{"title":"椰壳粗骨料自重自密实混凝土抗压强度与弹性模量的关系","authors":"K. Poongodi, P. Murthi","doi":"10.1080/13287982.2021.1926061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Aggregates are the fundamental ingredient for making concrete. The incremental demand for aggregates in concrete is affecting the environment due to excessive exploitation of natural rocks. In an effort to conserve the natural resources and minimise the adverse impacts of industrial by-products in the environment, it is essential to explore the suitable alternate materials for construction. Under such circumstances, an attempt was made with coconut shell aggregate (CSA) as a substitute for conventional coarse aggregate (CA) in self-compacting concrete (SCC). In this investigation, binary and ternary blended SCC were developed using the mineral admixtures such as rice husk ash (RHA) and silica fume (SF). Two series of SCC were designed with the total powder content of 450 and 550 kg/m3 , respectively, for investigation. The effects of CSA in SCC on fresh and hardened properties were studied and compared with the results obtained without CSA. The results revealed that use of 75% CSA in SCC reduced the density below the threshold level of structural lightweight concrete (1850 kg/m3) in dry state. The CSA-based lightweight self-compacting concrete (LWSCC) possesses good fluidity, deformability, passing ability and filling ability in its fresh state. The compressive strength and elastic modulus of LWSCC were determined and found that the results are decreased after the substitution of more than 75% of CSA. Further, the paper intended to predict an appropriate correlation between compressive strength and elastic modulus of CSA-based LWSCC.","PeriodicalId":45617,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Correlation between compressive strength and elastic modulus of light weight self-compacting concrete using coconut shell as coarse aggregate\",\"authors\":\"K. Poongodi, P. Murthi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13287982.2021.1926061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Aggregates are the fundamental ingredient for making concrete. The incremental demand for aggregates in concrete is affecting the environment due to excessive exploitation of natural rocks. In an effort to conserve the natural resources and minimise the adverse impacts of industrial by-products in the environment, it is essential to explore the suitable alternate materials for construction. Under such circumstances, an attempt was made with coconut shell aggregate (CSA) as a substitute for conventional coarse aggregate (CA) in self-compacting concrete (SCC). In this investigation, binary and ternary blended SCC were developed using the mineral admixtures such as rice husk ash (RHA) and silica fume (SF). Two series of SCC were designed with the total powder content of 450 and 550 kg/m3 , respectively, for investigation. The effects of CSA in SCC on fresh and hardened properties were studied and compared with the results obtained without CSA. The results revealed that use of 75% CSA in SCC reduced the density below the threshold level of structural lightweight concrete (1850 kg/m3) in dry state. The CSA-based lightweight self-compacting concrete (LWSCC) possesses good fluidity, deformability, passing ability and filling ability in its fresh state. The compressive strength and elastic modulus of LWSCC were determined and found that the results are decreased after the substitution of more than 75% of CSA. Further, the paper intended to predict an appropriate correlation between compressive strength and elastic modulus of CSA-based LWSCC.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.1926061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13287982.2021.1926061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Correlation between compressive strength and elastic modulus of light weight self-compacting concrete using coconut shell as coarse aggregate
ABSTRACT Aggregates are the fundamental ingredient for making concrete. The incremental demand for aggregates in concrete is affecting the environment due to excessive exploitation of natural rocks. In an effort to conserve the natural resources and minimise the adverse impacts of industrial by-products in the environment, it is essential to explore the suitable alternate materials for construction. Under such circumstances, an attempt was made with coconut shell aggregate (CSA) as a substitute for conventional coarse aggregate (CA) in self-compacting concrete (SCC). In this investigation, binary and ternary blended SCC were developed using the mineral admixtures such as rice husk ash (RHA) and silica fume (SF). Two series of SCC were designed with the total powder content of 450 and 550 kg/m3 , respectively, for investigation. The effects of CSA in SCC on fresh and hardened properties were studied and compared with the results obtained without CSA. The results revealed that use of 75% CSA in SCC reduced the density below the threshold level of structural lightweight concrete (1850 kg/m3) in dry state. The CSA-based lightweight self-compacting concrete (LWSCC) possesses good fluidity, deformability, passing ability and filling ability in its fresh state. The compressive strength and elastic modulus of LWSCC were determined and found that the results are decreased after the substitution of more than 75% of CSA. Further, the paper intended to predict an appropriate correlation between compressive strength and elastic modulus of CSA-based LWSCC.
期刊介绍:
The Australian Journal of Structural Engineering (AJSE) is published under the auspices of the Structural College Board of Engineers Australia. It fulfils part of the Board''s mission for Continuing Professional Development. The journal also offers a means for exchange and interaction of scientific and professional issues and technical developments. The journal is open to members and non-members of Engineers Australia. Original papers on research and development (Technical Papers) and professional matters and achievements (Professional Papers) in all areas relevant to the science, art and practice of structural engineering are considered for possible publication. All papers and technical notes are peer-reviewed. The fundamental criterion for acceptance for publication is the intellectual and professional value of the contribution. Occasionally, papers previously published in essentially the same form elsewhere may be considered for publication. In this case acknowledgement to prior publication must be included in a footnote on page one of the manuscript. These papers are peer-reviewed as new submissions. The length of acceptable contributions typically should not exceed 4,000 to 5,000 word equivalents. Longer manuscripts may be considered at the discretion of the Editor. Technical Notes typically should not exceed about 1,000 word equivalents. Discussions on a Paper or Note published in the AJSE are welcomed. Discussions must address significant matters related to the content of a Paper or Technical Note and may include supplementary and critical comments and questions regarding content.