海洋岩土工程设计中适当固结系数的选择

D. White, Jinbo Chen, S. Gourvenec, C. O’Loughlin
{"title":"海洋岩土工程设计中适当固结系数的选择","authors":"D. White, Jinbo Chen, S. Gourvenec, C. O’Loughlin","doi":"10.1115/OMAE2019-95800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper addresses the selection of an appropriate consolidation coefficient for the analysis of drainage beneath foundations and pipelines in offshore geotechnical design. An emerging trend in the design of subsea infrastructure is the consideration of ‘whole life’ effects — namely the changes in soil properties and geotechnical capacity over the operating life.\n Seabed pipelines that undergo repeated thermal expansion and contraction cause shearing and consolidation in the underlying soil, leading to significant changes in the available seabed friction. Also, foundations that are either fixed or designed to slide on the seabed, are subjected to intermittent loads interspersed with periods of consolidation. These also cause a change in seabed strength and geotechnical capacity.\n To assess the time over which these effects occur, and therefore their influence on the response and the reliability of the system, it is necessary to perform consolidation calculations, using an appropriate consolidation coefficient. This paper presents observed operative consolidation coefficients drawn from recent model testing measurements and numerical analyses. It is shown that the consolidation rate can vary by more than an order of magnitude for the same soil profile under different loading conditions, due to the differences in stiffness and permeability. Meanwhile, design parameters are commonly drawn from one-dimensional oedometer compression tests.\n This compendium of data highlights the potential variation in consolidation coefficient for different loading types and through the ‘whole life’ of infrastructure. A key conclusion is that consolidation effects generally occur faster than is commonly assumed, meaning that changes in strength and stiffness — that are commonly beneficial in design — may be more readily relied on than is done so in current practice.","PeriodicalId":23567,"journal":{"name":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Selection of an Appropriate Consolidation Coefficient for Offshore Geotechnical Design\",\"authors\":\"D. White, Jinbo Chen, S. Gourvenec, C. O’Loughlin\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/OMAE2019-95800\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper addresses the selection of an appropriate consolidation coefficient for the analysis of drainage beneath foundations and pipelines in offshore geotechnical design. An emerging trend in the design of subsea infrastructure is the consideration of ‘whole life’ effects — namely the changes in soil properties and geotechnical capacity over the operating life.\\n Seabed pipelines that undergo repeated thermal expansion and contraction cause shearing and consolidation in the underlying soil, leading to significant changes in the available seabed friction. Also, foundations that are either fixed or designed to slide on the seabed, are subjected to intermittent loads interspersed with periods of consolidation. These also cause a change in seabed strength and geotechnical capacity.\\n To assess the time over which these effects occur, and therefore their influence on the response and the reliability of the system, it is necessary to perform consolidation calculations, using an appropriate consolidation coefficient. This paper presents observed operative consolidation coefficients drawn from recent model testing measurements and numerical analyses. It is shown that the consolidation rate can vary by more than an order of magnitude for the same soil profile under different loading conditions, due to the differences in stiffness and permeability. Meanwhile, design parameters are commonly drawn from one-dimensional oedometer compression tests.\\n This compendium of data highlights the potential variation in consolidation coefficient for different loading types and through the ‘whole life’ of infrastructure. A key conclusion is that consolidation effects generally occur faster than is commonly assumed, meaning that changes in strength and stiffness — that are commonly beneficial in design — may be more readily relied on than is done so in current practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23567,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2019-95800\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 1: Offshore Technology; Offshore Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2019-95800","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文讨论了海上岩土工程设计中基础及管道下排水分析中固结系数的选择问题。海底基础设施设计的一个新趋势是考虑“全寿命”效应,即在使用寿命期间土壤性质和岩土承载力的变化。海底管道经过反复的热胀冷缩,导致下垫土发生剪切和固结,从而导致可利用的海底摩擦力发生显著变化。此外,无论是固定的还是设计用于在海床上滑动的基础,都要承受间歇性的荷载,其间穿插着固结期。这些也会导致海底强度和岩土承载力的变化。为了评估这些影响发生的时间,以及它们对响应和系统可靠性的影响,有必要使用适当的固结系数进行固结计算。本文介绍了从最近的模型试验测量和数值分析中得出的实际操作固结系数。结果表明,在不同荷载条件下,由于刚度和渗透性的差异,同一土体剖面的固结速率会发生一个数量级以上的变化。同时,设计参数通常取自一维测径仪压缩试验。该数据概要强调了不同加载类型和基础设施“整个生命周期”中固结系数的潜在变化。一个关键的结论是,固结效应通常比通常假设的发生得更快,这意味着强度和刚度的变化——通常在设计中是有益的——可能比目前的实践更容易依赖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Selection of an Appropriate Consolidation Coefficient for Offshore Geotechnical Design
This paper addresses the selection of an appropriate consolidation coefficient for the analysis of drainage beneath foundations and pipelines in offshore geotechnical design. An emerging trend in the design of subsea infrastructure is the consideration of ‘whole life’ effects — namely the changes in soil properties and geotechnical capacity over the operating life. Seabed pipelines that undergo repeated thermal expansion and contraction cause shearing and consolidation in the underlying soil, leading to significant changes in the available seabed friction. Also, foundations that are either fixed or designed to slide on the seabed, are subjected to intermittent loads interspersed with periods of consolidation. These also cause a change in seabed strength and geotechnical capacity. To assess the time over which these effects occur, and therefore their influence on the response and the reliability of the system, it is necessary to perform consolidation calculations, using an appropriate consolidation coefficient. This paper presents observed operative consolidation coefficients drawn from recent model testing measurements and numerical analyses. It is shown that the consolidation rate can vary by more than an order of magnitude for the same soil profile under different loading conditions, due to the differences in stiffness and permeability. Meanwhile, design parameters are commonly drawn from one-dimensional oedometer compression tests. This compendium of data highlights the potential variation in consolidation coefficient for different loading types and through the ‘whole life’ of infrastructure. A key conclusion is that consolidation effects generally occur faster than is commonly assumed, meaning that changes in strength and stiffness — that are commonly beneficial in design — may be more readily relied on than is done so in current practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信