第二代抗精神病药物作为辅助治疗方案在难治性强迫症中的疗效评价

S. Shafti, H. Kaviani
{"title":"第二代抗精神病药物作为辅助治疗方案在难治性强迫症中的疗效评价","authors":"S. Shafti, H. Kaviani","doi":"10.2174/2211556008666190314113446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nSince around half of the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder\ndo not respond efficiently to current serotonin- reuptake inhibitors, the objective of\nthe present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of quetiapine against aripiprazole\nin patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded successfully\nto fluvoxamine.\n\n\n\nForty-four patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded\nefficaciously to fluvoxamine, at maximum dose (300 milligrams per day) and duration\n(twelve weeks), were allocated randomly in a double-blind assessment to take quetiapine\n(n=22) or aripiprazole (n=22), plus their serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for twelve weeks.\nWhile treatment response was evaluated by the Yale- Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale\n(YBOCS), as the main outcome scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale (CGI-S)\nwas also used as an ancillary measure.\n\n\n\n54.54% of patients in the quetiapine group and 27.27% of them in the aripiprazole\ngroup responded partially to the abovementioned on treatment adds. According to the findings,\nthe YBOCS score dropped from 31.18+/-4.93 to 27.97+/-3.71 (p<0.01), and 33.27 +/- 3.90\nto 30.72+/-4.67 (p < 0.06), for quetiapine and aripiprazole, respectively. In this regard, no\nsubstantial alteration regarding CGI-S was evident in each of the aforementioned groups.\n\n\n\nThis assessment indicated that patients with treatment-resistant obsessivecompulsive\ndisorder could benefit more from adding quetiapine, in comparison with aripiprazole,\nto their current serotonergic medication.\n","PeriodicalId":10751,"journal":{"name":"Current Psychopharmacology","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Second Generation Antipsychotics, as Augmentative Plan, in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder\",\"authors\":\"S. Shafti, H. Kaviani\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/2211556008666190314113446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\nSince around half of the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder\\ndo not respond efficiently to current serotonin- reuptake inhibitors, the objective of\\nthe present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of quetiapine against aripiprazole\\nin patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded successfully\\nto fluvoxamine.\\n\\n\\n\\nForty-four patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded\\nefficaciously to fluvoxamine, at maximum dose (300 milligrams per day) and duration\\n(twelve weeks), were allocated randomly in a double-blind assessment to take quetiapine\\n(n=22) or aripiprazole (n=22), plus their serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for twelve weeks.\\nWhile treatment response was evaluated by the Yale- Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale\\n(YBOCS), as the main outcome scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale (CGI-S)\\nwas also used as an ancillary measure.\\n\\n\\n\\n54.54% of patients in the quetiapine group and 27.27% of them in the aripiprazole\\ngroup responded partially to the abovementioned on treatment adds. According to the findings,\\nthe YBOCS score dropped from 31.18+/-4.93 to 27.97+/-3.71 (p<0.01), and 33.27 +/- 3.90\\nto 30.72+/-4.67 (p < 0.06), for quetiapine and aripiprazole, respectively. In this regard, no\\nsubstantial alteration regarding CGI-S was evident in each of the aforementioned groups.\\n\\n\\n\\nThis assessment indicated that patients with treatment-resistant obsessivecompulsive\\ndisorder could benefit more from adding quetiapine, in comparison with aripiprazole,\\nto their current serotonergic medication.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":10751,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current Psychopharmacology\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current Psychopharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/2211556008666190314113446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/2211556008666190314113446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

由于大约一半的强迫症患者对目前的5 -羟色胺再摄取抑制剂没有有效的反应,本研究的目的是比较喹硫平对阿立哌唑类强迫症患者的有效性和安全性,这些患者对氟伏沙明没有成功的反应。44名对氟伏沙明无不良反应的强迫症患者,在最大剂量(每天300毫克)和持续时间(12周)下,被随机分配到双盲评估中,服用喹硫平(n=22)或阿立哌唑(n=22),加上他们的血清素再摄取抑制剂12周。在以耶鲁-布朗强迫症量表(YBOCS)作为主要结局量表评估治疗效果的同时,临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S)也作为辅助指标。喹硫平组54.54%的患者和阿立哌唑组27.27%的患者在治疗过程中对上述指标有部分反应。结果显示,喹硫平组YBOCS评分从31.18+/-4.93降至27.97+/-3.71 (p<0.01),阿立哌唑组从33.27 +/- 3.90降至30.72+/-4.67 (p< 0.06)。在这方面,上述各组的CGI-S没有明显的实质性变化。这一评估表明,与阿立哌唑相比,难治性强迫症患者在目前的血清素能药物中加入喹硫平可能会获益更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Second Generation Antipsychotics, as Augmentative Plan, in Treatment-Resistant Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Since around half of the patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder do not respond efficiently to current serotonin- reuptake inhibitors, the objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of quetiapine against aripiprazole in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded successfully to fluvoxamine. Forty-four patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder, who had not responded efficaciously to fluvoxamine, at maximum dose (300 milligrams per day) and duration (twelve weeks), were allocated randomly in a double-blind assessment to take quetiapine (n=22) or aripiprazole (n=22), plus their serotonin-reuptake inhibitor for twelve weeks. While treatment response was evaluated by the Yale- Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS), as the main outcome scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity Scale (CGI-S) was also used as an ancillary measure. 54.54% of patients in the quetiapine group and 27.27% of them in the aripiprazole group responded partially to the abovementioned on treatment adds. According to the findings, the YBOCS score dropped from 31.18+/-4.93 to 27.97+/-3.71 (p<0.01), and 33.27 +/- 3.90 to 30.72+/-4.67 (p < 0.06), for quetiapine and aripiprazole, respectively. In this regard, no substantial alteration regarding CGI-S was evident in each of the aforementioned groups. This assessment indicated that patients with treatment-resistant obsessivecompulsive disorder could benefit more from adding quetiapine, in comparison with aripiprazole, to their current serotonergic medication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信