肾移植受者尿路感染中产esbl微生物的临床特征和结果

J. Singh, Mikhail de Jesus, Leigh G. Cooper, Judith Pozzerle, S. Antony, B. Knight
{"title":"肾移植受者尿路感染中产esbl微生物的临床特征和结果","authors":"J. Singh, Mikhail de Jesus, Leigh G. Cooper, Judith Pozzerle, S. Antony, B. Knight","doi":"10.5812/iji.96442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": Multidrug-resistant organisms have become an increasing challenge in the management of both solid and non-solid organ transplants. This is especially true with extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. We performed a retrospective study of 62 renal transplant recipients at a tertiary care center in El Paso, Texas. In our study population, 43% of patients had a positive urine culture and were treated for a UTI. 30% of those UTIs were caused by an ESBL-producing organism. Of note, 43% of the patients who developed a UTI also had a recurrent episode. Notably, one patient had 25 recurrences of UTIs caused by ESBL producing E. coli. K. pneumoniae and E. coli were the most commonly cultured non-ESBL-producing bacteria (40.7%). E. coli was the most frequently cultured ESBL-producing bacteria (62.5%), while K. pneumoniae was the second most frequently cultured ESBL-producing bacteria (37.5%). There were three transplant rejections; two had ESBL UTIs and one had 11 recurrent UTIs prior to rejection. Diabetes, the length of ureteral stents, and higher troughs of immunosuppressant therapy were observed to be correlated with higher rates of UTIs in our patient population. Our findings are consistent with reports published in current literature regarding rates of UTIs among renal transplant recipients. Due to increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms and increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), it becomes imperative for clinicians to include CRE in the differential diagnosis when evaluating renal transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs. More importantly, CRE must be considered when evaluating renal transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs caused by ESBL producing organisms.","PeriodicalId":13989,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Infection","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Features and Outcomes in ESBL-Producing Microorganisms in Renal Transplant Recipients with Urinary Tract Infections\",\"authors\":\"J. Singh, Mikhail de Jesus, Leigh G. Cooper, Judith Pozzerle, S. Antony, B. Knight\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/iji.96442\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": Multidrug-resistant organisms have become an increasing challenge in the management of both solid and non-solid organ transplants. This is especially true with extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. We performed a retrospective study of 62 renal transplant recipients at a tertiary care center in El Paso, Texas. In our study population, 43% of patients had a positive urine culture and were treated for a UTI. 30% of those UTIs were caused by an ESBL-producing organism. Of note, 43% of the patients who developed a UTI also had a recurrent episode. Notably, one patient had 25 recurrences of UTIs caused by ESBL producing E. coli. K. pneumoniae and E. coli were the most commonly cultured non-ESBL-producing bacteria (40.7%). E. coli was the most frequently cultured ESBL-producing bacteria (62.5%), while K. pneumoniae was the second most frequently cultured ESBL-producing bacteria (37.5%). There were three transplant rejections; two had ESBL UTIs and one had 11 recurrent UTIs prior to rejection. Diabetes, the length of ureteral stents, and higher troughs of immunosuppressant therapy were observed to be correlated with higher rates of UTIs in our patient population. Our findings are consistent with reports published in current literature regarding rates of UTIs among renal transplant recipients. Due to increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms and increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), it becomes imperative for clinicians to include CRE in the differential diagnosis when evaluating renal transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs. More importantly, CRE must be considered when evaluating renal transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs caused by ESBL producing organisms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Infection\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Infection\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/iji.96442\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Infection","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/iji.96442","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

耐多药生物已成为实体和非实体器官移植管理中日益严峻的挑战。对于广谱β -内酰胺酶(ESBL)和碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)感染尤其如此。我们对德克萨斯州埃尔帕索一家三级保健中心的62名肾移植受者进行了回顾性研究。在我们的研究人群中,43%的患者尿培养呈阳性,并接受了尿路感染治疗。30%的尿路感染是由产生esbl的生物体引起的。值得注意的是,43%的尿路感染患者也有复发。值得注意的是,一名患者有25次由产生ESBL的大肠杆菌引起的尿路感染复发。肺炎克雷伯菌和大肠杆菌是最常见的非产esbl细菌(40.7%)。大肠杆菌是最常见的esbl产生菌(62.5%),肺炎克雷伯菌是第二常见的esbl产生菌(37.5%)。有三例移植排斥;2例有ESBL尿路感染,1例有11例复发性尿路感染。在我们的患者群体中,糖尿病、输尿管支架的长度和较高的免疫抑制剂治疗波谷被观察到与较高的尿路感染发生率相关。我们的发现与当前文献中关于肾移植受者尿路感染发生率的报道一致。由于多药耐药菌和碳青霉烯耐药肠杆菌科(CRE)的日益流行,临床医生在评估肾移植受者复发性尿路感染时,将CRE纳入鉴别诊断变得势在必行。更重要的是,在评估肾移植受者由产生ESBL的生物体引起的复发性尿路感染时,必须考虑CRE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical Features and Outcomes in ESBL-Producing Microorganisms in Renal Transplant Recipients with Urinary Tract Infections
: Multidrug-resistant organisms have become an increasing challenge in the management of both solid and non-solid organ transplants. This is especially true with extended spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) and carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections. We performed a retrospective study of 62 renal transplant recipients at a tertiary care center in El Paso, Texas. In our study population, 43% of patients had a positive urine culture and were treated for a UTI. 30% of those UTIs were caused by an ESBL-producing organism. Of note, 43% of the patients who developed a UTI also had a recurrent episode. Notably, one patient had 25 recurrences of UTIs caused by ESBL producing E. coli. K. pneumoniae and E. coli were the most commonly cultured non-ESBL-producing bacteria (40.7%). E. coli was the most frequently cultured ESBL-producing bacteria (62.5%), while K. pneumoniae was the second most frequently cultured ESBL-producing bacteria (37.5%). There were three transplant rejections; two had ESBL UTIs and one had 11 recurrent UTIs prior to rejection. Diabetes, the length of ureteral stents, and higher troughs of immunosuppressant therapy were observed to be correlated with higher rates of UTIs in our patient population. Our findings are consistent with reports published in current literature regarding rates of UTIs among renal transplant recipients. Due to increasing prevalence of multi-drug resistant organisms and increasing prevalence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), it becomes imperative for clinicians to include CRE in the differential diagnosis when evaluating renal transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs. More importantly, CRE must be considered when evaluating renal transplant recipients with recurrent UTIs caused by ESBL producing organisms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信