2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,景观设计师对绿色开放空间边界元素的偏好

D. K. Santoso, I. Setyabudi
{"title":"2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,景观设计师对绿色开放空间边界元素的偏好","authors":"D. K. Santoso, I. Setyabudi","doi":"10.30822/arteks.v6i2.691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Green open space has many benefits for humans. Unfortunately, the function of green open space cannot be fully felt due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Even though the application of physical distancing in the garden can be created through the use of garden border elements. As a first step in determining good and effective elements, this study aims to explore the preferences of garden designers in selecting garden border elements, their shapes, and arrangements to maintain the distance between garden users. This research is a perceptual research using a survey method obtained through distributing questionnaires and processed by quantitative descriptive and chi-square test. As for the results obtained in this study, garden designers agree that the border element is an effective way that can be used to implement physical distancing in public parks. Although, in general, garden designers prefer hardscape over softscapes as a border element, there are different preferences for the type of hardscape and softscape used. Garden designers prefer fences, portable benches> 2m apart and concrete construction as a hardscape barrier that can be applied to gardens that have been built. Meanwhile, the selection of softscape in the garden that has been built tends to use flowering shrubs as a border element. The conclusion of this study is the preference for material selection that is different in terms of functionality and aesthetics is caused by the pandemic","PeriodicalId":33750,"journal":{"name":"ARTEKS Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A landscape architect preferences on border elements at green open spaces during Covid-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"D. K. Santoso, I. Setyabudi\",\"doi\":\"10.30822/arteks.v6i2.691\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Green open space has many benefits for humans. Unfortunately, the function of green open space cannot be fully felt due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Even though the application of physical distancing in the garden can be created through the use of garden border elements. As a first step in determining good and effective elements, this study aims to explore the preferences of garden designers in selecting garden border elements, their shapes, and arrangements to maintain the distance between garden users. This research is a perceptual research using a survey method obtained through distributing questionnaires and processed by quantitative descriptive and chi-square test. As for the results obtained in this study, garden designers agree that the border element is an effective way that can be used to implement physical distancing in public parks. Although, in general, garden designers prefer hardscape over softscapes as a border element, there are different preferences for the type of hardscape and softscape used. Garden designers prefer fences, portable benches> 2m apart and concrete construction as a hardscape barrier that can be applied to gardens that have been built. Meanwhile, the selection of softscape in the garden that has been built tends to use flowering shrubs as a border element. The conclusion of this study is the preference for material selection that is different in terms of functionality and aesthetics is caused by the pandemic\",\"PeriodicalId\":33750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARTEKS Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARTEKS Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.691\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARTEKS Jurnal Teknik Arsitektur","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30822/arteks.v6i2.691","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

绿色开放空间对人类有很多好处。不幸的是,由于新冠肺炎疫情,绿色开放空间的功能无法充分发挥。尽管在花园中物理距离的应用可以通过使用花园边界元素来创造。作为确定好元素和有效元素的第一步,本研究旨在探讨园林设计师在选择园林边界元素时的偏好,它们的形状和排列,以保持园林使用者之间的距离。本研究是一项感性研究,采用的是通过发放问卷获得的调查方法,并采用定量描述和卡方检验进行处理。对于本研究的结果,园林设计师一致认为边界元素是一种有效的方式,可以用来在公园中实现物理距离。虽然,一般来说,园林设计师更喜欢硬景观而不是软景观作为边界元素,但对于使用的硬景观和软景观类型有不同的偏好。花园设计师更喜欢篱笆、间距> 2米的便携式长凳和混凝土结构作为硬景观屏障,可以应用于已经建成的花园。同时,在已建成的园林中,软景观的选择倾向于使用开花灌木作为边界元素。本研究的结论是,在功能和美学方面不同的材料选择偏好是由流行病引起的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A landscape architect preferences on border elements at green open spaces during Covid-19 pandemic
Green open space has many benefits for humans. Unfortunately, the function of green open space cannot be fully felt due to the Covid-19 pandemic. Even though the application of physical distancing in the garden can be created through the use of garden border elements. As a first step in determining good and effective elements, this study aims to explore the preferences of garden designers in selecting garden border elements, their shapes, and arrangements to maintain the distance between garden users. This research is a perceptual research using a survey method obtained through distributing questionnaires and processed by quantitative descriptive and chi-square test. As for the results obtained in this study, garden designers agree that the border element is an effective way that can be used to implement physical distancing in public parks. Although, in general, garden designers prefer hardscape over softscapes as a border element, there are different preferences for the type of hardscape and softscape used. Garden designers prefer fences, portable benches> 2m apart and concrete construction as a hardscape barrier that can be applied to gardens that have been built. Meanwhile, the selection of softscape in the garden that has been built tends to use flowering shrubs as a border element. The conclusion of this study is the preference for material selection that is different in terms of functionality and aesthetics is caused by the pandemic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信