{"title":"泰坦之战:国家所有付款人索赔报告系统满足ERISA优先权。","authors":"S. Rosenbaum","doi":"10.1111/1468-0009.12160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During its term that begins in October 2015, the United States Supreme Court will hear Gobeille v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a case that will test whether self-insuring employers can refuse to comply with state all-payer claims reporting laws. Without a uniform, nationwide strategy to comprehensively address health care costs and quality—notably absent from the Affordable Care Act (ACA)—the stakes could not be greater for states that seek to take action.","PeriodicalId":78777,"journal":{"name":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","volume":"11 1","pages":"683-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clash of the Titans: State All-Payer Claims Reporting Systems Meet ERISA Preemption.\",\"authors\":\"S. Rosenbaum\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1468-0009.12160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During its term that begins in October 2015, the United States Supreme Court will hear Gobeille v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a case that will test whether self-insuring employers can refuse to comply with state all-payer claims reporting laws. Without a uniform, nationwide strategy to comprehensively address health care costs and quality—notably absent from the Affordable Care Act (ACA)—the stakes could not be greater for states that seek to take action.\",\"PeriodicalId\":78777,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"683-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12160\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Milbank Memorial Fund quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0009.12160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在2015年10月开始的任期内，美国最高法院将审理戈贝尔诉利宝互助保险公司(Gobeille v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company)一案，该案将检验自行投保的雇主是否可以拒绝遵守州的全付款人索赔报告法。如果没有一个统一的、全国性的战略来全面解决医疗保健成本和质量问题——这一点在《平价医疗法案》(ACA)中是不存在的——那么寻求采取行动的各州所面临的风险就不会更大。
Clash of the Titans: State All-Payer Claims Reporting Systems Meet ERISA Preemption.
During its term that begins in October 2015, the United States Supreme Court will hear Gobeille v Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, a case that will test whether self-insuring employers can refuse to comply with state all-payer claims reporting laws. Without a uniform, nationwide strategy to comprehensively address health care costs and quality—notably absent from the Affordable Care Act (ACA)—the stakes could not be greater for states that seek to take action.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
