通过评估牙科学生的表现来评价不同的教学方法

Q3 Dentistry
Milena Miranda Goulart Guirado, R. Tango, Vanessa Ramos da Silva, Vivian Silveira dos Santos Bardini, Marianne Spalding, S. Rodgher
{"title":"通过评估牙科学生的表现来评价不同的教学方法","authors":"Milena Miranda Goulart Guirado, R. Tango, Vanessa Ramos da Silva, Vivian Silveira dos Santos Bardini, Marianne Spalding, S. Rodgher","doi":"10.4322/bds.2023.e3768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of day-and evening-class students in the first semester test of Dental Materials in the School of Dentistry at São José dos Campos - UNESP, who were exposed to traditional lectures (TRAD) and Team-Based Learning (TBL). Material and Methods: The results of Dental Materials first semester test of students, from day and evening classes of 2016 were tabulated and analyzed in this research. The groups formed for the execution of the methodology were randomized using the individual global average of the previous year of the students, and the groups were composed of 6 to 7 members, maintained throughout the course. During the correction of the tests, the subject of each question and the applied methodology (TBL and TRAD) were identified. Responses of each question were graded separately according to the subject for comparison between methodologies. A total of 88 tests were evaluated. The performance was evaluated through a comparison of the average grade of each question, related to a specific learning methodology. The data were submitted to t-test. Results: The students’ overall performance was similar when both methodologies were compared. Students from day class presented higher grades with TBL whilst evening class students presented better performance in questions with traditional lectures. Conclusion: Active learning should be further implemented in Brazilian Dental Schools to change students’ habits aiming to improve their personal and social skills besides of professional technical knowledge.","PeriodicalId":37577,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Dental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of different teaching methodologies by assessing the performance of dentistry students\",\"authors\":\"Milena Miranda Goulart Guirado, R. Tango, Vanessa Ramos da Silva, Vivian Silveira dos Santos Bardini, Marianne Spalding, S. Rodgher\",\"doi\":\"10.4322/bds.2023.e3768\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of day-and evening-class students in the first semester test of Dental Materials in the School of Dentistry at São José dos Campos - UNESP, who were exposed to traditional lectures (TRAD) and Team-Based Learning (TBL). Material and Methods: The results of Dental Materials first semester test of students, from day and evening classes of 2016 were tabulated and analyzed in this research. The groups formed for the execution of the methodology were randomized using the individual global average of the previous year of the students, and the groups were composed of 6 to 7 members, maintained throughout the course. During the correction of the tests, the subject of each question and the applied methodology (TBL and TRAD) were identified. Responses of each question were graded separately according to the subject for comparison between methodologies. A total of 88 tests were evaluated. The performance was evaluated through a comparison of the average grade of each question, related to a specific learning methodology. The data were submitted to t-test. Results: The students’ overall performance was similar when both methodologies were compared. Students from day class presented higher grades with TBL whilst evening class students presented better performance in questions with traditional lectures. Conclusion: Active learning should be further implemented in Brazilian Dental Schools to change students’ habits aiming to improve their personal and social skills besides of professional technical knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37577,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Dental Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Dental Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3768\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Dental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4322/bds.2023.e3768","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较 jos dos Campos - UNESP牙科学院白班和夜校学生在传统授课(TRAD)和团队学习(TBL)方式下第一学期牙科材料测试中的表现。材料与方法:对2016年白班和夜校学生第一学期牙科材料测试结果进行制表分析。为执行该方法而组成的小组是根据前一年学生的个人全球平均水平随机分配的,每个小组由6至7名成员组成,在整个课程中保持不变。在测试的修正过程中,确定了每个问题的主题和应用的方法(TBL和TRAD)。每个问题的回答都根据主题单独评分,以便比较方法。总共评估了88项试验。通过与特定学习方法相关的每个问题的平均成绩的比较来评估表现。数据进行t检验。结果:两种方法比较后,学生的整体表现相似。日间班学生使用TBL的成绩较高,夜校学生使用传统授课的问题表现较好。结论:巴西牙科学校应进一步推行主动学习,改变学生的学习习惯,提高学生在专业技术知识基础上的个人能力和社交能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of different teaching methodologies by assessing the performance of dentistry students
Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the performance of day-and evening-class students in the first semester test of Dental Materials in the School of Dentistry at São José dos Campos - UNESP, who were exposed to traditional lectures (TRAD) and Team-Based Learning (TBL). Material and Methods: The results of Dental Materials first semester test of students, from day and evening classes of 2016 were tabulated and analyzed in this research. The groups formed for the execution of the methodology were randomized using the individual global average of the previous year of the students, and the groups were composed of 6 to 7 members, maintained throughout the course. During the correction of the tests, the subject of each question and the applied methodology (TBL and TRAD) were identified. Responses of each question were graded separately according to the subject for comparison between methodologies. A total of 88 tests were evaluated. The performance was evaluated through a comparison of the average grade of each question, related to a specific learning methodology. The data were submitted to t-test. Results: The students’ overall performance was similar when both methodologies were compared. Students from day class presented higher grades with TBL whilst evening class students presented better performance in questions with traditional lectures. Conclusion: Active learning should be further implemented in Brazilian Dental Schools to change students’ habits aiming to improve their personal and social skills besides of professional technical knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian Dental Science
Brazilian Dental Science Dentistry-Dentistry (all)
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
75
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal BRAZILIAN DENTAL SCIENCE is a trimonthly scientific publication of the Institute of Science and Technology of São José dos Campos - UNESP. MISSION - To disseminate and promote the interchange of scientific information amongst the national and international dental community, by means of basic and applied research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信