玉米生产中一些农业技术因素的经济分析——以匈牙利为例

Attila Bai, Zoltán Gabnai, I. Kovách, Ibolya Czibere, J. Nagy, D. Sulyok, Donika Maloku, P. Balogh
{"title":"玉米生产中一些农业技术因素的经济分析——以匈牙利为例","authors":"Attila Bai, Zoltán Gabnai, I. Kovách, Ibolya Czibere, J. Nagy, D. Sulyok, Donika Maloku, P. Balogh","doi":"10.19041/apstract/2019/3-4/1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper focuses on the economic and statistical evaluation of the production technology findings of the polyfactorial maize production experiments carried out between 2015-2017 at the Latokep Experiment Site of the University of Debrecen, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management. The examined agrotechnical factors included irrigation, previous crop, tillage, crop density, hybrid and N nutrient supply, while the effect of different crop years was taken into consideration. In addition to descriptive statistical methods, we used multivariate regression analysis during the statistical evaluation. In the course of the evaluation, we examined three models that differed in terms of tillage methods and the consideration of crop year. In our best fit model, the factors were 71% responsible for the change in yield value. We carried out efficiency and comparative analyses in the course of the economic evaluation.Averaged over the three examined years, it can be stated that nutrient supply and crop year had an outstanding effect on yield, while irrigation had a minimal effect. However, global warming may justify irrigation in the future, not only from a biological point of view, but also from an economic aspect.Ideal tillage is also greatly affected by crop year, too. Altogether, of the examined tillage systems, subsoiling proved to be the best from an economic point of view.Our investigations confirm that it is better to perform intensive farming under more favourable market conditions. The optimum of N fertilisation is probably outside of the range we examined, if the extreme changes in maize and fertiliser prices are ignored. \nJEL Classification: Q16, Q12, Q13, O32","PeriodicalId":32569,"journal":{"name":"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic analysis of some agrotechnical factors in maize production - a Hungarian case study\",\"authors\":\"Attila Bai, Zoltán Gabnai, I. Kovách, Ibolya Czibere, J. Nagy, D. Sulyok, Donika Maloku, P. Balogh\",\"doi\":\"10.19041/apstract/2019/3-4/1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper focuses on the economic and statistical evaluation of the production technology findings of the polyfactorial maize production experiments carried out between 2015-2017 at the Latokep Experiment Site of the University of Debrecen, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management. The examined agrotechnical factors included irrigation, previous crop, tillage, crop density, hybrid and N nutrient supply, while the effect of different crop years was taken into consideration. In addition to descriptive statistical methods, we used multivariate regression analysis during the statistical evaluation. In the course of the evaluation, we examined three models that differed in terms of tillage methods and the consideration of crop year. In our best fit model, the factors were 71% responsible for the change in yield value. We carried out efficiency and comparative analyses in the course of the economic evaluation.Averaged over the three examined years, it can be stated that nutrient supply and crop year had an outstanding effect on yield, while irrigation had a minimal effect. However, global warming may justify irrigation in the future, not only from a biological point of view, but also from an economic aspect.Ideal tillage is also greatly affected by crop year, too. Altogether, of the examined tillage systems, subsoiling proved to be the best from an economic point of view.Our investigations confirm that it is better to perform intensive farming under more favourable market conditions. The optimum of N fertilisation is probably outside of the range we examined, if the extreme changes in maize and fertiliser prices are ignored. \\nJEL Classification: Q16, Q12, Q13, O32\",\"PeriodicalId\":32569,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2019/3-4/1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Apstract Applied Studies in Agribusiness and Commerce","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19041/apstract/2019/3-4/1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文重点对2015-2017年在德国德布勒森大学农业与食品科学与环境管理学院Latokep试验场进行的多因子玉米生产试验的生产技术成果进行了经济和统计评价。考察的农业技术因素包括灌溉、前茬、耕作、作物密度、杂交品种和氮素供应,同时考虑了不同作物年数的影响。在统计评价中,除了描述性统计方法外,我们还使用了多元回归分析。在评价过程中,我们考察了三种耕作方式和作物年考虑不同的模型。在我们的最佳拟合模型中,这些因素对产量值的变化负责71%。在经济评价过程中进行了效率分析和比较分析。从所研究的三个年份的平均值来看,可以认为养分供应和作物年份对产量有显著影响,而灌溉对产量的影响很小。然而,全球变暖可能在未来证明灌溉是合理的,不仅从生物学的角度来看,而且从经济的角度来看。理想耕作方式也受作物年份的影响较大。总的来说,从经济的角度来看,在研究的耕作制度中,深埋被证明是最好的。我们的调查证实,在更有利的市场条件下进行集约化耕作是更好的。如果忽略玉米和化肥价格的极端变化,施氮的最佳值可能超出了我们研究的范围。JEL分类:Q16, Q12, Q13, O32
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Economic analysis of some agrotechnical factors in maize production - a Hungarian case study
This paper focuses on the economic and statistical evaluation of the production technology findings of the polyfactorial maize production experiments carried out between 2015-2017 at the Latokep Experiment Site of the University of Debrecen, Faculty of Agricultural and Food Sciences and Environmental Management. The examined agrotechnical factors included irrigation, previous crop, tillage, crop density, hybrid and N nutrient supply, while the effect of different crop years was taken into consideration. In addition to descriptive statistical methods, we used multivariate regression analysis during the statistical evaluation. In the course of the evaluation, we examined three models that differed in terms of tillage methods and the consideration of crop year. In our best fit model, the factors were 71% responsible for the change in yield value. We carried out efficiency and comparative analyses in the course of the economic evaluation.Averaged over the three examined years, it can be stated that nutrient supply and crop year had an outstanding effect on yield, while irrigation had a minimal effect. However, global warming may justify irrigation in the future, not only from a biological point of view, but also from an economic aspect.Ideal tillage is also greatly affected by crop year, too. Altogether, of the examined tillage systems, subsoiling proved to be the best from an economic point of view.Our investigations confirm that it is better to perform intensive farming under more favourable market conditions. The optimum of N fertilisation is probably outside of the range we examined, if the extreme changes in maize and fertiliser prices are ignored. JEL Classification: Q16, Q12, Q13, O32
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信