英国代表制下共同基金的创设与分配

Rachael Mulheron
{"title":"英国代表制下共同基金的创设与分配","authors":"Rachael Mulheron","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1904592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In his claim against Google LLC (‘Google’) for data infringement on behalf of millions of Apple iPhone users, Richard Lloyd has fashioned a ground-breaking and laudatory attempt to obtain modest, yet meaningful, damages for each class member. Mr Lloyd is using the English representative rule (contained in CPR 19.6) to do so, given the continuing absence of any comprehensive and generic class action in this jurisdiction. The litigation has been rightly described by the Court of Appeal as ‘an unusual and innovative use of the representative procedure’. A further appeal is destined for hearing in the Supreme Court in late April 2021. There is no doubt that the representative rule has some characteristics of a more expanded class action procedure, given how it has come to be interpreted over its long history. The question posed in this article, however, is whether the representative rule can facilitate this action, in two respects.","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"38 1","pages":"381 - 413"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creating, and Distributing, Common Funds Under the English Representative Rule\",\"authors\":\"Rachael Mulheron\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2021.1904592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In his claim against Google LLC (‘Google’) for data infringement on behalf of millions of Apple iPhone users, Richard Lloyd has fashioned a ground-breaking and laudatory attempt to obtain modest, yet meaningful, damages for each class member. Mr Lloyd is using the English representative rule (contained in CPR 19.6) to do so, given the continuing absence of any comprehensive and generic class action in this jurisdiction. The litigation has been rightly described by the Court of Appeal as ‘an unusual and innovative use of the representative procedure’. A further appeal is destined for hearing in the Supreme Court in late April 2021. There is no doubt that the representative rule has some characteristics of a more expanded class action procedure, given how it has come to be interpreted over its long history. The question posed in this article, however, is whether the representative rule can facilitate this action, in two respects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"381 - 413\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1904592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1904592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理查德•劳埃德(Richard Lloyd)代表数百万苹果(Apple) iPhone用户起诉谷歌(Google LLC)数据侵权,他开创了一个开创性的、值得称赞的尝试,为每位原告成员争取到适度但有意义的损害赔偿。鉴于在英国司法管辖区仍未发生任何全面和通用的集体诉讼,劳埃德先生正在使用英国代表规则(包含在CPR 19.6中)来做到这一点。上诉法院正确地将该诉讼描述为“对代表程序的不寻常和创新的使用”。进一步的上诉将于2021年4月底在最高法院举行听证会。毫无疑问,鉴于其在漫长的历史中是如何被解释的,代表规则具有更广泛的集体诉讼程序的某些特征。然而,本文提出的问题是,代表规则能否在两个方面促进这一行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Creating, and Distributing, Common Funds Under the English Representative Rule
In his claim against Google LLC (‘Google’) for data infringement on behalf of millions of Apple iPhone users, Richard Lloyd has fashioned a ground-breaking and laudatory attempt to obtain modest, yet meaningful, damages for each class member. Mr Lloyd is using the English representative rule (contained in CPR 19.6) to do so, given the continuing absence of any comprehensive and generic class action in this jurisdiction. The litigation has been rightly described by the Court of Appeal as ‘an unusual and innovative use of the representative procedure’. A further appeal is destined for hearing in the Supreme Court in late April 2021. There is no doubt that the representative rule has some characteristics of a more expanded class action procedure, given how it has come to be interpreted over its long history. The question posed in this article, however, is whether the representative rule can facilitate this action, in two respects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信