[钝针与锋利缝合针预防手术人员经皮暴露事件的比较]。

Annika Saarto, Jos H Verbeek, Marie-Claude Lavoie, M. Pahwa
{"title":"[钝针与锋利缝合针预防手术人员经皮暴露事件的比较]。","authors":"Annika Saarto, Jos H Verbeek, Marie-Claude Lavoie, M. Pahwa","doi":"10.1002/14651858.cd009170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"assessed study eligibility and risk of bias in trials and extracted data. synthesized study results with a fixed-effect model meta-analysis.","PeriodicalId":101300,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","volume":"8 1","pages":"142-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff].\",\"authors\":\"Annika Saarto, Jos H Verbeek, Marie-Claude Lavoie, M. Pahwa\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/14651858.cd009170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"assessed study eligibility and risk of bias in trials and extracted data. synthesized study results with a fixed-effect model meta-analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"142-3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd009170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

评估试验的研究资格和偏倚风险,并提取数据。采用固定效应模型进行meta分析的综合研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Blunt versus sharp suture needles for preventing percutaneous exposure incidents in surgical staff].
assessed study eligibility and risk of bias in trials and extracted data. synthesized study results with a fixed-effect model meta-analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信