骨髓型颈椎病患者自体骨移植与PEEK Cage的比较

Ijaz Hussain Wadd, Ammar Anwer, Liaqat Mehmood Awan, Arsalan Haider, Asif Shabbir, Zayed Qamar
{"title":"骨髓型颈椎病患者自体骨移植与PEEK Cage的比较","authors":"Ijaz Hussain Wadd, Ammar Anwer, Liaqat Mehmood Awan, Arsalan Haider, Asif Shabbir, Zayed Qamar","doi":"10.36552/pjns.v26i3.786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:  Cervical spine stenosis is one of the most common degenerative changes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and results in severe dysfunction of the cervical spinal cord. The conventional treatment of such degenerative cervical spine conditions is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Strut graft remains the gold standard in ACDF with excellent patient recovery but has many shortcomings. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have recently become popular as a replacement for strut grafts in patients undergoing ACDF. \nObjective:  This study was carried out to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of autologous bone grafts versus PEEK cages in patients undergoing ACDF surgery. \nMaterials and Methods:  It was a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Neurosurgery Department Punjab Institute of Neurosciences for three years. Patients who consented to be a part of this study and fulfilled our predefined inclusion criteria were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. One group underwent ACDF with auto bone graft whereas the other group underwent ACDF with PEEK cage. \nResults:  A total of 198 subjects were included in this study. The mean age was calculated as 47.60 ± 9.17 years in the PEEK cage group and 46.74 ± 8.87 years in the Autologous bone graft group. Males accounted for 59.6% of the study population.  The fusion rate was found to be higher in the PEEK cage group with a p-value of 0.002. \nConclusion:  PEEK cages are superior to strut grafts as they have lesser morbidity after ACDF surgery in patients with CSM. \n ","PeriodicalId":19963,"journal":{"name":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","volume":"6 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Autologous Bone Graft vs PEEK Cage in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy\",\"authors\":\"Ijaz Hussain Wadd, Ammar Anwer, Liaqat Mehmood Awan, Arsalan Haider, Asif Shabbir, Zayed Qamar\",\"doi\":\"10.36552/pjns.v26i3.786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:  Cervical spine stenosis is one of the most common degenerative changes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and results in severe dysfunction of the cervical spinal cord. The conventional treatment of such degenerative cervical spine conditions is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Strut graft remains the gold standard in ACDF with excellent patient recovery but has many shortcomings. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have recently become popular as a replacement for strut grafts in patients undergoing ACDF. \\nObjective:  This study was carried out to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of autologous bone grafts versus PEEK cages in patients undergoing ACDF surgery. \\nMaterials and Methods:  It was a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Neurosurgery Department Punjab Institute of Neurosciences for three years. Patients who consented to be a part of this study and fulfilled our predefined inclusion criteria were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. One group underwent ACDF with auto bone graft whereas the other group underwent ACDF with PEEK cage. \\nResults:  A total of 198 subjects were included in this study. The mean age was calculated as 47.60 ± 9.17 years in the PEEK cage group and 46.74 ± 8.87 years in the Autologous bone graft group. Males accounted for 59.6% of the study population.  The fusion rate was found to be higher in the PEEK cage group with a p-value of 0.002. \\nConclusion:  PEEK cages are superior to strut grafts as they have lesser morbidity after ACDF surgery in patients with CSM. \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":19963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i3.786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pakistan Journal Of Neurological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36552/pjns.v26i3.786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:颈椎狭窄是脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)最常见的退行性改变之一,可导致严重的颈脊髓功能障碍。这种退行性颈椎疾病的常规治疗是颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合(ACDF)。支架移植仍然是ACDF的金标准,患者恢复良好,但也有许多缺点。聚醚醚酮(PEEK)笼最近成为ACDF患者支架移植的替代品。目的:本研究比较ACDF手术患者自体骨移植物与PEEK笼的临床和影像学结果。材料与方法:在旁遮普神经科学研究所神经外科进行了为期三年的随机对照试验。同意参加本研究并符合我们预先确定的纳入标准的患者被招募并随机分为两组。一组采用ACDF +自体骨移植,另一组采用ACDF + PEEK笼。结果:本研究共纳入198名受试者。PEEK笼组的平均年龄为47.60±9.17岁,自体骨移植组的平均年龄为46.74±8.87岁。男性占研究人群的59.6%。PEEK笼组融合率较高,p值为0.002。结论:CSM患者行ACDF手术后,PEEK cage的发病率较strut graft低,优于strut graft。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Autologous Bone Graft vs PEEK Cage in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Background:  Cervical spine stenosis is one of the most common degenerative changes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) and results in severe dysfunction of the cervical spinal cord. The conventional treatment of such degenerative cervical spine conditions is anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Strut graft remains the gold standard in ACDF with excellent patient recovery but has many shortcomings. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages have recently become popular as a replacement for strut grafts in patients undergoing ACDF. Objective:  This study was carried out to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of autologous bone grafts versus PEEK cages in patients undergoing ACDF surgery. Materials and Methods:  It was a randomized controlled trial conducted at the Neurosurgery Department Punjab Institute of Neurosciences for three years. Patients who consented to be a part of this study and fulfilled our predefined inclusion criteria were recruited and randomized into 2 groups. One group underwent ACDF with auto bone graft whereas the other group underwent ACDF with PEEK cage. Results:  A total of 198 subjects were included in this study. The mean age was calculated as 47.60 ± 9.17 years in the PEEK cage group and 46.74 ± 8.87 years in the Autologous bone graft group. Males accounted for 59.6% of the study population.  The fusion rate was found to be higher in the PEEK cage group with a p-value of 0.002. Conclusion:  PEEK cages are superior to strut grafts as they have lesser morbidity after ACDF surgery in patients with CSM.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信