妇女小额信贷:有经济原因吗?来自拉丁美洲的证据

IF 0.6 Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Jamil Civitarese, R. Leite
{"title":"妇女小额信贷:有经济原因吗?来自拉丁美洲的证据","authors":"Jamil Civitarese, R. Leite","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3042338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our main research question is whether, using more robust statistical methods, the effect of the percentage of female borrowers of a Microfinance Institution (MFI) on the delinquency of the portfolio still holds. By using two samples of Latin American MFIs, we show that there is no relation between the percentage of female borrowers in an MFI portfolio and MFI economic outcomes. The relation between portfolio-at-risk and gender is not found when using a dynamic panel to account for serial autocorrelation, thus not accepting the hypothesis that women repay better than men. Hence, this paper suggests that MFIs lend more to women for reasons beyond just \"economic\" ones, such as empowering women and helping poor people, otherwise unable to access credit lines, get loans in Latin America.","PeriodicalId":47355,"journal":{"name":"Economics Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Microfinance for Women: Are There Economical Reasons? Evidence from Latin America\",\"authors\":\"Jamil Civitarese, R. Leite\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3042338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our main research question is whether, using more robust statistical methods, the effect of the percentage of female borrowers of a Microfinance Institution (MFI) on the delinquency of the portfolio still holds. By using two samples of Latin American MFIs, we show that there is no relation between the percentage of female borrowers in an MFI portfolio and MFI economic outcomes. The relation between portfolio-at-risk and gender is not found when using a dynamic panel to account for serial autocorrelation, thus not accepting the hypothesis that women repay better than men. Hence, this paper suggests that MFIs lend more to women for reasons beyond just \\\"economic\\\" ones, such as empowering women and helping poor people, otherwise unable to access credit lines, get loans in Latin America.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47355,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3042338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3042338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

我们的主要研究问题是,使用更可靠的统计方法,小额信贷机构(MFI)的女性借款人百分比对投资组合拖欠的影响是否仍然存在。通过使用拉丁美洲小额信贷机构的两个样本,我们表明小额信贷机构投资组合中女性借款人的百分比与小额信贷机构的经济成果之间没有关系。当使用动态面板来解释序列自相关时,没有发现风险投资组合与性别之间的关系,因此不接受女性比男性回报更好的假设。因此,本文认为小额信贷机构向妇女提供更多贷款的原因不仅仅是“经济”原因,例如赋予妇女权力和帮助穷人,否则无法获得信贷额度,在拉丁美洲获得贷款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Microfinance for Women: Are There Economical Reasons? Evidence from Latin America
Our main research question is whether, using more robust statistical methods, the effect of the percentage of female borrowers of a Microfinance Institution (MFI) on the delinquency of the portfolio still holds. By using two samples of Latin American MFIs, we show that there is no relation between the percentage of female borrowers in an MFI portfolio and MFI economic outcomes. The relation between portfolio-at-risk and gender is not found when using a dynamic panel to account for serial autocorrelation, thus not accepting the hypothesis that women repay better than men. Hence, this paper suggests that MFIs lend more to women for reasons beyond just "economic" ones, such as empowering women and helping poor people, otherwise unable to access credit lines, get loans in Latin America.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economics Bulletin
Economics Bulletin ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The Economic Bulletin is an open-access letters journal founded in 2001 with the mission of providing free and extremely rapid scientific communication across the entire community of research economists. EB publishes original notes, comments, and preliminary results. We are especially interested in publishingmanuscripts that keep the profession informed about on-going research programs. Our publication standard is that a manuscript be original, correct and of interest to a specialist. Submissions in these categories are refereed and our objective is to make a decision within two months. Accepted papers are published immediately. It is expected that in many cases, manuscripts published in these categories will form the foundation for more complete works to besubsequently submitted to other journals. In all cases, submissions are restricted to seven printed pages exclusive of references, tables, figures, and appendices, and must be in PDF format. EB also publishes non-refereed letters to the editor, conference announcements and research announcements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信