{"title":"在“这里”和“那里”之间的罗马尼亚移民的孩子:家庭依恋的故事","authors":"R. Bratu","doi":"10.1515/scr-2015-0007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract By analysing interviews from a larger qualitative study conducted in a Romanian village (Vulturu, Vrancea County) from the South-East region of the country, this paper explores the ways Romanian migrants’ children who were born in the country of origin but migrated to Italy or the so-called 1.5 Generation (Rumbaut 2002; 2012) talk about their ties with the home country. In other words, is Romania presented as more - or something else - than the original homeland? The study analyses the concept of home attachment in terms of transnationalism understood as affective ties (Huynh and Yiu 2012; Paraschivescu 2011). Based on evidence from interview data a typology of attachment to the home country is outlined and further discussed. The results point to the conclusion that the issue of attachment to the home country is discursively constructed by respondents both explicitly and implicitly by multiple references to the family migration project and their immigrant status at destination. Moreover, I argue that the different types of attachment identified in the interviewees’ discourses are mediated by the subjective assessment of the integration experience into the host country.","PeriodicalId":83295,"journal":{"name":"The Urban & social change review","volume":"45 1","pages":"27 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Children of Romanian Migrants between “Here” and “There”: Stories of Home Attachment\",\"authors\":\"R. Bratu\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/scr-2015-0007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract By analysing interviews from a larger qualitative study conducted in a Romanian village (Vulturu, Vrancea County) from the South-East region of the country, this paper explores the ways Romanian migrants’ children who were born in the country of origin but migrated to Italy or the so-called 1.5 Generation (Rumbaut 2002; 2012) talk about their ties with the home country. In other words, is Romania presented as more - or something else - than the original homeland? The study analyses the concept of home attachment in terms of transnationalism understood as affective ties (Huynh and Yiu 2012; Paraschivescu 2011). Based on evidence from interview data a typology of attachment to the home country is outlined and further discussed. The results point to the conclusion that the issue of attachment to the home country is discursively constructed by respondents both explicitly and implicitly by multiple references to the family migration project and their immigrant status at destination. Moreover, I argue that the different types of attachment identified in the interviewees’ discourses are mediated by the subjective assessment of the integration experience into the host country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83295,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Urban & social change review\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"27 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Urban & social change review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2015-0007\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Urban & social change review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/scr-2015-0007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
摘要:通过对罗马尼亚东南部一个村庄(弗朗切亚县Vulturu)进行的一项大型定性研究的访谈进行分析,本文探讨了出生在原籍国但移民到意大利或所谓的1.5代(Rumbaut 2002;2012年)谈论他们与祖国的关系。换句话说,罗马尼亚是否比它原来的祖国更像——或者更像别的什么?该研究从跨国主义的角度分析了被理解为情感纽带的家依恋概念(Huynh and Yiu 2012;Paraschivescu 2011)。根据访谈数据的证据,概述并进一步讨论了对祖国依恋的类型。结果表明,对祖国的依恋问题是由受访者通过多次提及家庭移民项目和他们在目的地的移民身份而明确或隐含地话语构建的。此外,我认为,在受访者的话语中发现的不同类型的依恋是由对融入东道国经验的主观评估所介导的。
Children of Romanian Migrants between “Here” and “There”: Stories of Home Attachment
Abstract By analysing interviews from a larger qualitative study conducted in a Romanian village (Vulturu, Vrancea County) from the South-East region of the country, this paper explores the ways Romanian migrants’ children who were born in the country of origin but migrated to Italy or the so-called 1.5 Generation (Rumbaut 2002; 2012) talk about their ties with the home country. In other words, is Romania presented as more - or something else - than the original homeland? The study analyses the concept of home attachment in terms of transnationalism understood as affective ties (Huynh and Yiu 2012; Paraschivescu 2011). Based on evidence from interview data a typology of attachment to the home country is outlined and further discussed. The results point to the conclusion that the issue of attachment to the home country is discursively constructed by respondents both explicitly and implicitly by multiple references to the family migration project and their immigrant status at destination. Moreover, I argue that the different types of attachment identified in the interviewees’ discourses are mediated by the subjective assessment of the integration experience into the host country.