破产风险评价模型的文献计量分析

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT
V. Grosu, Ancuța Chelba, Anatol Melega, Daniel Botez, M. Socoliuc
{"title":"破产风险评价模型的文献计量分析","authors":"V. Grosu, Ancuța Chelba, Anatol Melega, Daniel Botez, M. Socoliuc","doi":"10.5937/straman2200035g","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To manage an enterprise effectively, it is necessary to analyze and diagnose its financial condition, an activity that can warn management of dangerous business situations. Topics such as assessing financial position, performance, and risk, especially after situations that involve an economic and financial crisis in the company have been widely discussed in scientific literature. Purpose: The purpose of the research is to highlight the main research trends regarding bankruptcy risk assessment models. Study design/methodology/approach: The research strategy is based on two main directions: the first involves the selection of research papers with topics on Conan & Holder and Taffler models published on WoS between 2007 and 2021 and those published on SCOPUS between 2006 and 2021. The second direction aims to select the relevant papers and perform a content analysis of financial-accounting information of Conan & Holder and Taffler models. Findings/conclusions: The results obtained were concretized in the design of a bibliometric analysis of bankruptcy risk assessment models, which provides an overview of the new research trends regarding bankruptcy risk assessment models. Thus, it was found that most of the studies focus on the analysis of the efficiency of the bankruptcy risk assessment methods and the identification of new options that allow predictability of the risk. Limitations/future research: Our study limitations are mainly due to the bibliometric algorithm, in the sense that only papers indexed in WoS and Scopus can be imported, processed, and interpreted, which excludes parts of the existing literature on this topic and omits the analysis of some pertinent contributions to our research area. This research can be used as a cornerstone for new research directions, both quantitative and qualitative, on the mechanism of application of bankruptcy risk prevention methods.","PeriodicalId":43778,"journal":{"name":"Strategic Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bibliometric analysis of the literature on evaluation models of the bankruptcy risk\",\"authors\":\"V. Grosu, Ancuța Chelba, Anatol Melega, Daniel Botez, M. Socoliuc\",\"doi\":\"10.5937/straman2200035g\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To manage an enterprise effectively, it is necessary to analyze and diagnose its financial condition, an activity that can warn management of dangerous business situations. Topics such as assessing financial position, performance, and risk, especially after situations that involve an economic and financial crisis in the company have been widely discussed in scientific literature. Purpose: The purpose of the research is to highlight the main research trends regarding bankruptcy risk assessment models. Study design/methodology/approach: The research strategy is based on two main directions: the first involves the selection of research papers with topics on Conan & Holder and Taffler models published on WoS between 2007 and 2021 and those published on SCOPUS between 2006 and 2021. The second direction aims to select the relevant papers and perform a content analysis of financial-accounting information of Conan & Holder and Taffler models. Findings/conclusions: The results obtained were concretized in the design of a bibliometric analysis of bankruptcy risk assessment models, which provides an overview of the new research trends regarding bankruptcy risk assessment models. Thus, it was found that most of the studies focus on the analysis of the efficiency of the bankruptcy risk assessment methods and the identification of new options that allow predictability of the risk. Limitations/future research: Our study limitations are mainly due to the bibliometric algorithm, in the sense that only papers indexed in WoS and Scopus can be imported, processed, and interpreted, which excludes parts of the existing literature on this topic and omits the analysis of some pertinent contributions to our research area. This research can be used as a cornerstone for new research directions, both quantitative and qualitative, on the mechanism of application of bankruptcy risk prevention methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43778,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strategic Management\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strategic Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5937/straman2200035g\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strategic Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/straman2200035g","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:为了有效地管理企业,有必要对企业的财务状况进行分析和诊断,这是一项可以警告管理层危险经营状况的活动。诸如评估财务状况、业绩和风险等主题,特别是在公司发生经济和金融危机之后,已经在科学文献中得到了广泛的讨论。目的:研究的目的是为了突出破产风险评估模型的主要研究趋势。研究设计/方法/方法:研究策略基于两个主要方向:第一个涉及选择2007年至2021年在WoS上发表的关于Conan & Holder和Taffler模型的研究论文,以及2006年至2021年在SCOPUS上发表的研究论文。第二个方向是选择相关论文,对Conan & Holder模型和Taffler模型的财务会计信息进行内容分析。研究结果/结论:将所得结果具体化到破产风险评估模型的文献计量分析设计中,概述了破产风险评估模型的新研究趋势。因此,我们发现,大多数研究都集中在分析破产风险评估方法的效率和识别允许风险可预测性的新选项上。局限性/未来研究:我们研究的局限性主要是由于文献计量算法的原因,即只有在WoS和Scopus中被索引的论文才能被导入、处理和解释,这就排除了部分关于该主题的现有文献,并且忽略了对我们研究领域的一些相关贡献的分析。本研究可作为定量和定性研究破产风险防范方法应用机制新方向的基石。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bibliometric analysis of the literature on evaluation models of the bankruptcy risk
Background: To manage an enterprise effectively, it is necessary to analyze and diagnose its financial condition, an activity that can warn management of dangerous business situations. Topics such as assessing financial position, performance, and risk, especially after situations that involve an economic and financial crisis in the company have been widely discussed in scientific literature. Purpose: The purpose of the research is to highlight the main research trends regarding bankruptcy risk assessment models. Study design/methodology/approach: The research strategy is based on two main directions: the first involves the selection of research papers with topics on Conan & Holder and Taffler models published on WoS between 2007 and 2021 and those published on SCOPUS between 2006 and 2021. The second direction aims to select the relevant papers and perform a content analysis of financial-accounting information of Conan & Holder and Taffler models. Findings/conclusions: The results obtained were concretized in the design of a bibliometric analysis of bankruptcy risk assessment models, which provides an overview of the new research trends regarding bankruptcy risk assessment models. Thus, it was found that most of the studies focus on the analysis of the efficiency of the bankruptcy risk assessment methods and the identification of new options that allow predictability of the risk. Limitations/future research: Our study limitations are mainly due to the bibliometric algorithm, in the sense that only papers indexed in WoS and Scopus can be imported, processed, and interpreted, which excludes parts of the existing literature on this topic and omits the analysis of some pertinent contributions to our research area. This research can be used as a cornerstone for new research directions, both quantitative and qualitative, on the mechanism of application of bankruptcy risk prevention methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Strategic Management
Strategic Management MANAGEMENT-
自引率
8.30%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信