{"title":"重新审视晚期早产儿和早期足月婴儿使用产前皮质类固醇:一项观察性分析研究","authors":"Shiny Rugmini, Femitha Pournami, A. Prithvi, Anand Nandakumar, Jyothi Prabhakar, Naveen Jain","doi":"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_75_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Guidelines from prominent policymakers on the use of antenatal steroids (ANS) in “late preterm deliveries and early term casearian deliveries” (LET) are nonuniform. This descriptive study compared LET infants born during two-time epochs: Retrospective: ANS exposed (ANSE) (when institute practice was to administer ANS to all LET mothers), and prospective – ANS unexposed (ANSU) (after the policy was revised in May 2021). Methodology: All antenatal mothers of anticipated late-preterm and early-term cesarean deliveries were being administered ANS before May 2021. Following the revision of hospital policy, this practice was discontinued. Comparative analysis for respiratory morbidity (RM) and other clinically relevant outcomes were conducted in infants born during two-time epochs (ANSE vs. ANSU). Results: Among 379 included infants, those with RMs were comparable between groups: 33 (17.5%) in ANSE; 31 (16.4%) in ANSU – Odds ratio (OR) 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.61–1.92), P = 0.78. No difference was noted in hypoglycemia events: 23 (12.2%) in ANSE; 22 (11.6%) in ANSU, OR = 1.05 95% CI (0.56–1.96), P = 0.87. Conclusion: ANS in LET did not seem to reduce the risk of RM. It may be appropriate to audit individual unit practices and relevant outcomes before blanket recommendations are made.","PeriodicalId":32638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","volume":"18 1","pages":"24 - 28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the use of antenatal corticosteroids for late preterm and early term infants: An observational analytical study\",\"authors\":\"Shiny Rugmini, Femitha Pournami, A. Prithvi, Anand Nandakumar, Jyothi Prabhakar, Naveen Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_75_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Guidelines from prominent policymakers on the use of antenatal steroids (ANS) in “late preterm deliveries and early term casearian deliveries” (LET) are nonuniform. This descriptive study compared LET infants born during two-time epochs: Retrospective: ANS exposed (ANSE) (when institute practice was to administer ANS to all LET mothers), and prospective – ANS unexposed (ANSU) (after the policy was revised in May 2021). Methodology: All antenatal mothers of anticipated late-preterm and early-term cesarean deliveries were being administered ANS before May 2021. Following the revision of hospital policy, this practice was discontinued. Comparative analysis for respiratory morbidity (RM) and other clinically relevant outcomes were conducted in infants born during two-time epochs (ANSE vs. ANSU). Results: Among 379 included infants, those with RMs were comparable between groups: 33 (17.5%) in ANSE; 31 (16.4%) in ANSU – Odds ratio (OR) 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.61–1.92), P = 0.78. No difference was noted in hypoglycemia events: 23 (12.2%) in ANSE; 22 (11.6%) in ANSU, OR = 1.05 95% CI (0.56–1.96), P = 0.87. Conclusion: ANS in LET did not seem to reduce the risk of RM. It may be appropriate to audit individual unit practices and relevant outcomes before blanket recommendations are made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"24 - 28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_75_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_75_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:著名政策制定者关于在“晚期早产和早期剖宫产”(LET)中使用产前类固醇(ANS)的指导方针并不统一。本描述性研究比较了在两个时期出生的LET婴儿:回顾性:ANS暴露(ANSE)(研究所的做法是对所有LET母亲进行ANS治疗)和前瞻性- ANS未暴露(ANSU)(在2021年5月政策修订后)。方法:所有预期晚期早产和早期剖宫产的产前母亲在2021年5月之前接受了ANS。在医院政策修订后,这种做法停止了。比较分析两期出生婴儿的呼吸系统发病率(RM)和其他临床相关结局(ANSE与ANSU)。结果:在379例纳入的婴儿中,RMs组间具有可比性:ANSE组33例(17.5%);anu 31例(16.4%)-优势比(OR) 1.08;95%置信区间(CI) (0.61-1.92), P = 0.78。在低血糖事件方面没有差异:ANSE患者23例(12.2%);22例(11.6%),OR = 1.05 95% CI (0.56 ~ 1.96), P = 0.87。结论:LET中的ANS似乎并没有降低RM的风险。在提出全面建议之前,审计个别单位的做法和相关结果可能是适当的。
Revisiting the use of antenatal corticosteroids for late preterm and early term infants: An observational analytical study
Background: Guidelines from prominent policymakers on the use of antenatal steroids (ANS) in “late preterm deliveries and early term casearian deliveries” (LET) are nonuniform. This descriptive study compared LET infants born during two-time epochs: Retrospective: ANS exposed (ANSE) (when institute practice was to administer ANS to all LET mothers), and prospective – ANS unexposed (ANSU) (after the policy was revised in May 2021). Methodology: All antenatal mothers of anticipated late-preterm and early-term cesarean deliveries were being administered ANS before May 2021. Following the revision of hospital policy, this practice was discontinued. Comparative analysis for respiratory morbidity (RM) and other clinically relevant outcomes were conducted in infants born during two-time epochs (ANSE vs. ANSU). Results: Among 379 included infants, those with RMs were comparable between groups: 33 (17.5%) in ANSE; 31 (16.4%) in ANSU – Odds ratio (OR) 1.08; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.61–1.92), P = 0.78. No difference was noted in hypoglycemia events: 23 (12.2%) in ANSE; 22 (11.6%) in ANSU, OR = 1.05 95% CI (0.56–1.96), P = 0.87. Conclusion: ANS in LET did not seem to reduce the risk of RM. It may be appropriate to audit individual unit practices and relevant outcomes before blanket recommendations are made.