法律、合法性与联合国

IF 1 Q2 LAW
R. Thakur
{"title":"法律、合法性与联合国","authors":"R. Thakur","doi":"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199781577.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The gulf between law and legitimacy - a distinction popularised in the context of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's intervention in Kosovo in 1999 - is a more serious crisis-in-the-making for the United Nations than is commonly realised. The reason for the under-estimation of the extent and gravity of the gap is that different segments of the international community have problems with different elements of the gap and fail to capture the several dimensions in their cumulative effect. This is illustrated with respect to international law and international humanitarian law, sanctions, nuclear weapons, atrocity crimes and international interventions, international criminal justice, the Security Council, the UN-United States relationship, and UN integrity systems.","PeriodicalId":42243,"journal":{"name":"Melbourne Journal of International Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law, Legitimacy and United Nations\",\"authors\":\"R. Thakur\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199781577.003.0002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The gulf between law and legitimacy - a distinction popularised in the context of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's intervention in Kosovo in 1999 - is a more serious crisis-in-the-making for the United Nations than is commonly realised. The reason for the under-estimation of the extent and gravity of the gap is that different segments of the international community have problems with different elements of the gap and fail to capture the several dimensions in their cumulative effect. This is illustrated with respect to international law and international humanitarian law, sanctions, nuclear weapons, atrocity crimes and international interventions, international criminal justice, the Security Council, the UN-United States relationship, and UN integrity systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Melbourne Journal of International Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"18\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Melbourne Journal of International Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199781577.003.0002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Melbourne Journal of International Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199781577.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

摘要

法律与合法性之间的鸿沟- -在北大西洋公约组织1999年对科索沃的干预中得到普及的一种区别- -是联合国正在形成的一种比人们通常认识到的更为严重的危机。对差距的程度和严重性估计不足的原因是,国际社会的不同部分对差距的不同因素有不同的问题,并且未能在其累积影响中抓住几个方面。国际法和国际人道主义法、制裁、核武器、暴行罪和国际干预、国际刑事司法、安全理事会、联合国与美国的关系以及联合国的廉正制度都说明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Law, Legitimacy and United Nations
The gulf between law and legitimacy - a distinction popularised in the context of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization's intervention in Kosovo in 1999 - is a more serious crisis-in-the-making for the United Nations than is commonly realised. The reason for the under-estimation of the extent and gravity of the gap is that different segments of the international community have problems with different elements of the gap and fail to capture the several dimensions in their cumulative effect. This is illustrated with respect to international law and international humanitarian law, sanctions, nuclear weapons, atrocity crimes and international interventions, international criminal justice, the Security Council, the UN-United States relationship, and UN integrity systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信