John Ward , Ken Tyer , Jesse Coats , Gabbrielle Williams , Shauna Weigand , Danielle Cockburn
{"title":"寰枢操纵对心血管生理的直接影响","authors":"John Ward , Ken Tyer , Jesse Coats , Gabbrielle Williams , Shauna Weigand , Danielle Cockburn","doi":"10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aims of this study were (1) to determine if there were any statistically significant immediate effects of atlas Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) on </span>cardiovascular physiology among normotensive individuals and (2) to quantify those responses if they were found.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Human physiology lab.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Forty-eight college students (age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.4 years, height<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.70<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.10<!--> <!-->m, body mass<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->76.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->20.1<!--> <!-->kg: mean<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->SD) were sampled in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Participants were equally randomized into four study groups: left head-turn control, no contact control, left atlas manipulation, and right atlas manipulation. The CMT provided was a cervical break. Electrocardiogram (ECG), bilateral pulse oximetry, and bilateral </span>blood pressure measurement were performed at baseline, post 1-min intervention, post 10-min intervention, and approximately post 24-h (±1</span> <!-->h) intervention. Between-group dependent variables were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at each time point.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant difference was shown among any between-group cardiovascular dependent variables in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this research suggest cardiovascular physiology is not affected by CMT of the atlas in normotensive individuals. These findings in relation to existing research suggest future cervical spine CMT studies should be performed focusing on hypertensive patients.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100267,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Chiropractic","volume":"15 3","pages":"Pages 147-157"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Immediate effects of atlas manipulation on cardiovascular physiology\",\"authors\":\"John Ward , Ken Tyer , Jesse Coats , Gabbrielle Williams , Shauna Weigand , Danielle Cockburn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p><span>The aims of this study were (1) to determine if there were any statistically significant immediate effects of atlas Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) on </span>cardiovascular physiology among normotensive individuals and (2) to quantify those responses if they were found.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Human physiology lab.</p></div><div><h3>Subjects</h3><p>Forty-eight college students (age<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25.9<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->3.4 years, height<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->1.70<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->0.10<!--> <!-->m, body mass<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->76.2<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->20.1<!--> <!-->kg: mean<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->SD) were sampled in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span><span>Participants were equally randomized into four study groups: left head-turn control, no contact control, left atlas manipulation, and right atlas manipulation. The CMT provided was a cervical break. Electrocardiogram (ECG), bilateral pulse oximetry, and bilateral </span>blood pressure measurement were performed at baseline, post 1-min intervention, post 10-min intervention, and approximately post 24-h (±1</span> <!-->h) intervention. Between-group dependent variables were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at each time point.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No statistically significant difference was shown among any between-group cardiovascular dependent variables in this study.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The results of this research suggest cardiovascular physiology is not affected by CMT of the atlas in normotensive individuals. These findings in relation to existing research suggest future cervical spine CMT studies should be performed focusing on hypertensive patients.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Chiropractic\",\"volume\":\"15 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 147-157\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.clch.2012.10.036\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Chiropractic\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479235412001150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Chiropractic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1479235412001150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Immediate effects of atlas manipulation on cardiovascular physiology
Objective
The aims of this study were (1) to determine if there were any statistically significant immediate effects of atlas Chiropractic Manipulative Therapy (CMT) on cardiovascular physiology among normotensive individuals and (2) to quantify those responses if they were found.
Design
A single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Setting
Human physiology lab.
Subjects
Forty-eight college students (age = 25.9 ± 3.4 years, height = 1.70 ± 0.10 m, body mass = 76.2 ± 20.1 kg: mean ± SD) were sampled in this study.
Methods
Participants were equally randomized into four study groups: left head-turn control, no contact control, left atlas manipulation, and right atlas manipulation. The CMT provided was a cervical break. Electrocardiogram (ECG), bilateral pulse oximetry, and bilateral blood pressure measurement were performed at baseline, post 1-min intervention, post 10-min intervention, and approximately post 24-h (±1 h) intervention. Between-group dependent variables were analyzed through one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) at each time point.
Results
No statistically significant difference was shown among any between-group cardiovascular dependent variables in this study.
Conclusions
The results of this research suggest cardiovascular physiology is not affected by CMT of the atlas in normotensive individuals. These findings in relation to existing research suggest future cervical spine CMT studies should be performed focusing on hypertensive patients.