曲尼司特预防再狭窄的结果及其预后(PRESTO)试验

David R. Holmes, M. Savage, J. Lablanche, L. Grip, P. Serruys, P. Fitzgerald, D. Fischman, S. Goldberg, Jeffrey A. Brinker, A. Zeiher, Leonard M. Shapiro, J. Willerson, Barry R. Davis, James J. Ferguson, J. Popma, Spencer B. King, A. M. Lincoff, J. Tcheng, R. Chan, J. Granett, M. Poland
{"title":"曲尼司特预防再狭窄的结果及其预后(PRESTO)试验","authors":"David R. Holmes, M. Savage, J. Lablanche, L. Grip, P. Serruys, P. Fitzgerald, D. Fischman, S. Goldberg, Jeffrey A. Brinker, A. Zeiher, Leonard M. Shapiro, J. Willerson, Barry R. Davis, James J. Ferguson, J. Popma, Spencer B. King, A. M. Lincoff, J. Tcheng, R. Chan, J. Granett, M. Poland","doi":"10.1161/01.CIR.0000028335.31300.DA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background—Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a major problem affecting 15% to 30% of patients after stent placement. No oral agent has shown a beneficial effect on restenosis or on associated major adverse cardiovascular events. In limited trials, the oral agent tranilast has been shown to decrease the frequency of angiographic restenosis after PCI. Methods and Results—In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tranilast (300 and 450 mg BID for 1 or 3 months), 11 484 patients were enrolled. Enrollment and drug were initiated within 4 hours after successful PCI of at least 1 vessel. The primary end point was the first occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 9 months and was 15.8% in the placebo group and 15.5% to 16.1% in the tranilast groups (P =0.77 to 0.81). Myocardial infarction was the only component of major adverse cardiovascular events to show some evidence of a reduction with tranilast (450 mg BID for 3 months): 1.1% versus 1.8% with placebo (P =0.061 for intent-to-treat population). The primary reason for not completing treatment was ≥1 hepatic laboratory test abnormality (11.4% versus 0.2% with placebo, P <0.01). In the angiographic substudy composed of 2018 patients, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was measured by quantitative coronary angiography. At follow-up, MLD was 1.76±0.77 mm in the placebo group, which was not different from MLD in the tranilast groups (1.72 to 1.78±0.76 to 80 mm, P =0.49 to 0.89). In a subset of these patients (n=1107), intravascular ultrasound was performed at follow-up. Plaque volume was not different between the placebo and tranilast groups (39.3 versus 37.5 to 46.1 mm3, respectively;P =0.16 to 0.72). Conclusions—Tranilast does not improve the quantitative measures of restenosis (angiographic and intravascular ultrasound) or its clinical sequelae.","PeriodicalId":10194,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","volume":"1 1","pages":"1243-1250"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"263","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Results of Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) Trial\",\"authors\":\"David R. Holmes, M. Savage, J. Lablanche, L. Grip, P. Serruys, P. Fitzgerald, D. Fischman, S. Goldberg, Jeffrey A. Brinker, A. Zeiher, Leonard M. Shapiro, J. Willerson, Barry R. Davis, James J. Ferguson, J. Popma, Spencer B. King, A. M. Lincoff, J. Tcheng, R. Chan, J. Granett, M. Poland\",\"doi\":\"10.1161/01.CIR.0000028335.31300.DA\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background—Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a major problem affecting 15% to 30% of patients after stent placement. No oral agent has shown a beneficial effect on restenosis or on associated major adverse cardiovascular events. In limited trials, the oral agent tranilast has been shown to decrease the frequency of angiographic restenosis after PCI. Methods and Results—In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tranilast (300 and 450 mg BID for 1 or 3 months), 11 484 patients were enrolled. Enrollment and drug were initiated within 4 hours after successful PCI of at least 1 vessel. The primary end point was the first occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 9 months and was 15.8% in the placebo group and 15.5% to 16.1% in the tranilast groups (P =0.77 to 0.81). Myocardial infarction was the only component of major adverse cardiovascular events to show some evidence of a reduction with tranilast (450 mg BID for 3 months): 1.1% versus 1.8% with placebo (P =0.061 for intent-to-treat population). The primary reason for not completing treatment was ≥1 hepatic laboratory test abnormality (11.4% versus 0.2% with placebo, P <0.01). In the angiographic substudy composed of 2018 patients, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was measured by quantitative coronary angiography. At follow-up, MLD was 1.76±0.77 mm in the placebo group, which was not different from MLD in the tranilast groups (1.72 to 1.78±0.76 to 80 mm, P =0.49 to 0.89). In a subset of these patients (n=1107), intravascular ultrasound was performed at follow-up. Plaque volume was not different between the placebo and tranilast groups (39.3 versus 37.5 to 46.1 mm3, respectively;P =0.16 to 0.72). Conclusions—Tranilast does not improve the quantitative measures of restenosis (angiographic and intravascular ultrasound) or its clinical sequelae.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10194,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1243-1250\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2002-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"263\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000028335.31300.DA\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000028335.31300.DA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 263

摘要

背景:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后再狭窄是影响15% - 30%支架置入术患者的主要问题。没有口服药物显示对再狭窄或相关的主要不良心血管事件有有益作用。在有限的试验中,口服曲尼司特已被证明可以降低PCI术后血管造影再狭窄的频率。方法与结果:在这项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验中,纳入了11484例患者。曲尼司特(300和450 mg BID, 1或3个月)。至少1条血管PCI成功后4小时内开始入组和用药。主要终点是9个月内首次发生死亡、心肌梗死或缺血驱动的靶血管重建术,安慰剂组为15.8%,曲尼司特组为15.5%至16.1% (P =0.77至0.81)。心肌梗死是显示曲尼司特(450mg BID, 3个月)降低主要不良心血管事件的唯一组成部分:1.1%,而安慰剂组为1.8%(意向治疗人群P =0.061)。未完成治疗的主要原因是肝脏实验室检查异常≥1次(11.4%比安慰剂组0.2%,P <0.01)。在由2018例患者组成的血管造影亚研究中,通过定量冠状动脉造影测量最小管腔直径(MLD)。随访时,安慰剂组的MLD为1.76±0.77 mm,与曲尼司特组的MLD(1.72 ~ 1.78±0.76 ~ 80 mm, P =0.49 ~ 0.89)无显著差异。其中一部分患者(n=1107)在随访时进行了血管内超声检查。斑块体积在安慰剂组和曲尼司特组之间没有差异(分别为39.3和37.5至46.1 mm3;P =0.16至0.72)。结论:曲尼司特不能改善再狭窄的定量指标(血管造影和血管内超声)及其临床后遗症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Results of Prevention of REStenosis with Tranilast and its Outcomes (PRESTO) Trial
Background—Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a major problem affecting 15% to 30% of patients after stent placement. No oral agent has shown a beneficial effect on restenosis or on associated major adverse cardiovascular events. In limited trials, the oral agent tranilast has been shown to decrease the frequency of angiographic restenosis after PCI. Methods and Results—In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of tranilast (300 and 450 mg BID for 1 or 3 months), 11 484 patients were enrolled. Enrollment and drug were initiated within 4 hours after successful PCI of at least 1 vessel. The primary end point was the first occurrence of death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven target vessel revascularization within 9 months and was 15.8% in the placebo group and 15.5% to 16.1% in the tranilast groups (P =0.77 to 0.81). Myocardial infarction was the only component of major adverse cardiovascular events to show some evidence of a reduction with tranilast (450 mg BID for 3 months): 1.1% versus 1.8% with placebo (P =0.061 for intent-to-treat population). The primary reason for not completing treatment was ≥1 hepatic laboratory test abnormality (11.4% versus 0.2% with placebo, P <0.01). In the angiographic substudy composed of 2018 patients, minimal lumen diameter (MLD) was measured by quantitative coronary angiography. At follow-up, MLD was 1.76±0.77 mm in the placebo group, which was not different from MLD in the tranilast groups (1.72 to 1.78±0.76 to 80 mm, P =0.49 to 0.89). In a subset of these patients (n=1107), intravascular ultrasound was performed at follow-up. Plaque volume was not different between the placebo and tranilast groups (39.3 versus 37.5 to 46.1 mm3, respectively;P =0.16 to 0.72). Conclusions—Tranilast does not improve the quantitative measures of restenosis (angiographic and intravascular ultrasound) or its clinical sequelae.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信