政府规模和经济自由是经济增长的决定因素:基于传统基金会数据的证据

Q2 Social Sciences
E. Merza
{"title":"政府规模和经济自由是经济增长的决定因素:基于传统基金会数据的证据","authors":"E. Merza","doi":"10.18488/73.v11i2.3314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this paper was to find out if government size is detrimental to economic growth as it is often claimed. This issue was investigated by using extreme bounds analysis to overcome the problem of model uncertainty and the sensitivity of the results to the selected set of explanatory variables. By also using non-nested model selection tests as applied to data obtained from the Heritage Foundation (an American conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. that is primarily geared toward public policy), cross-sectional evidence was presented in support of the proposition that government size is detrimental to economic growth. In particular, government spending turns out to be the most important determinant of economic growth, dominating the rule of law, regulatory efficiency and market openness. Two caveats must be borne in mind when these results are interpreted: (i) what matters is the quality, not the quantity, of government spending; and (ii) a big government can be good for business. The results presented in this study provide further evidence on a controversial issue and some guidelines for policy makers concerned with economic growth.","PeriodicalId":36807,"journal":{"name":"Humanities and Social Sciences Letters","volume":"2005 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Government size and economic freedom as determinants of growth: Evidence based on the Heritage Foundation data\",\"authors\":\"E. Merza\",\"doi\":\"10.18488/73.v11i2.3314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this paper was to find out if government size is detrimental to economic growth as it is often claimed. This issue was investigated by using extreme bounds analysis to overcome the problem of model uncertainty and the sensitivity of the results to the selected set of explanatory variables. By also using non-nested model selection tests as applied to data obtained from the Heritage Foundation (an American conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. that is primarily geared toward public policy), cross-sectional evidence was presented in support of the proposition that government size is detrimental to economic growth. In particular, government spending turns out to be the most important determinant of economic growth, dominating the rule of law, regulatory efficiency and market openness. Two caveats must be borne in mind when these results are interpreted: (i) what matters is the quality, not the quantity, of government spending; and (ii) a big government can be good for business. The results presented in this study provide further evidence on a controversial issue and some guidelines for policy makers concerned with economic growth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36807,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Humanities and Social Sciences Letters\",\"volume\":\"2005 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Humanities and Social Sciences Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v11i2.3314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Humanities and Social Sciences Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18488/73.v11i2.3314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是找出政府规模是否像人们常说的那样不利于经济增长。利用极值界分析来克服模型不确定性和结果对所选解释变量集的敏感性问题。通过将非嵌套模型选择测试应用于从传统基金会(一个位于华盛顿特区的主要面向公共政策的美国保守派智库)获得的数据,提出了横截面证据,以支持政府规模不利于经济增长的主张。特别是,政府支出成为经济增长最重要的决定因素,主导着法治、监管效率和市场开放。在解释这些结果时,必须牢记两点:(1)重要的是政府支出的质量,而不是数量;(二)大政府对企业有利。本研究的结果为一个有争议的问题提供了进一步的证据,并为关注经济增长的政策制定者提供了一些指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Government size and economic freedom as determinants of growth: Evidence based on the Heritage Foundation data
The objective of this paper was to find out if government size is detrimental to economic growth as it is often claimed. This issue was investigated by using extreme bounds analysis to overcome the problem of model uncertainty and the sensitivity of the results to the selected set of explanatory variables. By also using non-nested model selection tests as applied to data obtained from the Heritage Foundation (an American conservative think tank based in Washington, D.C. that is primarily geared toward public policy), cross-sectional evidence was presented in support of the proposition that government size is detrimental to economic growth. In particular, government spending turns out to be the most important determinant of economic growth, dominating the rule of law, regulatory efficiency and market openness. Two caveats must be borne in mind when these results are interpreted: (i) what matters is the quality, not the quantity, of government spending; and (ii) a big government can be good for business. The results presented in this study provide further evidence on a controversial issue and some guidelines for policy makers concerned with economic growth.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Humanities and Social Sciences Letters
Humanities and Social Sciences Letters Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信