《印度尼西亚共和国申诉专员的裁决当局的建议》

Musriza Musriza, Eddy Purnama, M. Mahfud
{"title":"《印度尼西亚共和国申诉专员的裁决当局的建议》","authors":"Musriza Musriza, Eddy Purnama, M. Mahfud","doi":"10.24815/kanun.v23i2.21521","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research investigates the Ombudsman recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention and the efforts that against government agencies which do not implemented their duties. This juridical-normative research uses four kinds of approach like statute, historical, conceptual and comparative approach. The Ombuds-man’s existence after 19 years establishment can be said hasn’t fully work as that institution expectation. The responsibility to accept all complaint about maladminis-tration especially in public services just relied only by issues the recommendations about conclusions and suggestions. Ombudsman doesn’t has the authority to execute the result of their investigations, so that the rules of recommendation’s implementation are weak. The 2016-2020 period’s recommendation haven’t implemented optimal enough. Therefore, recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention need to equalizing the perspective and detailed the implementation rules, so that a stronger legal protection about the position and also the function of its recommen-dations can be achieving prosperity.","PeriodicalId":31748,"journal":{"name":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"42 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Recommendation or the Adjudication Authority of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Musriza Musriza, Eddy Purnama, M. Mahfud\",\"doi\":\"10.24815/kanun.v23i2.21521\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research investigates the Ombudsman recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention and the efforts that against government agencies which do not implemented their duties. This juridical-normative research uses four kinds of approach like statute, historical, conceptual and comparative approach. The Ombuds-man’s existence after 19 years establishment can be said hasn’t fully work as that institution expectation. The responsibility to accept all complaint about maladminis-tration especially in public services just relied only by issues the recommendations about conclusions and suggestions. Ombudsman doesn’t has the authority to execute the result of their investigations, so that the rules of recommendation’s implementation are weak. The 2016-2020 period’s recommendation haven’t implemented optimal enough. Therefore, recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention need to equalizing the perspective and detailed the implementation rules, so that a stronger legal protection about the position and also the function of its recommen-dations can be achieving prosperity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i2.21521\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v23i2.21521","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了申诉专员建议作为预防行政失当的改进和对政府机构不履行职责的努力。本研究主要采用成文法、历史法、概念法和比较法四种研究方法。监察员制度成立19年来的存在,可以说并没有完全达到制度的预期。接受所有关于行政管理不善的投诉的责任,特别是在公共服务方面,仅仅依赖于发布关于结论和建议的建议。申诉专员没有权力执行他们的调查结果,因此建议的执行规则很弱。2016-2020年期间的建议执行得不够理想。因此,建议作为行政失当预防的完善,需要均衡化的视角和细化的实施细则,这样才能使建议的地位和功能得到更强有力的法律保护,从而实现完善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Recommendation or the Adjudication Authority of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia
This research investigates the Ombudsman recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention and the efforts that against government agencies which do not implemented their duties. This juridical-normative research uses four kinds of approach like statute, historical, conceptual and comparative approach. The Ombuds-man’s existence after 19 years establishment can be said hasn’t fully work as that institution expectation. The responsibility to accept all complaint about maladminis-tration especially in public services just relied only by issues the recommendations about conclusions and suggestions. Ombudsman doesn’t has the authority to execute the result of their investigations, so that the rules of recommendation’s implementation are weak. The 2016-2020 period’s recommendation haven’t implemented optimal enough. Therefore, recommendations as the improvement of the maladministration’s prevention need to equalizing the perspective and detailed the implementation rules, so that a stronger legal protection about the position and also the function of its recommen-dations can be achieving prosperity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信