耳聋与语言发展研究的医学和社会模式述评

Q2 Arts and Humanities
G. Morgan
{"title":"耳聋与语言发展研究的医学和社会模式述评","authors":"G. Morgan","doi":"10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on deaf children’s language development has a long and complex history. Work is motivated by seemingly incompatible models of what deafness means. On the one hand, the dominant medical model documents hearing loss and spoken language deficits. Research contributes to continuing improvements in spoken language outcomes following neo-natal screening and early cochlear implants. On the other hand, the smaller number of researchers looking at deafness and language development in the social model have championed the diversity of deaf children, their rights to learn signed languages and be educated in bilingual schools. This paper covers a selection of research studies on deafness and language development coming from both the medical and social models.The main objective of the paper is to offer some remarks concerning a set of standpoints taken by researchers which require more careful discussion in order to further thefield. It concludes with a suggestion for how the two diverging models could convergemore. The proposal is to focus attention on the factors which lead to high quality earlycommunicative interactions rather than access to words or signs.","PeriodicalId":38590,"journal":{"name":"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Remarks on the medical and social models of research in deafness and language development\",\"authors\":\"G. Morgan\",\"doi\":\"10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-135\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on deaf children’s language development has a long and complex history. Work is motivated by seemingly incompatible models of what deafness means. On the one hand, the dominant medical model documents hearing loss and spoken language deficits. Research contributes to continuing improvements in spoken language outcomes following neo-natal screening and early cochlear implants. On the other hand, the smaller number of researchers looking at deafness and language development in the social model have championed the diversity of deaf children, their rights to learn signed languages and be educated in bilingual schools. This paper covers a selection of research studies on deafness and language development coming from both the medical and social models.The main objective of the paper is to offer some remarks concerning a set of standpoints taken by researchers which require more careful discussion in order to further thefield. It concludes with a suggestion for how the two diverging models could convergemore. The proposal is to focus attention on the factors which lead to high quality earlycommunicative interactions rather than access to words or signs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38590,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-135\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21827/32.8310/2022-sg-135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对聋儿语言发展的研究有着悠久而复杂的历史。对失聪含义的理解似乎是不相容的。一方面,占主导地位的医学模式记录听力损失和口语缺陷。研究有助于新生儿筛查和早期人工耳蜗植入后口语结果的持续改善。另一方面,在社会模式中关注耳聋和语言发展的少数研究人员支持聋哑儿童的多样性,支持他们学习手语和在双语学校接受教育的权利。本文从医学和社会两方面对耳聋和语言发展的研究进行了综述。本文的主要目的是提供一些评论关于一组立场采取的研究人员需要更仔细的讨论,以进一步的领域。最后,对这两种不同的模型如何趋同提出了建议。建议将注意力集中在导致高质量早期交流互动的因素上,而不是获得文字或符号。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Remarks on the medical and social models of research in deafness and language development
Research on deaf children’s language development has a long and complex history. Work is motivated by seemingly incompatible models of what deafness means. On the one hand, the dominant medical model documents hearing loss and spoken language deficits. Research contributes to continuing improvements in spoken language outcomes following neo-natal screening and early cochlear implants. On the other hand, the smaller number of researchers looking at deafness and language development in the social model have championed the diversity of deaf children, their rights to learn signed languages and be educated in bilingual schools. This paper covers a selection of research studies on deafness and language development coming from both the medical and social models.The main objective of the paper is to offer some remarks concerning a set of standpoints taken by researchers which require more careful discussion in order to further thefield. It concludes with a suggestion for how the two diverging models could convergemore. The proposal is to focus attention on the factors which lead to high quality earlycommunicative interactions rather than access to words or signs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie
Stem-, Spraak- en Taalpathologie Arts and Humanities-Language and Linguistics
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信