对于最近的莫斯科轨道青铜阶段的定义:时间和/或“文化”的区别?

G. Pignocchi
{"title":"对于最近的莫斯科轨道青铜阶段的定义:时间和/或“文化”的区别?","authors":"G. Pignocchi","doi":"10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/11005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focusses on a particular aspect that emerges in the advanced phase of the Recent Bronze Age, namely the sometimes sudden and remarkable appearance of Terramare elements in pottery finds at some sites outside the Terramare area. Although in apparent continuity with the previous period, these finds point to a significant change in pottery production (in terms of type and decorative motives), suggesting changes in the socio-economic order and perhaps in the “ethnic” make-up of some communities. \nThis is particularly evident in a number of settlements, some geographically distant from each another, namely in the Veneto, Tuscany, Romagna, the Marche, Campania, Puglia and Calabria, as already mentioned by Andrea Cardarelli in particular and other authors. These sites share a number of features regarding production materials, but we do not know whether this is an indication of the same cultural and/or ethnic identity. \nThe main aim of this article is to analyse the development process of the Recent Bronze Age in Italy, obtaining a more precise definition of the period’s latter part, which marks the direct transition to the Final Bronze Age in the mid-12th century BC. This case study makes part of a wider debate on how to describe this similarity in material culture. We discuss how the relation with “typical” identities (material and ideological) of entities in specific geographical areas during the process of historical evolution between the Recent Bronze Age (RBA) and Final Bronze Age (FBA) can be described as “phase” or “chronological horizon” rather than in terms like culture or facies. \nMoscosi di Cingoli, subjected to systematic surveys but only partly published, is an emblematic site in understanding this period. Within the detailed stratigraphic sequence stretching from the Middle Bronze Age 3 (MB3) and continuing through the Recent Bronze Age (RBA), new elements appear at Moscosi that relate to the last occupation of this site. A number of significant elements found here suggest that this period may be a sub-stage of the RBA2, to be divided into RBA2a and RBA2b, or a new stage BR3, on the basis of a more detailed stratigraphic analysis of the materials. \nAlready during the excavation at Moscosi and during the preliminary analysis of the materials, it was particularly evident that new types and new syntaxes were coming to light in the upper stratigraphic units, with innovative elements appearing in the stratigraphic sequence of the RBA2. These seem to be useful indicators of the final stage of the Recent Bronze Age, transitioning into the Final Bronze Age (in particular the Miradolo variety B dagger, the raised twisted handles, the carinated cups with shallow bellies and shoulders decorated with oblique or vertical grooves, the bowls with inward sloping rims decorated with horizontal grooves, and the bowl with an oblique lip decorated with zig-zag grooves).","PeriodicalId":30393,"journal":{"name":"IpoTESI di Preistoria","volume":"25 1","pages":"21-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Per una definizione della fase finale del Bronzo Recente di Moscosi di Cingoli: distinzione cronologica e/o “culturale”?\",\"authors\":\"G. Pignocchi\",\"doi\":\"10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/11005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focusses on a particular aspect that emerges in the advanced phase of the Recent Bronze Age, namely the sometimes sudden and remarkable appearance of Terramare elements in pottery finds at some sites outside the Terramare area. Although in apparent continuity with the previous period, these finds point to a significant change in pottery production (in terms of type and decorative motives), suggesting changes in the socio-economic order and perhaps in the “ethnic” make-up of some communities. \\nThis is particularly evident in a number of settlements, some geographically distant from each another, namely in the Veneto, Tuscany, Romagna, the Marche, Campania, Puglia and Calabria, as already mentioned by Andrea Cardarelli in particular and other authors. These sites share a number of features regarding production materials, but we do not know whether this is an indication of the same cultural and/or ethnic identity. \\nThe main aim of this article is to analyse the development process of the Recent Bronze Age in Italy, obtaining a more precise definition of the period’s latter part, which marks the direct transition to the Final Bronze Age in the mid-12th century BC. This case study makes part of a wider debate on how to describe this similarity in material culture. We discuss how the relation with “typical” identities (material and ideological) of entities in specific geographical areas during the process of historical evolution between the Recent Bronze Age (RBA) and Final Bronze Age (FBA) can be described as “phase” or “chronological horizon” rather than in terms like culture or facies. \\nMoscosi di Cingoli, subjected to systematic surveys but only partly published, is an emblematic site in understanding this period. Within the detailed stratigraphic sequence stretching from the Middle Bronze Age 3 (MB3) and continuing through the Recent Bronze Age (RBA), new elements appear at Moscosi that relate to the last occupation of this site. A number of significant elements found here suggest that this period may be a sub-stage of the RBA2, to be divided into RBA2a and RBA2b, or a new stage BR3, on the basis of a more detailed stratigraphic analysis of the materials. \\nAlready during the excavation at Moscosi and during the preliminary analysis of the materials, it was particularly evident that new types and new syntaxes were coming to light in the upper stratigraphic units, with innovative elements appearing in the stratigraphic sequence of the RBA2. These seem to be useful indicators of the final stage of the Recent Bronze Age, transitioning into the Final Bronze Age (in particular the Miradolo variety B dagger, the raised twisted handles, the carinated cups with shallow bellies and shoulders decorated with oblique or vertical grooves, the bowls with inward sloping rims decorated with horizontal grooves, and the bowl with an oblique lip decorated with zig-zag grooves).\",\"PeriodicalId\":30393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IpoTESI di Preistoria\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"21-30\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IpoTESI di Preistoria\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/11005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IpoTESI di Preistoria","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6092/ISSN.1974-7985/11005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的重点是在近代青铜器时代晚期出现的一个特殊方面,即在陶俑地区以外的一些地点发现的陶器中,有时突然而显著地出现陶俑元素。尽管这些发现与前一时期明显保持连续性,但这些发现表明陶器生产(在类型和装饰动机方面)发生了重大变化,表明社会经济秩序发生了变化,也许在某些社区的“种族”构成方面也发生了变化。这在一些地理上彼此相距遥远的定居点中尤为明显,即威尼托、托斯卡纳、罗马涅、马尔凯、坎帕尼亚、普利亚和卡拉布里亚,正如安德里亚·卡达雷利和其他作者特别提到的那样。这些遗址在生产材料方面有许多共同的特点,但我们不知道这是否表明了相同的文化和/或种族身份。本文的主要目的是分析意大利最近青铜器时代的发展过程,对这一时期的后期进行更精确的定义,这标志着公元前12世纪中期直接过渡到最后的青铜器时代。这个案例研究是关于如何描述物质文化中的这种相似性的更广泛辩论的一部分。我们讨论了在近代青铜器时代(RBA)和末期青铜器时代(FBA)之间的历史演变过程中,特定地理区域的实体与“典型”身份(物质和意识形态)的关系如何被描述为“阶段”或“时间视界”,而不是文化或相。经过系统调查,但仅部分发表的莫斯科迪钦戈利遗址是了解这一时期的标志性遗址。在详细的地层序列中,从中青铜器时代3 (MB3)一直延伸到最近的青铜器时代(RBA),在莫斯科出现了与该遗址最后一次占领有关的新元素。在此发现的重要元素表明,通过对材料进行更详细的地层分析,该时期可能是RBA2的一个亚阶段,可划分为RBA2a和RBA2b,或者是一个新的BR3阶段。在莫斯科西的挖掘和对材料的初步分析期间,特别明显的是,在上部地层单元中出现了新的类型和新的句法,在RBA2的地层序列中出现了创新的元素。这些似乎是最近青铜时代过渡到最后青铜时代的最后阶段的有用指标(特别是米拉多洛品种B匕首,凸起的扭曲手柄,浅腹部和肩部装饰有倾斜或垂直凹槽的镂空杯子,向内倾斜的边缘装饰有水平凹槽的碗,倾斜的碗唇装饰有锯齿状凹槽)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Per una definizione della fase finale del Bronzo Recente di Moscosi di Cingoli: distinzione cronologica e/o “culturale”?
This paper focusses on a particular aspect that emerges in the advanced phase of the Recent Bronze Age, namely the sometimes sudden and remarkable appearance of Terramare elements in pottery finds at some sites outside the Terramare area. Although in apparent continuity with the previous period, these finds point to a significant change in pottery production (in terms of type and decorative motives), suggesting changes in the socio-economic order and perhaps in the “ethnic” make-up of some communities. This is particularly evident in a number of settlements, some geographically distant from each another, namely in the Veneto, Tuscany, Romagna, the Marche, Campania, Puglia and Calabria, as already mentioned by Andrea Cardarelli in particular and other authors. These sites share a number of features regarding production materials, but we do not know whether this is an indication of the same cultural and/or ethnic identity. The main aim of this article is to analyse the development process of the Recent Bronze Age in Italy, obtaining a more precise definition of the period’s latter part, which marks the direct transition to the Final Bronze Age in the mid-12th century BC. This case study makes part of a wider debate on how to describe this similarity in material culture. We discuss how the relation with “typical” identities (material and ideological) of entities in specific geographical areas during the process of historical evolution between the Recent Bronze Age (RBA) and Final Bronze Age (FBA) can be described as “phase” or “chronological horizon” rather than in terms like culture or facies. Moscosi di Cingoli, subjected to systematic surveys but only partly published, is an emblematic site in understanding this period. Within the detailed stratigraphic sequence stretching from the Middle Bronze Age 3 (MB3) and continuing through the Recent Bronze Age (RBA), new elements appear at Moscosi that relate to the last occupation of this site. A number of significant elements found here suggest that this period may be a sub-stage of the RBA2, to be divided into RBA2a and RBA2b, or a new stage BR3, on the basis of a more detailed stratigraphic analysis of the materials. Already during the excavation at Moscosi and during the preliminary analysis of the materials, it was particularly evident that new types and new syntaxes were coming to light in the upper stratigraphic units, with innovative elements appearing in the stratigraphic sequence of the RBA2. These seem to be useful indicators of the final stage of the Recent Bronze Age, transitioning into the Final Bronze Age (in particular the Miradolo variety B dagger, the raised twisted handles, the carinated cups with shallow bellies and shoulders decorated with oblique or vertical grooves, the bowls with inward sloping rims decorated with horizontal grooves, and the bowl with an oblique lip decorated with zig-zag grooves).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信