{"title":"性与奴隶社会。","authors":"S. Brown","doi":"10.2307/274880","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CINCE WORLD WAR II, and especially during the past two decades, historians of United States slavery have begun to examine the role of blacks within the slave environment. Scholars previously concentrated upon whites and concerned themselves with such questions as the profitability of the institution, the hegemony of the white South, the role that slavery played in the conflict between the North and the South, and the careers and attitudes of white abolitionists. But during the past twenty years, as societal conflicts and the civil rights movement became increasingly prominent, the focus of concern broadened. Researchers have been inspired to investigate the actions and reactions of slaves. The current generation of historians recognizes that blacks, as well as whites, significantly contributed to slave culture and they are now subjecting slaves and slave society to extensive analysis.1 Two decades ago, Stanley Elkins published Slavery: A Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life, a contribution to the study of slavery that heralded a new era in the slavery debate. Elkins introduced ideas concerning blacks that have been criticized extensively and refined. One of the most influential of Elkins' beliefs was that under the conditions of North American slavery, slaves were effectively stripped of an active personality, and that they passively endured the rigors of their status that is, slaves fulfilled the stereotyped Sambo image of docile beings acting only under orders from their masters.2 Historians intent upon revising Elkins' conclusion, for a number of motives, have indicated that slaves not only retained personality initiative, but that they were able to endure the vicissitudes of slavery pre-","PeriodicalId":82317,"journal":{"name":"Phylon (1960)","volume":"6 1","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1981-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sexuality and the slave community.\",\"authors\":\"S. Brown\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/274880\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"CINCE WORLD WAR II, and especially during the past two decades, historians of United States slavery have begun to examine the role of blacks within the slave environment. Scholars previously concentrated upon whites and concerned themselves with such questions as the profitability of the institution, the hegemony of the white South, the role that slavery played in the conflict between the North and the South, and the careers and attitudes of white abolitionists. But during the past twenty years, as societal conflicts and the civil rights movement became increasingly prominent, the focus of concern broadened. Researchers have been inspired to investigate the actions and reactions of slaves. The current generation of historians recognizes that blacks, as well as whites, significantly contributed to slave culture and they are now subjecting slaves and slave society to extensive analysis.1 Two decades ago, Stanley Elkins published Slavery: A Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life, a contribution to the study of slavery that heralded a new era in the slavery debate. Elkins introduced ideas concerning blacks that have been criticized extensively and refined. One of the most influential of Elkins' beliefs was that under the conditions of North American slavery, slaves were effectively stripped of an active personality, and that they passively endured the rigors of their status that is, slaves fulfilled the stereotyped Sambo image of docile beings acting only under orders from their masters.2 Historians intent upon revising Elkins' conclusion, for a number of motives, have indicated that slaves not only retained personality initiative, but that they were able to endure the vicissitudes of slavery pre-\",\"PeriodicalId\":82317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phylon (1960)\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"1-10\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1981-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phylon (1960)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/274880\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phylon (1960)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/274880","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4
摘要
自第二次世界大战以来,特别是在过去的二十年中,研究美国奴隶制的历史学家开始研究黑人在奴隶制环境中的作用。学者们以前把注意力集中在白人身上,关心的问题包括制度的盈利能力、南方白人的霸权、奴隶制在南北冲突中扮演的角色、白人废奴主义者的职业和态度。但在过去的二十年里,随着社会矛盾和民权运动的日益突出,关注的焦点扩大了。研究人员受到启发,开始调查奴隶的行为和反应。当代历史学家认识到,黑人和白人一样,对奴隶文化做出了重大贡献,他们现在正在对奴隶和奴隶社会进行广泛的分析20年前,斯坦利·埃尔金斯(Stanley Elkins)出版了《奴隶制:美国制度和知识分子生活中的一个问题》(Slavery: A Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life),这是对奴隶制研究的贡献,预示着奴隶制辩论进入了一个新时代。埃尔金斯介绍了一些关于黑人的观点,这些观点受到了广泛的批评和完善。埃尔金斯最具影响力的信仰之一是,在北美奴隶制的条件下,奴隶们实际上被剥夺了积极的个性,他们被动地忍受着他们地位的严酷,也就是说,奴隶们满足了Sambo的刻板印象,即只有在主人的命令下才行动的温顺生物出于一些动机,历史学家们打算修改埃尔金斯的结论,他们指出,奴隶不仅保留了个性的主动性,而且他们能够忍受奴隶制之前的沧桑
CINCE WORLD WAR II, and especially during the past two decades, historians of United States slavery have begun to examine the role of blacks within the slave environment. Scholars previously concentrated upon whites and concerned themselves with such questions as the profitability of the institution, the hegemony of the white South, the role that slavery played in the conflict between the North and the South, and the careers and attitudes of white abolitionists. But during the past twenty years, as societal conflicts and the civil rights movement became increasingly prominent, the focus of concern broadened. Researchers have been inspired to investigate the actions and reactions of slaves. The current generation of historians recognizes that blacks, as well as whites, significantly contributed to slave culture and they are now subjecting slaves and slave society to extensive analysis.1 Two decades ago, Stanley Elkins published Slavery: A Problem in American Institutional and Intellectual Life, a contribution to the study of slavery that heralded a new era in the slavery debate. Elkins introduced ideas concerning blacks that have been criticized extensively and refined. One of the most influential of Elkins' beliefs was that under the conditions of North American slavery, slaves were effectively stripped of an active personality, and that they passively endured the rigors of their status that is, slaves fulfilled the stereotyped Sambo image of docile beings acting only under orders from their masters.2 Historians intent upon revising Elkins' conclusion, for a number of motives, have indicated that slaves not only retained personality initiative, but that they were able to endure the vicissitudes of slavery pre-