setting. Under steady-state conditions, the concentration of PBPCs (as defined by CFU-GM and/or CD34+ cells) is very low, and techniques were developed to increase markedly this concentration. Such mobilization techniques include daily injections of filgrastim (G-CSF) or a combination of chemotherapy and growth factors. Leukapheresis procedures allow the collection of large numbers of circulating white blood cells (and PBPCs). One or two leukapheresis procedures are often sufficient to obtain the minimum number of CD34+ cells considered necessary for prompt and consistent engraftment (i.e., 2.5-5.0 x 10(6)/kg). As compared to BM, autologous transplants with PBPCs lead to faster hematologic recovery and have few, if any, disadvantages. In the allogeneic arena, PBPCs also result in faster engraftment, but at a somewhat higher cost of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This may be a double-edged sword leading to both increased graft-versus-tumor effects and increased morbidity. The rapid advances in the study of hematopoietic, and even earlier, stem cells will continue to shape the future of PBPC transplantation.","PeriodicalId":79755,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis","volume":"25 1","pages":"5-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"62","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peripheral blood progenitor cell transplantation.\",\"authors\":\"J. Jansen, James M. Thompson, M. Dugan, P. Nolan, Michael Wiemann, R. Birhiray, P. Jean Henslee‐Downey, Luke P. Akard\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1526-0968.2002.00392.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become increasingly popular over the last 15 years as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. In the early 1990s, PBPCs replaced bone marrow (BM) as the preferred source of autologous stem cells, and recently the same phenomenon is seen in the allogeneic setting. Under steady-state conditions, the concentration of PBPCs (as defined by CFU-GM and/or CD34+ cells) is very low, and techniques were developed to increase markedly this concentration. Such mobilization techniques include daily injections of filgrastim (G-CSF) or a combination of chemotherapy and growth factors. Leukapheresis procedures allow the collection of large numbers of circulating white blood cells (and PBPCs). One or two leukapheresis procedures are often sufficient to obtain the minimum number of CD34+ cells considered necessary for prompt and consistent engraftment (i.e., 2.5-5.0 x 10(6)/kg). As compared to BM, autologous transplants with PBPCs lead to faster hematologic recovery and have few, if any, disadvantages. In the allogeneic arena, PBPCs also result in faster engraftment, but at a somewhat higher cost of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This may be a double-edged sword leading to both increased graft-versus-tumor effects and increased morbidity. The rapid advances in the study of hematopoietic, and even earlier, stem cells will continue to shape the future of PBPC transplantation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":79755,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"5-14\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"62\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1526-0968.2002.00392.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic apheresis : official journal of the International Society for Apheresis and the Japanese Society for Apheresis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1526-0968.2002.00392.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62
摘要
在过去的15年中,外周血祖细胞(PBPCs)作为移植用造血干细胞的来源越来越受欢迎。在20世纪90年代早期,PBPCs取代骨髓(BM)成为自体干细胞的首选来源,最近在同种异体环境中也出现了同样的现象。在稳态条件下,pbpc(由CFU-GM和/或CD34+细胞定义)的浓度非常低,并且开发了显着增加该浓度的技术。这种动员技术包括每日注射非格拉西汀(G-CSF)或化疗和生长因子的组合。白细胞分离程序允许收集大量循环白细胞(和pbpc)。一次或两次白细胞分离术通常足以获得被认为是快速和一致移植所需的最小CD34+细胞数量(即2.5-5.0 x 10(6)/kg)。与骨髓移植相比,带有PBPCs的自体移植可以更快地恢复血液学,并且几乎没有缺点。在同种异体领域,pbpc也导致更快的移植,但慢性移植物抗宿主病(GvHD)的成本更高。这可能是一把双刃剑,既增加了移植物抗肿瘤效果,也增加了发病率。造血研究的快速发展,甚至更早,干细胞将继续塑造PBPC移植的未来。
Peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPCs) have become increasingly popular over the last 15 years as the source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation. In the early 1990s, PBPCs replaced bone marrow (BM) as the preferred source of autologous stem cells, and recently the same phenomenon is seen in the allogeneic setting. Under steady-state conditions, the concentration of PBPCs (as defined by CFU-GM and/or CD34+ cells) is very low, and techniques were developed to increase markedly this concentration. Such mobilization techniques include daily injections of filgrastim (G-CSF) or a combination of chemotherapy and growth factors. Leukapheresis procedures allow the collection of large numbers of circulating white blood cells (and PBPCs). One or two leukapheresis procedures are often sufficient to obtain the minimum number of CD34+ cells considered necessary for prompt and consistent engraftment (i.e., 2.5-5.0 x 10(6)/kg). As compared to BM, autologous transplants with PBPCs lead to faster hematologic recovery and have few, if any, disadvantages. In the allogeneic arena, PBPCs also result in faster engraftment, but at a somewhat higher cost of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GvHD). This may be a double-edged sword leading to both increased graft-versus-tumor effects and increased morbidity. The rapid advances in the study of hematopoietic, and even earlier, stem cells will continue to shape the future of PBPC transplantation.