原住民族建构:奥奈达族司法制度的长期形成

Larry Nesper
{"title":"原住民族建构:奥奈达族司法制度的长期形成","authors":"Larry Nesper","doi":"10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.1.0087","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article documents the emergence of the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin’s judiciary over the course of the past thirty years. It argues that judicial systems have become necessary tribal institutions in the federal Indian policy era of self-determination, but assimilating them to tribal societies that are characteristically organized by kinship presents serious challenges of legitimacy. The Oneida Nation needed a formal dispute resolution forum in order to qualify for certain federal programs under the policy regime. It created the Appeals Commission, which aspired to be a tribal court and separate branch of government integrating fundamental Oneida values and practices. As the commission expanded the scope of its jurisdiction and became more engaged with other tribal courts in the state, sectors within the Oneida community contested its legitimacy. Because of developments in the relationship between the state courts and tribal courts in Wisconsin, the commission began to take cases dealing with marriage, divorce, and children in the last several years. The contradictions between the community as society organized by kinship and a community organized as a tribal state precipitated a crisis that eventuated in the creation of a new institution.","PeriodicalId":22216,"journal":{"name":"The American Indian Quarterly","volume":"16 1","pages":"116 - 87"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Native Nation Building: The Long Emergence of the Oneida Nation Judiciary\",\"authors\":\"Larry Nesper\",\"doi\":\"10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.1.0087\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article documents the emergence of the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin’s judiciary over the course of the past thirty years. It argues that judicial systems have become necessary tribal institutions in the federal Indian policy era of self-determination, but assimilating them to tribal societies that are characteristically organized by kinship presents serious challenges of legitimacy. The Oneida Nation needed a formal dispute resolution forum in order to qualify for certain federal programs under the policy regime. It created the Appeals Commission, which aspired to be a tribal court and separate branch of government integrating fundamental Oneida values and practices. As the commission expanded the scope of its jurisdiction and became more engaged with other tribal courts in the state, sectors within the Oneida community contested its legitimacy. Because of developments in the relationship between the state courts and tribal courts in Wisconsin, the commission began to take cases dealing with marriage, divorce, and children in the last several years. The contradictions between the community as society organized by kinship and a community organized as a tribal state precipitated a crisis that eventuated in the creation of a new institution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Indian Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"116 - 87\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Indian Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.1.0087\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Indian Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5250/AMERINDIQUAR.42.1.0087","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文记录了威斯康星州奥奈达民族在过去三十年中司法机构的出现。它认为,在联邦印第安人的自决政策时代,司法系统已经成为必要的部落机构,但将它们同化到以亲属关系为特征的部落社会中,对合法性提出了严重的挑战。奥奈达族需要一个正式的争端解决论坛,以便有资格参加该政策制度下的某些联邦项目。它设立了上诉委员会,希望成为一个部落法院和独立的政府部门,整合奥奈达的基本价值观和做法。随着该委员会扩大其管辖范围,并与该州其他部落法院进行更多接触,奥奈达社区的一些部门对其合法性提出了质疑。由于威斯康星州州法院和部落法院之间关系的发展,该委员会在过去几年中开始受理涉及婚姻、离婚和儿童的案件。以亲属关系为组织形式的共同体与以部落国家为组织形式的共同体之间的矛盾,引发了一场危机,最终导致了新制度的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Native Nation Building: The Long Emergence of the Oneida Nation Judiciary
Abstract:This article documents the emergence of the Oneida Nation of Wisconsin’s judiciary over the course of the past thirty years. It argues that judicial systems have become necessary tribal institutions in the federal Indian policy era of self-determination, but assimilating them to tribal societies that are characteristically organized by kinship presents serious challenges of legitimacy. The Oneida Nation needed a formal dispute resolution forum in order to qualify for certain federal programs under the policy regime. It created the Appeals Commission, which aspired to be a tribal court and separate branch of government integrating fundamental Oneida values and practices. As the commission expanded the scope of its jurisdiction and became more engaged with other tribal courts in the state, sectors within the Oneida community contested its legitimacy. Because of developments in the relationship between the state courts and tribal courts in Wisconsin, the commission began to take cases dealing with marriage, divorce, and children in the last several years. The contradictions between the community as society organized by kinship and a community organized as a tribal state precipitated a crisis that eventuated in the creation of a new institution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信