一种将不确定性纳入研发成本和绩效数据的方法

Stephen Barrager, Oliver Gildersleeve
{"title":"一种将不确定性纳入研发成本和绩效数据的方法","authors":"Stephen Barrager,&nbsp;Oliver Gildersleeve","doi":"10.1016/0165-0572(90)90013-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper describes and demonstrates a methodology developed for the Electric Power Research Institute that combines modeling, sensitivity analysis and subjective probability encoding to analyze the cost differences between projects competing for R&amp;D funds. The methodology involves two distinct stages: a deterministic stage and a probabilistic stage. The deterministic stage sets ground rules for comparison, compiles variables and ranges, specifies a cost model, identifies key variables by sensitivity analysis, and reviews the outcome by participants involved. The probabilistic stage determines probability distributions for the key variables and then calculates probability distributions for project costs based on the cost model and distributions of key variables. The paper then demonstrates this methodology by describing a case study step-by-step. The case study is an EPRI comparison of an integrated gasificationcombined cycle plant with a conentional coal plant with flue gas desulfurization. Finally a critique of the methodology is given.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101080,"journal":{"name":"Resources and Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(90)90013-9","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A methodology to incorporate uncertainty into R&D cost and performance data\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Barrager,&nbsp;Oliver Gildersleeve\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0165-0572(90)90013-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This paper describes and demonstrates a methodology developed for the Electric Power Research Institute that combines modeling, sensitivity analysis and subjective probability encoding to analyze the cost differences between projects competing for R&amp;D funds. The methodology involves two distinct stages: a deterministic stage and a probabilistic stage. The deterministic stage sets ground rules for comparison, compiles variables and ranges, specifies a cost model, identifies key variables by sensitivity analysis, and reviews the outcome by participants involved. The probabilistic stage determines probability distributions for the key variables and then calculates probability distributions for project costs based on the cost model and distributions of key variables. The paper then demonstrates this methodology by describing a case study step-by-step. The case study is an EPRI comparison of an integrated gasificationcombined cycle plant with a conentional coal plant with flue gas desulfurization. Finally a critique of the methodology is given.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101080,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0165-0572(90)90013-9\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources and Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165057290900139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources and Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0165057290900139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述并演示了为电力研究所开发的一种方法,该方法结合了建模、敏感性分析和主观概率编码来分析竞争研发资金的项目之间的成本差异。该方法包括两个不同的阶段:确定性阶段和概率阶段。确定性阶段为比较设定基本规则,编译变量和范围,指定成本模型,通过敏感性分析确定关键变量,并审查相关参与者的结果。概率阶段确定关键变量的概率分布,然后根据成本模型和关键变量的分布计算项目成本的概率分布。然后,本文通过逐步描述一个案例研究来演示这种方法。案例研究是综合气化联合循环电厂与传统燃煤电厂烟气脱硫的EPRI比较。最后,对该方法进行了批判。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A methodology to incorporate uncertainty into R&D cost and performance data

This paper describes and demonstrates a methodology developed for the Electric Power Research Institute that combines modeling, sensitivity analysis and subjective probability encoding to analyze the cost differences between projects competing for R&D funds. The methodology involves two distinct stages: a deterministic stage and a probabilistic stage. The deterministic stage sets ground rules for comparison, compiles variables and ranges, specifies a cost model, identifies key variables by sensitivity analysis, and reviews the outcome by participants involved. The probabilistic stage determines probability distributions for the key variables and then calculates probability distributions for project costs based on the cost model and distributions of key variables. The paper then demonstrates this methodology by describing a case study step-by-step. The case study is an EPRI comparison of an integrated gasificationcombined cycle plant with a conentional coal plant with flue gas desulfurization. Finally a critique of the methodology is given.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信