评估金融市场的偏差

IF 1.4 3区 数学 Q2 STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
Giovanni Campisi, L. La Rocca, S. Muzzioli
{"title":"评估金融市场的偏差","authors":"Giovanni Campisi, L. La Rocca, S. Muzzioli","doi":"10.1111/stan.12273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a matter of common observation that investors value substantial gains but are averse to heavy losses. Obvious as it may sound, this translates into an interesting preference for right‐skewed return distributions, whose right tails are heavier than their left tails. Skewness is thus not only a way to describe the shape of a distribution, but also a tool for risk measurement. We review the statistical literature on skewness and provide a comprehensive framework for its assessment. Then, we present a new measure of skewness, based on the decomposition of variance in its upward and downward components. We argue that this measure fills a gap in the literature and show in a simulation study that it strikes a good balance between robustness and sensitivity.","PeriodicalId":51178,"journal":{"name":"Statistica Neerlandica","volume":"61 1","pages":"48 - 70"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing skewness in financial markets\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Campisi, L. La Rocca, S. Muzzioli\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/stan.12273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is a matter of common observation that investors value substantial gains but are averse to heavy losses. Obvious as it may sound, this translates into an interesting preference for right‐skewed return distributions, whose right tails are heavier than their left tails. Skewness is thus not only a way to describe the shape of a distribution, but also a tool for risk measurement. We review the statistical literature on skewness and provide a comprehensive framework for its assessment. Then, we present a new measure of skewness, based on the decomposition of variance in its upward and downward components. We argue that this measure fills a gap in the literature and show in a simulation study that it strikes a good balance between robustness and sensitivity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"48 - 70\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12273\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistica Neerlandica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12273","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

投资者看重可观的收益,但不愿遭受重大损失,这是一个普遍的观察结果。虽然听起来很明显,但这转化为对右倾斜的回报分布的有趣偏好,其右尾比左尾重。因此,偏度不仅是描述分布形状的一种方式,也是衡量风险的一种工具。我们回顾了关于偏度的统计文献,并为其评估提供了一个全面的框架。然后,我们提出了一种新的测量偏度,基于方差的分解在其上下分量。我们认为这一措施填补了文献中的空白,并在模拟研究中表明,它在鲁棒性和敏感性之间取得了很好的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing skewness in financial markets
It is a matter of common observation that investors value substantial gains but are averse to heavy losses. Obvious as it may sound, this translates into an interesting preference for right‐skewed return distributions, whose right tails are heavier than their left tails. Skewness is thus not only a way to describe the shape of a distribution, but also a tool for risk measurement. We review the statistical literature on skewness and provide a comprehensive framework for its assessment. Then, we present a new measure of skewness, based on the decomposition of variance in its upward and downward components. We argue that this measure fills a gap in the literature and show in a simulation study that it strikes a good balance between robustness and sensitivity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Statistica Neerlandica
Statistica Neerlandica 数学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Statistica Neerlandica has been the journal of the Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research since 1946. It covers all areas of statistics, from theoretical to applied, with a special emphasis on mathematical statistics, statistics for the behavioural sciences and biostatistics. This wide scope is reflected by the expertise of the journal’s editors representing these areas. The diverse editorial board is committed to a fast and fair reviewing process, and will judge submissions on quality, correctness, relevance and originality. Statistica Neerlandica encourages transparency and reproducibility, and offers online resources to make data, code, simulation results and other additional materials publicly available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信