问题、干预、评价(PIE)培训对伊朗哈马丹医学院学生护理文献质量的影响

Q4 Social Sciences
S. Almasi, F. Cheraghi, M. Dehghani, S. Ehsani, A. Khalili, N. Alimohammadi
{"title":"问题、干预、评价(PIE)培训对伊朗哈马丹医学院学生护理文献质量的影响","authors":"S. Almasi, F. Cheraghi, M. Dehghani, S. Ehsani, A. Khalili, N. Alimohammadi","doi":"10.5812/SDME.65204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Documentation of nursing care is one of the most important professional responsibilities of nurses and one of the major components of medical care and patient record documentation. Objectives: The present study was performed to determine the effect of problem, intervention, evaluation (PIE) training on the quality of nursing students’ documentation. Methods: In this semi-experimental single-group study with a pretest-posttest design, a total of 28 nursing students were selected by simple random sampling. The data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, PIE documentation form, and documentation quality checklist. First, the students were asked to write two reports using the traditional or narrative method. Then, a training workshop was organized about PIE documentation, and the students were asked to use this method and write two more reports about the same patient on two consecutive days; overall, each student presented four reports. A total of 112 reports were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t test in SPSS. Results: Basedontheresultsof paired t test,therewasasignificantdifferenceinthemeanscoreof documentationqualitybetween the pretest and posttest (P < 0.001). Also, there was a significant difference in the mean score of documentation quality between the pretest and posttest in terms of both report structure and content (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Useof PIEreportingsystemimprovesthequalityof nursingdocumentation. Therefore,itcanbeasuitablealternative for the current narrative or traditional method.","PeriodicalId":34340,"journal":{"name":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Problem, Intervention, Evaluation (PIE) training on the Quality of Nursing Documentation Among Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran\",\"authors\":\"S. Almasi, F. Cheraghi, M. Dehghani, S. Ehsani, A. Khalili, N. Alimohammadi\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/SDME.65204\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Documentation of nursing care is one of the most important professional responsibilities of nurses and one of the major components of medical care and patient record documentation. Objectives: The present study was performed to determine the effect of problem, intervention, evaluation (PIE) training on the quality of nursing students’ documentation. Methods: In this semi-experimental single-group study with a pretest-posttest design, a total of 28 nursing students were selected by simple random sampling. The data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, PIE documentation form, and documentation quality checklist. First, the students were asked to write two reports using the traditional or narrative method. Then, a training workshop was organized about PIE documentation, and the students were asked to use this method and write two more reports about the same patient on two consecutive days; overall, each student presented four reports. A total of 112 reports were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t test in SPSS. Results: Basedontheresultsof paired t test,therewasasignificantdifferenceinthemeanscoreof documentationqualitybetween the pretest and posttest (P < 0.001). Also, there was a significant difference in the mean score of documentation quality between the pretest and posttest in terms of both report structure and content (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Useof PIEreportingsystemimprovesthequalityof nursingdocumentation. Therefore,itcanbeasuitablealternative for the current narrative or traditional method.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Strides in Development of Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Strides in Development of Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/SDME.65204\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Strides in Development of Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/SDME.65204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:护理记录是护士最重要的职业职责之一,也是医疗护理和病案记录的重要组成部分之一。目的:探讨问题、干预、评价(PIE)训练对护生档案质量的影响。方法:采用前测后测设计的半实验单组研究,采用简单随机抽样的方法抽取28名护生。数据收集工具包括人口统计问卷、PIE文档表单和文档质量检查表。首先,学生们被要求用传统的或叙述的方法写两篇报告。然后,组织了一个关于PIE文档的培训工作坊,要求学生使用这种方法连续两天多写两篇关于同一患者的报告;总的来说,每个学生提交了四份报告。采用SPSS统计软件描述性统计和配对t检验对112份报告进行分析。结果:配对t检验结果显示,前测和后测的文献质量均数差异有统计学意义(P < 0.001)。此外,在报告结构和内容方面,前测和后测的文献质量平均得分也有显著差异(P < 0.001)。结论:采用穿孔系统可提高护理文献的质量。因此,它可以成为当前叙事或传统方法的合适替代方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Problem, Intervention, Evaluation (PIE) training on the Quality of Nursing Documentation Among Students of Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Background: Documentation of nursing care is one of the most important professional responsibilities of nurses and one of the major components of medical care and patient record documentation. Objectives: The present study was performed to determine the effect of problem, intervention, evaluation (PIE) training on the quality of nursing students’ documentation. Methods: In this semi-experimental single-group study with a pretest-posttest design, a total of 28 nursing students were selected by simple random sampling. The data collection tools included a demographic questionnaire, PIE documentation form, and documentation quality checklist. First, the students were asked to write two reports using the traditional or narrative method. Then, a training workshop was organized about PIE documentation, and the students were asked to use this method and write two more reports about the same patient on two consecutive days; overall, each student presented four reports. A total of 112 reports were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t test in SPSS. Results: Basedontheresultsof paired t test,therewasasignificantdifferenceinthemeanscoreof documentationqualitybetween the pretest and posttest (P < 0.001). Also, there was a significant difference in the mean score of documentation quality between the pretest and posttest in terms of both report structure and content (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Useof PIEreportingsystemimprovesthequalityof nursingdocumentation. Therefore,itcanbeasuitablealternative for the current narrative or traditional method.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信