“穿越痛苦之门”:寻求庇护者和公约难民在新西兰奥特罗阿的经历

IF 1.4 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
A. Bloom, Martine Udahemuka
{"title":"“穿越痛苦之门”:寻求庇护者和公约难民在新西兰奥特罗阿的经历","authors":"A. Bloom, Martine Udahemuka","doi":"10.1080/1177083X.2014.939664","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A qualitative study by ChangeMakers Refugee Forum and the National Refugee Network of the experiences of 18 Convention refugees has highlighted that the standards of safety and protection that Aotearoa New Zealand is obliged to extend to Convention refugees are inadequately met; most notably that there is a significant disparity between United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees quota refugees and Convention refugees, despite there being no distinction between the two within the 1951 Refugee Convention. Themes relating to participants' experiences of destitution, discrimination, and the deterioration of their physical and mental health during the process of seeking asylum and protection emerged from the study. Lack of resources, information and insufficient policies amounts to a lack of security and protection for Convention refugees in Aotearoa New Zealand, revealing an environment where funding, collaboration, and political and public goodwill are minimal.","PeriodicalId":39455,"journal":{"name":"Kotuitui","volume":"71 1","pages":"70 - 81"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘Going through the doors of pain’: asylum seeker and Convention refugee experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"A. Bloom, Martine Udahemuka\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/1177083X.2014.939664\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A qualitative study by ChangeMakers Refugee Forum and the National Refugee Network of the experiences of 18 Convention refugees has highlighted that the standards of safety and protection that Aotearoa New Zealand is obliged to extend to Convention refugees are inadequately met; most notably that there is a significant disparity between United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees quota refugees and Convention refugees, despite there being no distinction between the two within the 1951 Refugee Convention. Themes relating to participants' experiences of destitution, discrimination, and the deterioration of their physical and mental health during the process of seeking asylum and protection emerged from the study. Lack of resources, information and insufficient policies amounts to a lack of security and protection for Convention refugees in Aotearoa New Zealand, revealing an environment where funding, collaboration, and political and public goodwill are minimal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39455,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kotuitui\",\"volume\":\"71 1\",\"pages\":\"70 - 81\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kotuitui\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2014.939664\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kotuitui","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/1177083X.2014.939664","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

变革者难民论坛和全国难民网络对18名《公约》难民的经验进行的定性研究突出表明,新西兰有义务向《公约》难民提供的安全和保护标准没有得到充分满足;最值得注意的是,联合国难民事务高级专员名额难民和《公约》难民之间有很大的差别,尽管1951年《难民公约》对这两者没有区别。与参与者在寻求庇护和保护过程中经历的贫困、歧视和身心健康恶化有关的主题出现在研究中。缺乏资源、信息和政策不足导致新西兰奥特罗阿公约难民缺乏安全和保护,暴露了一个资金、合作、政治和公众善意微乎其微的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
‘Going through the doors of pain’: asylum seeker and Convention refugee experiences in Aotearoa New Zealand
A qualitative study by ChangeMakers Refugee Forum and the National Refugee Network of the experiences of 18 Convention refugees has highlighted that the standards of safety and protection that Aotearoa New Zealand is obliged to extend to Convention refugees are inadequately met; most notably that there is a significant disparity between United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees quota refugees and Convention refugees, despite there being no distinction between the two within the 1951 Refugee Convention. Themes relating to participants' experiences of destitution, discrimination, and the deterioration of their physical and mental health during the process of seeking asylum and protection emerged from the study. Lack of resources, information and insufficient policies amounts to a lack of security and protection for Convention refugees in Aotearoa New Zealand, revealing an environment where funding, collaboration, and political and public goodwill are minimal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kotuitui
Kotuitui Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Kotuitui: New Zealand Journal of Social Sciences Online is an international, open-access research journal published for social scientists in tertiary and research institutions and other organisations worldwide. The Maori name Kotuitui means interweaving and reflects the interdisciplinary nature of the journal. This open access, peer-reviewed journal encourages top-flight social science inquiry and research across all social science disciplines. It also recognises contributions made by the social science research community to other disciplines, including biological and physical sciences, and promotes connections between all research communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信