不同皮肤消毒剂对免疫缺陷患者中心静脉导管消毒效果的比较

Wei-Qiong Hu, Xiujuan Guo, Yan Song, Xiaodong Xu, Ting Wang, Yanchao Cao, Xia Yan
{"title":"不同皮肤消毒剂对免疫缺陷患者中心静脉导管消毒效果的比较","authors":"Wei-Qiong Hu, Xiujuan Guo, Yan Song, Xiaodong Xu, Ting Wang, Yanchao Cao, Xia Yan","doi":"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.08.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective \nTo compare the effect of the 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfectant and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant on the maintenance of central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with immunodeficiency. \n \n \nMethods \nThe patients were randomly divided into two groups. 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfectant was used in the experimental group, and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant was used in the control group. The CVC was sterilized once a week and continuously maintained for 3 weeks. According to the condition of catheter, the dressing was changed in time in case of any problem,and the reason and time for the catheter nursing care were recorded. The duration of changing the catheter dressing in different disinfectant, incidence rate of dressings looseness and incidence of catheter-related infections in two groups were analyzed. \n \n \nResults \nThe duration of skin drying and duration of caring in the experimental group were (0.62±0.10)min, (11.67±0.33) min, significantly shorter than the control group [(1.97±0.18) min, (14.48±0.33) min](t values were 63.044, 57.296, P 0.05). \n \n \nConclusions \nBoth 2% chlorhexidinegluconate and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant have similar disinfection effect on CVC caring, but 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfection is more efficient and worthy of application in clinical settings. \n \n \nKey words: \nChlorhexidinegluconate; Iodophor; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Central venous catheter","PeriodicalId":22999,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of practical nursing","volume":"12 1","pages":"579-582"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of the disinfection effects of different skin disinfectants on central venous catheter in immune-deficient patients\",\"authors\":\"Wei-Qiong Hu, Xiujuan Guo, Yan Song, Xiaodong Xu, Ting Wang, Yanchao Cao, Xia Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.08.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective \\nTo compare the effect of the 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfectant and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant on the maintenance of central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with immunodeficiency. \\n \\n \\nMethods \\nThe patients were randomly divided into two groups. 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfectant was used in the experimental group, and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant was used in the control group. The CVC was sterilized once a week and continuously maintained for 3 weeks. According to the condition of catheter, the dressing was changed in time in case of any problem,and the reason and time for the catheter nursing care were recorded. The duration of changing the catheter dressing in different disinfectant, incidence rate of dressings looseness and incidence of catheter-related infections in two groups were analyzed. \\n \\n \\nResults \\nThe duration of skin drying and duration of caring in the experimental group were (0.62±0.10)min, (11.67±0.33) min, significantly shorter than the control group [(1.97±0.18) min, (14.48±0.33) min](t values were 63.044, 57.296, P 0.05). \\n \\n \\nConclusions \\nBoth 2% chlorhexidinegluconate and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant have similar disinfection effect on CVC caring, but 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfection is more efficient and worthy of application in clinical settings. \\n \\n \\nKey words: \\nChlorhexidinegluconate; Iodophor; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Central venous catheter\",\"PeriodicalId\":22999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of practical nursing\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"579-582\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of practical nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.08.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of practical nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3760/CMA.J.ISSN.1672-7088.2020.08.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较2%氯己定葡萄糖酸盐消毒剂与0.5%碘伏消毒剂对免疫缺陷患者中心静脉导管(CVC)维持的效果。方法随机分为两组。试验组采用2%氯己定葡酸盐消毒剂,对照组采用0.5%碘伏消毒剂。CVC每周消毒1次,连续维持3周。根据导管情况,如有问题及时更换敷料,并记录导管护理的原因和时间。分析两组患者在不同消毒剂下更换导管敷料的时间、敷料松动的发生率和导管相关感染的发生率。结果实验组皮肤干燥时间为(0.62±0.10)min,护理时间为(11.67±0.33)min,显著短于对照组[(1.97±0.18)min,(14.48±0.33)min](t值分别为63.044,57.296,P < 0.05)。结论2%葡萄球菌酸氯己定与0.5%碘伏消毒剂对CVC护理的消毒效果相似,但2%葡萄球菌酸氯己定消毒效果更好,值得临床推广应用。关键词:葡萄糖酸氯己定;碘载体;造血干细胞移植;中心静脉导管
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of the disinfection effects of different skin disinfectants on central venous catheter in immune-deficient patients
Objective To compare the effect of the 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfectant and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant on the maintenance of central venous catheter (CVC) in patients with immunodeficiency. Methods The patients were randomly divided into two groups. 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfectant was used in the experimental group, and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant was used in the control group. The CVC was sterilized once a week and continuously maintained for 3 weeks. According to the condition of catheter, the dressing was changed in time in case of any problem,and the reason and time for the catheter nursing care were recorded. The duration of changing the catheter dressing in different disinfectant, incidence rate of dressings looseness and incidence of catheter-related infections in two groups were analyzed. Results The duration of skin drying and duration of caring in the experimental group were (0.62±0.10)min, (11.67±0.33) min, significantly shorter than the control group [(1.97±0.18) min, (14.48±0.33) min](t values were 63.044, 57.296, P 0.05). Conclusions Both 2% chlorhexidinegluconate and 0.5% iodophor disinfectant have similar disinfection effect on CVC caring, but 2% chlorhexidinegluconate disinfection is more efficient and worthy of application in clinical settings. Key words: Chlorhexidinegluconate; Iodophor; Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; Central venous catheter
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信